search for: digests

[cc:ing to the maintainer of digest] FYI, package 'digest' (v0.2.1 2005/11/04 04:45:53) generates the same output regardless of input with R v2.4.0 devel (2006-07-25 r38698). Starting a vanilla R session you get: > library(digest) > digest(1) [1] "3416a75f4cea9109507cacd8e2f2aefc" > digest(2) [1] "3416a75f4cea9109507cacd8e2f2aefc" > digest(rnorm(10)) [1]

...key object - no need to specify paths or filenames. You can specify > paths etc if you want to, but by default it is just transparent. The problem is I need to refer to the image from the documentation, so I do need to know it's path. I also want to be able to look at the image, so if the digests are different I can see what the difference is (I'm planning to automate this with the imagemagick compare command line tool). > However, I think Hadley is referring to a different problem. > Basically, he got an object containing a lot of fields, but for his > purposes it is only a s...

Hello dovecot community, I've setup dovecot and need a bit help in understanding the auth mechanism digest-md5 and realm in 10-auth.conf I got auth_mechanisms = plain login digest-md5 cram-md5 apop #auth_realms = #auth_default_realm = So i got empty realms. Auth normally works fine and clients can auth with mechanism digest-md5 and I see the following log entries: dovecot: auth: Debug:

I've googled and I believe that SASL method DIGEST-MD5 is supported and I see it in the samba startup, but it doesn't work. ldapsearch -Y DIGEST-MD5 -h dc03.mediture.dom SASL/DIGEST-MD5 authentication started ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Operations error (1) additional info: SASL:[DIGEST-MD5]: Failed to start authentication backend: NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER [root at dc03 ~]# samba

I always get the messages of this list in a digest format. This is bad to handle, esp. if you want to answer a question found in the digest. Does everyone else also get the list as a digest? Is there a way to switch to single messages? If not how do I easily answer messages which the subject correctly set? Or how do I automatically split the digest into the separate messages? For your

I'm receiving the centos-request in digest mode. Using Fedora 10 and Evolution. When I tried to reply to a centos-request message inside the digest, the result doesn't seem to look right. I cut/paste the proper subject line (replacing the CentOS Digest, Vol NN, Issue nn text), but some have complained that this approach doesn't allow the original question and replies to be threaded.

Hello, I am passive reader of both R-devel and R-help mailing lists. I am sending the following comments to r-devel as it seemed more suitable. I am aware that this list uses GNU mailman for the list management. I have my options set that it sends a email digest. One thing I find is that the digest consists of emails that ordered temporarlly. For eg lets say there are two threads t1 and t2

...p-digest is the same as mail to R-help (such that replying to R-help-digest will reply to where appropriate). I am proposing (and have currently activated) to have digestifications 3 times a week, on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday (at MET 04 = UTC 04+{1|2}). Another possibility would be daily digests. I think we should keep it as it is now for a while and have the digest subscribers send me mail (not to the list which is identical to R-help) if a different schedule is desired [e.g. S-news-digest is daily]. Finally, how do you change your subscription from R-help to R-help-digest? On Unix {with...

Colleagues, Today's digest (Volume 94, Issue 12) contained an entire copy of Digest, Vol 94, Issue 11. It appears that an inconsiderate poster (Message 39 in Issue 12) received the digest and clicked reply, thereby including the entire digest in his/her submission (> 6000 additional lines of text). This made it difficult to scroll through the digest efficiently. At minimum, posters

Hello all, It was brought to my attention that : Something is not right about the digesting system for nut-upsuser. For example, I received 9 digests dated 15 May 2025. The first of these had 3 messages and all the others only one each. I would like to get one digest per day with all of the messages for that day. Maybe the threshold for sending out the digest because it is "too long" has been set to some tiny value. Upon some revi...

Hello all, It was brought to my attention that : Something is not right about the digesting system for nut-upsuser. For example, I received 9 digests dated 15 May 2025. The first of these had 3 messages and all the others only one each. I would like to get one digest per day with all of the messages for that day. Maybe the threshold for sending out the digest because it is "too long" has been set to some tiny value. Upon some revi...

...6.7p1, OpenSSL 1.0.1h-fips 5 Jun 2014 debug1: Reading configuration data ssh.config main: mux digest failed The problem was that ssh_digest_by_alg() couldn't verify alg with an index bigger than 1 since the line with SSH_DIGEST_RIPEMD160 wasn't compiled in and all indexes in the ssh_digest digests array was lowered by one. /* NB. Indexed directly by algorithm number */ const struct ssh_digest digests[] = { { SSH_DIGEST_MD5, "MD5", 16, EVP_md5 }, #ifdef HAVE_EVP_RIPEMD160 /* XXX replace with local if missing */ { SSH_DIGEST_RIPEMD160, "RIPEMD160", 20, EVP_ripemd160 },...

i cant make sense in my own mind what is happening, so if someone can explain, it would be appreciated. I did the following on the command line.. >require ''md5'' =>true >t = MD5 =>Digest::MD5 >t.md5(''confused'') =>1a7f2a5ad77128b2f81feddac78df213 # so far so good, now start new command line # or unload module >require

...cantly (500K? more?) or abolishing it and just going > for one digest per day? > > I guess the setting is there to make heated discussions (much traffic) > visible faster. I suppose it does not impact people receiving every message > independently. Either that or avoiding really big digests. I say set the size threshold to 5 MB and that makes it one digest per day. I also say, not that you asks, that digests are problematic, because people reply and quote the entire digest. Really you need an MUA that splits them, and then if you have filtering into folders that's just extra w...

...cantly (500K? more?) or abolishing it and just going > for one digest per day? > > I guess the setting is there to make heated discussions (much traffic) > visible faster. I suppose it does not impact people receiving every message > independently. Either that or avoiding really big digests. I say set the size threshold to 5 MB and that makes it one digest per day. I also say, not that you asks, that digests are problematic, because people reply and quote the entire digest. Really you need an MUA that splits them, and then if you have filtering into folders that's just extra w...

I enabled rpmforge on a fresh install as per the centos wiki with priorities and attempted to execute 'yum install perl-Digest-Perl-MD5' and received the following: [root at test ~]# yum install perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 Loading "installonlyn" plugin Loading "priorities" plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local

Hi I get this mailing-list as a digest (as everyone does, i guess). This is quite inconvinient for answering single questions.. I every digest there is a message with Subject: Re: Samba dingest <NR>... This makes it hard to keep track about whath message the replay is ment for. Another problem is, that mime-attachments don?t seem to work. This is especially bad, because some Microsoft

AFAIK there is no hashing utility in base R which can create hash digests of arbitrary R objects. However, as also described by Henrik Bengtsson in [1], we have tools::md5sum() which calculates MD5 hashes of files. Calculating hashes of in-memory objects is a very common task in several areas, as demonstrated by the popularity of the 'digest' package (~850.00...

That's too bad, I was trying to get the Vasco Identikey server working with samba4 as a backend for FIPS 140-2 compliant OTP, which will only bind with DIGEST-MD5. I guess I will have to join a Windows 2008 R2 to the domain as a domain controller. Thanks for clarifying, Arthur On 07/10/2015 04:38 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 15:10 -0500, Arthur Ramsey wrote:

Hi I'm sorry. I mailed the same question again. because, it cannot be yet solved. any ideas with asterisk? [Aug 20 14:40:12] WARNING[29315]: chan_sip.c:11806 check_auth: username mismatch, have <aaaa>, digest has aaaa at 192.168.0.1[Aug 20 14:40:12] NOTICE[29315]: chan_sip.c:20479 handle_request_register: Registration from 'aaaa <sip:aaaa at 192.168.0.1>' failed for