search for: detested

I came across this in connection with an unrelated issue > beta[2] Error in beta[2] : object is not subsettable > beta[2] <- 5 Error in "[<-"(`*tmp*`, 2, value = 5) : object is not subsetable One of the messages must be wrong, but I need a native English speaker to tell me which one. -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of

I have IMAP voicemail working with Exchange 2003 using a single username and password for multiple mailboxes. Right now, I am setting up asterisk to use voicemail with my Cisco Call Manager (Which I detest BTW...) and I have everything working, EXCEPT: I cannot get my externnotify script to run when any changes have been made to the VoiceMail... Scenario: Bob gets a call -> Bob

Sorry about that I typed and sent a full message, but it looks like the entire body got swallowed up in transit. Here is the full text again. Let's hope this one works. I have a server running CentOS 7.9 with the system provided Samba packages (4.10.16-24.el7_9). It is joined to an Active Directory domain and acting as a member server. The active Directory domain has a user object with among

On 6/3/2011 3:19 PM, Samuel Crow wrote: > Why not runtime checks? The constant folding and dead-code elimination passes would get rid of any redundant code in a later stage of compilation anyway. The important part, as I see it, is that LLVM already does constant folding and dead-code elimination. Meta-data might require more effort in the long run. > > --snip-- Less flexible for the

On Thu 03-08-17 18:42:15, Wei Wang wrote: > On 08/03/2017 05:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >On Thu 03-08-17 14:38:18, Wei Wang wrote: [...] > >>+static int report_free_page_block(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, > >>+ unsigned int migratetype, struct page **page) > >This is just too ugly and wrong actually. Never provide struct page > >pointers

On Thu 03-08-17 18:42:15, Wei Wang wrote: > On 08/03/2017 05:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >On Thu 03-08-17 14:38:18, Wei Wang wrote: [...] > >>+static int report_free_page_block(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, > >>+ unsigned int migratetype, struct page **page) > >This is just too ugly and wrong actually. Never provide struct page > >pointers

Hi, Does anyone know a way to override .blank? method that rails provides. I want to add additional custom checks (specific to my application) to this method. Thanks, Pratik

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 08:49:21AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Fred Smith > <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: > > I'm trying to figure out if the stock kernels for Centos-6 and/or Centos-7 > > have ExecShield compiled in, and if so, if it is turned on by default. > > According to what I've read, Exec Shield is enabled

Straying OT ... > > On Tue, September 19, 2017 1:42 pm, Nux! wrote: > > > Unfortunately the same can be said about Ruby, RoR, Python etc etc etc. > > > > It is not as much true about languages themselves (though it is true, and > > I for one call python "sneaky snake" just because of that ;-), as about > > <snip> > Yeah, in addition to

I know I'm slightly OT here, asking about RHEL, but since Centos is now a part of RH, I'm hoping I won't be summarily ejected. I've seen several articles that listed Centos 6.x as vulnerable, but DID NOT LIST RHEL 6. I'd think that if Centos 6.x is vulnerable, then so would RHEL 6.x, since Centos is made from RHEL sources. Does anyone know for sure either way? thanks! --

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 08:08:08PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > Gang: > > I'm puzzled... > > I rebooted a while ago (and in between the down and up, I installed Fedora > 20 Beta on a USB hard drive, making sure it wouldn't mess with my Centos > system). The install went fine, but afterwards, when I reboot Centos, it > comes up with a black screen and a clock as the

----- Original Message ----- > From: Nate Fries <nfries88 at yahoo.com> > To: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com>; LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Cc: > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2011 6:52 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends > > Most JVMs perform terribly. Even Sun's has had notable performance

On Thu 03-08-17 19:27:19, Wei Wang wrote: > On 08/03/2017 06:44 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >On Thu 03-08-17 18:42:15, Wei Wang wrote: > >>On 08/03/2017 05:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >>>On Thu 03-08-17 14:38:18, Wei Wang wrote: > >[...] > >>>>+static int report_free_page_block(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, > >>>>+

On Thu 03-08-17 19:27:19, Wei Wang wrote: > On 08/03/2017 06:44 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >On Thu 03-08-17 18:42:15, Wei Wang wrote: > >>On 08/03/2017 05:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >>>On Thu 03-08-17 14:38:18, Wei Wang wrote: > >[...] > >>>>+static int report_free_page_block(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, > >>>>+

Hi! Just did a TEST install of centos5 on an old PIII box. one of the things I wanted to see was the fancy desktop eye-candy of compiz and/or beryl. This box has a nvidia 6600 series card, and I've isntalled the Nvidia drivers (download from nvidia and run their installer). I used the software updater to install compiz (didn't show up on original install, perhaps I didn't hold my

On Thu 03-08-17 20:11:58, Wei Wang wrote: > On 08/03/2017 07:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >On Thu 03-08-17 19:27:19, Wei Wang wrote: > >>On 08/03/2017 06:44 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >>>On Thu 03-08-17 18:42:15, Wei Wang wrote: > >>>>On 08/03/2017 05:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >>>>>On Thu 03-08-17 14:38:18, Wei Wang wrote: >

On Thu 03-08-17 20:11:58, Wei Wang wrote: > On 08/03/2017 07:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >On Thu 03-08-17 19:27:19, Wei Wang wrote: > >>On 08/03/2017 06:44 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >>>On Thu 03-08-17 18:42:15, Wei Wang wrote: > >>>>On 08/03/2017 05:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >>>>>On Thu 03-08-17 14:38:18, Wei Wang wrote: >

Just found out [R 0.63, standard -v -n] : > rm(list=ls()) > gc() free total Ncells 96538 200000 Vcells 214008 250000 > hist(runif(50000)) Error: heap memory (1953 Kb) exhausted [needed 390 Kb more] which is a bit astonishing given that I still have room for 214000 double's > u1 <- runif(50000) > u2 <- runif(50000) > gc()

I'm considering upgrading, and am trying to choose a modern motherboard that nevertheless fully works with Centos5/RHEL5. Though I'm partial to AMD processors, and would like to use one in my new configuration, that's not a requirement, if the most appropriate board happens to be intel-compatible. However, given the way ASUS is dumping LInux and crawling more firmly into bed with

Hi all, Lustre 1.8.3 is available on the Sun Download Center Site. http://www.sun.com/software/products/lustre/get.jsp Our forwarding link has not yet been updated but should be shortly, so you can either find your way in through: http://www.sun.com/downloads/index.jsp?tab=2#L and look for Lustre 1.8.3 near the bottom of the "L" section. or