search for: earl_chew

Josh, Sure. I can try. Would you give me a more detailed description of the requirement ? What exactly does "general MM:SS handling" mean ? Earl ________________________________ From: Josh Coalson <xflac at yahoo.com> To: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com>; "flac-dev at xiph.org" <flac-dev at xiph.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 8:25:34 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Fix cuesheet.c to allow metaflac_test.sh to run to completion Ah, I don't remember but it might have been a negative test that was supposed to give a...

...sh to run to completion I haven't checked git yet but I hope this patch has not gone in.? I don't like the special case that this is creating. It would be better to allow MM:SS everywhere but I consider that low priority. >________________________________ > From: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> >To: "flac-dev at xiph.org" <flac-dev at xiph.org> >Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 8:27 PM >Subject: [flac-dev] Fix cuesheet.c to allow metaflac_test.sh to run to completion > > >When reading the INDEX from the cue sheet, the format MM:SS:FF for...

Copy additional filter values from Foobar2000 as found in <http://code.google.com/p/sirens2/source/browse/trunk/libwavpack-4.32.psp/wvgain.c?r=32> to allow metaflac to perform gain analysis on high sample rate audio. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20120107/018c821b/attachment-0001.htm

Erik, I'll resync and have another look. Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 10:30:21 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Fix cuesheet.c to allow metaflac_test.sh to run to completion Earl Chew wrote: > When reading the INDEX from the cue sheet, the format MM:SS:FF format > is disallowed if the sample frequency is not a mu...

...ness.sci script, combined with more modelling of filter operation in scilab. Such a test would verify that the performance of the replay gain analyser is actually correct. There is only one test to verify handling of harmonics of the filter table sampling frequencies. Signed-off-by: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> --- ?test/test_metaflac.sh |?? 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ?1 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/test_metaflac.sh b/test/test_metaflac.sh index 19f5a00..5b82f11 100755 --- a/test/test_metaflac.sh +++ b/test/test_metaflac.sh @...

When reading the INDEX from the cue sheet, the format MM:SS:FF format is disallowed if the sample frequency is not a multiple of 75 because the index would only be approximate. However, 00:00:00 is _exact_ because it denotes the start of the track, so allow it as a special case. This allows metaflac_test.sh to pass. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...rom src/utils/loudness/loudness.sci. See: ??????? http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2012-February/003220.html Because these filter coefficients can be generated from a known source, they are preferred to the FooBar2000 coefficients whose provenance is unknown. Signed-off-by: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20120222/d4169191/attachment-0001.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Support-56kHz-to-19.2...

Erik, I suspect /bin/sh being dash is what is causing the problem. I will rework the syntax. Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 10:59:50 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain Earl Chew wrote: > I'm using bash. Thats what I'm using. > Before I alter the syntax, what shell are you using ? Bash version 4.2. However, /bin/sh...

...#1 ?? type: 3 (SEEKTABLE) ?? is last: false -? length: 18 -? seek points: 1 -??? point 0: sample_number=0 +? length: 0 +? seek points: 0 ?METADATA block #2 ?? type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT) ?? is last: false Do you have any more insight ? Earl ________________________________ From: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> To: "flac-dev at xiph.org" <flac-dev at xiph.org> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2012 8:50:17 AM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Fix cuesheet.c to allow metaflac_test.sh to run to completion Erik, I'll resync and have another look. Earl ___________________________...

Ah, I don't remember but it might have been a negative test that was supposed to give an error when used with the wrong sample rate. Anyway, could you do another patch that updates to general MM:SS handling? >________________________________ > From: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> >To: Josh Coalson <xflac at yahoo.com>; "flac-dev at xiph.org" <flac-dev at xiph.org> >Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 3:12 PM >Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Fix cuesheet.c to allow metaflac_test.sh to run to completion > > >Josh, > > >I...

Erik, I'm using bash.? Before I alter the syntax, what shell are you using ? Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 3:16:11 AM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain Earl Chew wrote: > There is only one test to verify handling of harmonics of the filter table > sampling frequencies. Earl, I've had a couple of attempts t...

Earl Chew wrote: > That being said, I think my patch leaves us better off than before ! I agree. We will add it as it is and then tweak futher as needed. Earl, would you be able to update your patch so that it applies against the current git master? Cheers, Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/

...or near unexpected token `then' ? ? ./test_metaflac.sh: line 450: `? then' Do both /bin/bash and /bin/dash give exactly the same error message ? Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 3:16:11 AM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain Earl Chew wrote: > There is only one test to verify handling of harmonics of the filter table > sampling frequencies. Earl, I've had a couple of attempts t...

...the problem in a *tar.gz or *zip file, and send it to me directly ? I am using: dash.i686??????????? 0.5.5.1-3.fc12 bash.i686??????????? 4.0.33-1.fc12 Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 12:43:11 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain Earl Chew wrote: > Erik > > > ? ? Testing FLAC file with unknown metadata... OK > ? ? ./test_metaflac.sh: line 450: syntax error near unexpected tok...

Earl Chew wrote: > I'm a little reluctant to introduce another compiled program when there are > so many other options that will work well enough out of the box. > > Here are two ideas: > > 1. Use bc(1) to compute the raw samples > 2. Use perl(1) to compute the raw samples > > To generate raw unsigned samples using bc(1) for example: > > samplerate = 1000;

...approach ?? It means that the wav files need to be checked into the repository. (There are already some small image files in the repository as a precedent.) Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 12:51:22 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Regain play analysis patches Earl Chew wrote: > That being said, I think my patch leaves us better off than before ! I agree. We will add it as it is and then tweak futher as needed. Earl, would you be ab...

...??????? } ??????????????????? while (bx--) { ??????????????????????????? printf("%c", byte[bx]); ??????????????????? } ??????????? } ??? }'? /dev/null ----- Original Message ----- From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 3:30:00 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Regain play analysis patches Earl Chew wrote: > I'm a little reluctant to introduce another compiled program when there are > so many other options that will work well enough out of the box. > > H...

I haven't checked git yet but I hope this patch has not gone in.? I don't like the special case that this is creating. It would be better to allow MM:SS everywhere but I consider that low priority. >________________________________ > From: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> >To: "flac-dev at xiph.org" <flac-dev at xiph.org> >Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 8:27 PM >Subject: [flac-dev] Fix cuesheet.c to allow metaflac_test.sh to run to completion > > >When reading the INDEX from the cue sheet, the format MM:SS:FF for...

Earl Chew wrote: > One per filter table entry. That's 12 files right now. Thats probably a bit much. > The files could be generated on the fly, but that would either require > another program or script (eg Perl), Anything but Perl. I can write Perl but I can't read it :-). > or a dependence on an external toolkit such as sox. I'd be ok with requiring sox to run the

Hi all, In the last couple of months, there have been two proposed patches for the regain play analysis code. The first by Nathan Rennie-Waldock: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2011-December/003070.html simply adds some more higher sample rates. The second by Earl Chew: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2012-January/003067.html is more comprehensive. Neither of the