search for: donkeys

Hi all, As an experiment I'm trying to log into a samba server (3.3.2) from GDM. Both systems are running Ubuntu 9.04 and LDAP is not involved. But it's not working. The test user credentials are donkey/donkey . On the client: # net rpc join -S 192.168.0.1 -U root Enter root's password: Joined domain LAB-SAMBA. # wbinfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls succeeded #

I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this. I'm using a Linux box in my house as a NAS, so that I can make backups, move large files, etc. The problem is that, whenever I try to move/copy a file larger than 100MB or so off of the linux machine to my Windows machine, I get "Specified network name is no longer available" on the Windows machine and the transfer aborts.

Hi I have outgoing speed 128kbit and 5 users. So I want to cat outgoing traffic to 50kbit per user. The best Idea is make HTB queue 10kbit ceil 50kbit but one user (the Donkey one :) ) who using P2P take all the outgoing band. When I make HTB is trafic was very low Donkey doesn''t get any data or take only a little, outgoing traffic was about 1-2K, but In HTB trafic I have full outgoing

Mark Lehrer <mark@knm.org> writes: > What icecast version are you using? There was a bug prior to 1.3.11 > that caused this exact symptom. I am using 1.3.12+patch at the moment. That patch I have on it was the one I submitted earlier which fixes the problem with the wrong arguments passed to snprintf in the avl code. That shouldn't affect sound. I'm fairly certain it's a

Hi everybody! I''m very happy with shorewall, seems to safe my computer well, a little bit to well. But i''m sure it''s a mistake of mine: I can''t get edonkey working! They say that edonkey needs the following ports enabled: 4665 udp in / out 3665,4665,7665,8665 udp out 4661,4662,4666 tcp in thats what i wrote in the rules file: ACCEPT fw net

Andreas, A few thoughts regarding your system 1) If it's a home system and you're specifically concerned about mitigating CVE 2017-7494, (a) verify that your share isn't mounted 'noexec' - if it's mounted this way then you're safe (b) if not (a), then add the [global] parameter "nt pipe support = no". This will break functionality that relies on support for

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:30:47AM -0400, Gene Cumm wrote: > 0) In case someone else has insight or searches later, I'd like to have > this on list. Some clients may work better with reply all. If you're not > on the list yet, I believe the posts by unsubscribed addresses are > moderated. Indeed, unsubscribed E-mail address wait for human approval before they go to all of

i am using ipp2p module (v 0.6) from http://rnvs.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/ipp2p/index_en.html I have tried it on kazaa and e-donkey connections. Unfortunately, I am interesting in limiting kazaa traffic, which this modules seems not to work right with it. (Kazza traffic is not identified most of the cases....). Has anyone tried this kazza bandwidth control???

Hello, Short question: * Node A is connected ("ConnectTo-Statement") to nodes B1, B2. * Tinc is operated in routed mode. * B1 and B2 are serving same subnets (Subnet=172.27.0.0/16, Subnet=fdd3:5d16:b5dd:3::0/64). How will tinc route packages to 172.27.0.0/16 and fdd3:5d16:b5dd:3::0/64 sent from A? * Will load balancing between B1 and B2 take place? * Is the decision stable - eg. is

This is not directly a Rails question but you lot seem the best to ask... I have a strong feeling we will be developing future apps in Rails (Ruby fans are slowly starting to outnumber cynics in my office) so I want a web server plan that will be appropriate for that. We have just bought two new web servers I want to turn into a load-balanced, redundant pair. As well as any Rails

Call update_domain_wallclock_time on hvm_latch_shinfo_size even if the bitness of the guest has already been set, this fixes the problem with the wallclock not being set for PVHVM guests on resume from migration. Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> Cc: George Dunlap

Hey, I have been progressively learning more and more rails each day (from both a current project, reading the agile book, and this list). Does anybody think it would be beneficial to have kind of like a rails "Best Practices" page that lists some of the better ways of handling certain functions of rails (that are common in most apps) that are both more elegant, and efficient. For

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20041028/dbf887a9/attachment.pl -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: random1.txt Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20041028/dbf887a9/random1.txt

On 06/10/2013 01:41 PM, pr.G wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:29:32AM +0400, свящ. Георгий Гольцов wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:07:08AM +0800, Gao feng wrote: >>> On 06/09/2013 08:14 PM, pr.G wrote: >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> Is it possible to start container via libvirt_lxc without mounting /sys >>>> inside container?

Fellow Railers, Is there anything, anywhere, that I can read that discusses overall RoR app design? I have the Agile RoR book, which is great for learning the details of RoR, but unfortunately doesn''t cover the overall issue of creating a large, complex RoR app. My staff and I are still in the process of getting up to speed on Ruby and RoR, but we also need to begin thinking about

Hola and thanks for any help in advance I installed mandrake 9 a few days ago and wanted to set up some additional rules to shorewall, bu i failed :) What i want to do is basicly route any incomming udp and tcp packets on port 4665 to a workstation behind the router. router with mandrake 9, eth0 (192.168.0.1) internal net, eth1(10.0.0.0) connected to dsl modem and gets a dynamic ip

Hi Stephan, Thanks for reporting. Now we know it doesn't work on IE 5.5/Windows (but it works on IE5.2 on MAC). You had nice idea to store the file on the icecast2 root. Unfortunately, I already tried it few days ago and it didn't work either... Cheers, MAX -----Original Message----- From: owner-icecast@xiph.org [mailto:owner-icecast@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Neufeind Sent:

Hi All, I am looking at ZFS and I get that they call it RAIDZ which is similar to RAID 5, but what about RAID 10? Isn''t a RAID 10 setup better for data protection? So if I have 8 x 1.5tb drives, wouldn''t I: - mirror drive 1 and 5 - mirror drive 2 and 6 - mirror drive 3 and 7 - mirror drive 4 and 8 Then stripe 1,2,3,4 Then stripe 5,6,7,8 How does one do this with ZFS?

Hello again, Jeremy and other Samba experts, I'm sorry to be such a pain in your neck(s), but I still need your help in looking for help trying to find out why SMB2/3.1.1 in Samba 4.6.5 performs so much worse than SMB/1.5 in Samba 3.6.15 in scenarios with a huge number of small files. As requested by Jeremy, I have done wireshark "pcapng" captures of the four scenarios as

Good Afternoon All, I''m just pondering - I think that my expectations of the forge are not 100% aligned, or I''m still rubbish with puppet! I imagine the forge to be used in the following scenario/way I''m in a situation where I need to provision package X in a particular way. I fire up my terminal: $ puppet module search packageX Searching https://forge.puppetlabs.com