search for: dlj

David Jones <dlj at google.com> writes: > >> * Provide C symbols as specified by the standards, but take advantage > >> and use C++ language facilities for the core implementation. > > Does this mean C programs would require a C++ runtime? If not, how will > the project ensure th...

Hi. I googled for this thoroughly but couldn''t find any module that actually worked. Is there any good puppet module or manifest for installing Sun JDK? Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

...39;t reflect changes made in zaptel and zapata.conf entries. Any other config files that it doesn't reload? >From: "Asterisk@Home" <asteriskathome@yahoo.com> > >Did you go into AMP and configure some place for >incomming calls to go? > >--- David Josephson <dlj@altaphon.com> wrote: > > > >>Is there a configuration difference for clone X100P >>cards versus >>"compatible"? I have a similar problem to what David >>Shaw posted earlier >> >> > >

...ings to be aware of. The folks at jpackage.org are pretty much all over this development but it's not the bright shiny news everyone has made it out to be. Sun did a very good thing by moving java under the GPL, and they should be commended for FINALLY seeing the light after the failure of the DLJ license BUT: 1. Sun did not open all of java under the GPL. There are still several chunks of java which remain license encumbered and will require community workarounds or further moves by Sun to open code. Currently these include the color management code, font rasteriser code, graphics rasteris...

...x right away. I have uploaded a diff to Phabricator, however I ask to please keep high-level comments on this thread: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18382 This build would be owned and monitored by Google. If there are no strong objections in the next few days, I will go ahead with this plan. Thanks, dlj -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160322/1f22e828/attachment.html>

...> high-level comments on this thread: >> http://reviews.llvm.org/D18382 >> >> This build would be owned and monitored by Google. >> >> If there are no strong objections in the next few days, I will go ahead >> with this plan. >> >> Thanks, >> dlj >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-dev mailing list >> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed....

Someone on the opennms mail list just mentioned that RHEL up2date now provides sun java. Is that a possibility for the Centos repositories? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

...I think having -Werror bots is a good idea, at least when self hosting. Non-self-hosting -Werror (i.e. with older versions of Clang, or with GCC, etc.) might also be useful, but I'm less sure (since we can't fix those warnings if the warning is the problem). -Hal > > Thanks, > dlj > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-dev mailing list > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev > -- Hal Finkel Assistant Computational Scientist Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory

...cator, however I ask to please keep > high-level comments on this thread: > http://reviews.llvm.org/D18382 > > This build would be owned and monitored by Google. > > If there are no strong objections in the next few days, I will go ahead > with this plan. > > Thanks, > dlj > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-dev mailing list > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pip...

PaulR (sorry again if this is known knowledge) > There's no reason for Herald to be adding project LLVM/subscriber llvm-commits at the last second here. Its possible the rL (LLVM) had be added as the repository in the review on creation rather than rCFE, if thats the case then the herald rule "H270" is going to fire because it see the repository in the review, so add LLVM

Is there a configuration difference for clone X100P cards versus "compatible"? I have a similar problem to what David Shaw posted earlier today. 0.5 installed OK, but mine just with one X100P clone. Default config files, edited zapata.conf per the FAQs so it includes the line channel => 1 without the semicolon. Any outgoing call attempt returns "all circuits are busy"

hi, je me pr?sente ou plutot ma distrib ^^ : I introduce myself or rather my distribution > # These settings were set by the catalyst build script that automatically > # built this stage. > # Please consult /etc/make.conf.example for a more detailed example. > CFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -mtune=athlon64 -Wno-error -O2 -pipe" > CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" > # WARNING:

Aaron Ballman via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >> * Ability to layer this libc over the system libc. Echoing others, this seems dubious to me. Why not build up small pieces at a time and write tests for them? This library doesn't need to support all existing programs out of the gate. I dont't think libc++ layered on top of existing standard C++ libraries,

...a, at least when self hosting. > Non-self-hosting -Werror (i.e. with older versions of Clang, or with GCC, > etc.) might also be useful, but I'm less sure (since we can't fix those > warnings if the warning is the problem). > > -Hal > > > > > Thanks, > > dlj > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cfe-dev mailing list > > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org > > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev > > > > -- > Hal Finkel > Assistant Computational Scientist > Leader...

Hi James, I've started working with the prototype layout in context of Google's internal infrastructure. With deep apologies, I have a (very late, I know) pair of requests that have only recently solidified for me. 1. Could you add annotated tags after the cut point of each release? (I think this would probably be easy.) 2. Could you mark branch/tag operations somehow other than a

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:18 AM Alex Bradbury via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 15:07, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 3:34 PM James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> > wrote: > > > > We don't *need* it, no. But it might be useful. >

James Y Knight via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 5:46 PM David Jones <dlj at google.com> wrote: >> $ git tag -m 'Begin development of 8.0.0.' '8.0.0svn' 63297479398 >> >> Then, `git describe` can give a useful result that would be stable(-ish >> [*]): >> >> $ git describe --match=\*svn >> 8.0.0svn-7878-gfdb0803...

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018, 13:21 David Greene via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org wrote: > [ Consider all of this to be preferences, not anything close to an > objection. ] > > Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > > There haven't been many more responses in the last few days, so can we > > try to come to some kind of

On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 5:29 AM <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > One particular change: I've disabled notifications for the duplicate > Subversion meta-repos... so, for example, a commit to Clang will still get > 2 notifications (rL and rG). Before yesterday, this should have sent 3: one > each for rL, rG, and rC. Projects not in the monorepo will get > notifications

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:04 PM NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, David. > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 7:46 AM David Jones via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi James, >> >> I've started working with the prototype layout in context of Google's >> internal infrastructure. With deep apologies, I