search for: disgustingly

On 12/24/18 7:21 AM, vsnsdualce at memeware.net wrote: > Debian is not ruled by the men who actually write the software, but > instead women. *snip* Can we please ban the person who sent that disgusting rant to the list?

Dear all, my R files (and the .csv files as well) are saved somewhere pretty deep down my hard disk. i have to chage to working directory therefore everytime i run R (i run it on powerPC mac), which is disgusting. using the setwd command at the beginning of an R script doesnt really help because i have to find this file first by hand. I am looking for possibility to run setwd during the

On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 01:26:15PM -0500, rj coleman wrote: > > > > On Dec 24, 2018, at 10:42 AM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: > > > >> On 12/24/18 7:21 AM, vsnsdualce at memeware.net wrote: > >> Debian is not ruled by the men who actually write the software, but instead women. > > > > *snip* > > > > Can we

Hi, could anyone give recommendations (or share experience) regarding using ZFS: - FreeBSD 7-Stable (amd64 with 8GB RAM) + special tuning necessary (apart from increasing kernel memory to 1 or more GB for ZFS) - Samba 3.2 + ACLs possible directly under ZFS? + recommended compile options? - NFS - email (imap) - jails (I have seen some problems exist with using snaphots within

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:22:33AM -0800, Shuxin Yang wrote: > I do some google, I cannot find the answer... > I check C std, I cannot find answer either. > > Delete infinite empty loop is boring, but if C/C++ lawyers could tell it > is safe to to so, > it would obviate the need to prove a non-countable loop infinite or not > before > DCE can delete it. > > That

I do some google, I cannot find the answer... I check C std, I cannot find answer either. Delete infinite empty loop is boring, but if C/C++ lawyers could tell it is safe to to so, it would obviate the need to prove a non-countable loop infinite or not before DCE can delete it. That is the answer I'm waiting for to delete a disgusting dead non-countable loop in my way. On 11/14/2012

Thomas, You should post this hear, as it's just as relevant ;) Hey guys, how do you feel now that you all owe Thompson $2k per year? Vorbis look more interesting now :) It's really disgusting how the technology is now worth more than the music. jack. ----- Forwarded message from Thomas Kirk <thomas@arkena.com> ----- Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 11:58:23 +0200 From: Thomas Kirk

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:00:25PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > As the vcpu_is_preempted() call is pretty costly compared with other > checks within mutex_spin_on_owner() and rwsem_spin_on_owner(), they > are done at a reduce frequency of once every 256 iterations. That's just disgusting.

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:00:25PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > As the vcpu_is_preempted() call is pretty costly compared with other > checks within mutex_spin_on_owner() and rwsem_spin_on_owner(), they > are done at a reduce frequency of once every 256 iterations. That's just disgusting.

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > will surgent wrote: > > > Hello, I was trying to compile Flac on MinGW/Msys but got an error stating > > SIZE_T_MAX is undefined. > > To fix this error I edited the file "flac-1.2.1/include/share/alloc.h" and > > made the following change: Would it be possible to get this patch applied? I still hit this every time I try to

It does look like Gentleman and Ihaka not only lied to the New York Times, but also to the New Zealand Herald and who knows who else. This is disgusting. The R programming language is the S programming language, and Gentleman and Ihaka are not the ones who designed it. http://thenewyorktimesissloppy.blogspot.com/

I have four large two-dimensional matrices of which I want to create contour plots. Something like filled.contour(<matrix>) contourplot(<matrix>) works but only gives me one plot at a time. If I combine the four matrices into one three-dimensional matrix, which I'll name "seven", there should be a way of doing something like this contourplot(seven[,,k] for k in 1 to 4)

Is it possible to have sshd print out /etc/issue before users attempt to log in? We are required to print some sort of disclaimer, and the only way I have found to do this so far is some disgusting hack involving debug statements. Chris

Jeff Van Dyke's "Public Key Assistant subsystem" was previously discussed here: (end of a short thread) http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=103436908422003&w=2 I do see a few comments that seem to point out his arrogance and some disgust about OpenBSD's RCSID, but has anybody found it to be unsecure or if it was bug ridden. The subject sorta dies right

Hi, I just tried to register for the wine forum, and noticed several really annoying things about the process: 1. The "Register" link is kind of hard to find. Normally it is just next to the "Forgot password" link. 2. No SSL. 3. You emailed me my password! Argh! This is a terrible idea for obvious reasons, and also implies: 4. Passwords aren't stored hashed. Seriously.

Unbelievable! These guys get more and more disgusting each day. But now I have a proof that Linux and all its free software community (samba included) are indeed growing and are indeed consideder a threat by M$. Expect more and dirtier moves. Can you guys point me to more material on the subject? []'s, Juan > From: "Le Quellec, Francis" <FLeQuell@Teknor.com> > >

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > I thought hard about this, I think we are better off waiting till the > next release: there's a chance QEMU will have IOMMU support for KVM x86 > then, and this will make it easier to judge which way does the wind > blow. > > It seems that we lose nothing substantial keeping the status quo

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > I thought hard about this, I think we are better off waiting till the > next release: there's a chance QEMU will have IOMMU support for KVM x86 > then, and this will make it easier to judge which way does the wind > blow. > > It seems that we lose nothing substantial keeping the status quo

-----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com on behalf of Steve Edwards Sent: Fri 7/9/2010 5:32 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] False answer() being sent by cellphone providers On Fri, 9 Jul 2010, Mike Ely wrote: > (off list) Continuing to veer off-topic... > Yes indeed we do. The telcos

As seen on the wx-dev mailing list yesterday: http://lists.wxwindows.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?5:mss:42943:200402:ennjfiogkccphebpmcfc