search for: deliverd

...t fn INTERFACE_VERSION [2011/09/13 10:13:10.627257, 3] winbindd/winbindd_misc.c:352(winbindd_interface_version) [28857]: request interface version [2011/09/13 10:13:10.627282, 10] winbindd/winbindd.c:716(winbind_client_response_written) winbind_client_response_written[28857:INTERFACE_VERSION]: deliverd response to client [2011/09/13 10:13:10.627352, 10] winbindd/winbindd.c:620(process_request) process_request: request fn WINBINDD_PRIV_PIPE_DIR [2011/09/13 10:13:10.627379, 3] winbindd/winbindd_misc.c:385(winbindd_priv_pipe_dir) [28857]: request location of privileged pipe [2011/09/13 10:13:10...

...n+0x30) [0x7f547f6b8b00] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(master_service_run+0x13) [0x7f547f643ac3] -> dovecot/lmtp(main+0x1c9) [0x7f548009f2c9] -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7f547f286b45] -> dovecot/lmtp(+0x53ae) [0x7f548009f3ae] Normal Mails are not deliverd but filterd mails are deliverd. System is Debian 8.6 Dovecot Core is 2%3a2.3.0-alpha0-1-auto+385 AMD64 can anyone help. Sven

...een two point where dovecot tells the client he is here, and sould have nothing directly todo with the notification of new mails arrived. I played with the values around. And the courios is, in thunderbird the folloing. set to 30 seconds. Thunderbird pop up around 25 seconds after the message is deliverd to the inbox. set to 60 seconds. Thunderbird pup up around 50 seconds after the message is deliverd to the inbox. I switch over from archiveopteryx, where no such delay was. Regards, Ingo

...8b00] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(master_service_run+0x13) [0x7f547f643ac3] -> dovecot/lmtp(main+0x1c9) [0x7f548009f2c9] -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7f547f286b45] -> dovecot/lmtp(+0x53ae) [0x7f548009f3ae] > > > > Normal Mails are not deliverd but filterd mails are deliverd. > > System is Debian 8.6 Dovecot Core is 2%3a2.3.0-alpha0-1-auto+385 AMD64 > > Problem is known and fixed. New builds are currently blocked by an > unrelated build failure, which will be resolved soon. Ah, I was wondering about that. I tried rebuildi...

...ault-First-Site-Name' result : NT_STATUS_OK Finished processing child request 63 Writing 3912 bytes to parent dsgetdcname failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED wb_request_done[21194:DSGETDCNAME]: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED winbind_client_response_written[21194:DSGETDCNAME]: deliverd response to client process_request: Handling async request 21194:DSGETDCNAME [21194]: dsgetdcname for DOMAIN.ARRIAD.COM dsgetdcname failed: NT_STATUS_PIPE_BROKEN wb_request_done[21194:DSGETDCNAME]: NT_STATUS_PIPE_BROKEN winbind_client_response_written[21194:DSGETDCNAME]: deliverd response to client...

Hi, we have a strange problem: two of our users informed me, that they aren't able to send word-.doc-files anymore while othe attachements work fine. The e-mail gets deliverd, but the attachement is dropped. This happens using the latest thunderbird 1.5.x and mac os x. The e-mail is also not saved in the send-drawer. If the users send the same e-mail to the same recepient using an other mailclient, there is no problem. Other users (like me) using the same systemsettin...

...INTERFACE_VERSION [2012/10/31 17:43:09.223378, 3] winbindd/winbindd_misc.c:352(winbindd_interface_version) [19232]: request interface version [2012/10/31 17:43:09.223415, 10] winbindd/winbindd.c:716(winbind_client_response_written) winbind_client_response_written[19232:INTERFACE_VERSION]: deliverd response to client [2012/10/31 17:43:09.223477, 10] winbindd/winbindd.c:620(process_request) process_request: request fn WINBINDD_PRIV_PIPE_DIR [2012/10/31 17:43:09.223499, 3] winbindd/winbindd_misc.c:385(winbindd_priv_pipe_dir) [19232]: request location of privileged pipe [2012/10/31 17:4...

...u-13.10. I use dovcot as LDA with a LDAP-passdb and a pam-passdb. The userdb is static. A mail to LDAP-user 'foo' is delivered with the error-message dovecot: lda(foo): Error: User foo doesn't have home dir set, disabling duplicate database A mail to the pam-user 'bar' will deliverd without this error. But both users should work with the static-userdb. Where is my mistake? Greetings Christian dovecot --version 2.1.7 ############################################ my dovecot.conf # 2.1.7: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.11.0-22-generic i686 Ubuntu 13.10 ext4 disable_pla...

...n INTERFACE_VERSION [2011/04/12 17:37:56.047909, 3] winbindd/winbindd_misc.c:352(winbindd_interface_version) [ 5304]: request interface version [2011/04/12 17:37:56.047952, 10] winbindd/winbindd.c:716(winbind_client_response_written) winbind_client_response_written[5304:INTERFACE_VERSION]: deliverd response to client [2011/04/12 17:37:56.048022, 10] winbindd/winbindd.c:620(process_request) process_request: request fn WINBINDD_PRIV_PIPE_DIR [2011/04/12 17:37:56.048045, 3] winbindd/winbindd_misc.c:385(winbindd_priv_pipe_dir) [ 5304]: request location of privileged pipe [2011/04/12 17:3...

...tes. recently, at multiple customer sites it has started just going away. no core file (yes, ulimit is configured), nothing in any of its (several) log files. it's just gone. running it under strace until it dies reveals that every thread has been given a SIGKILL. How does one figure out who deliverd a SIGKILL? For other, non-fatal, signals it is possible to glean the PID of the sending process in a signal handler, but obviously you can't do that for SIGKILL because the app doesn't survive the signal. I'm grasping at straws here, and am open to almost any kind of suggestion that...

...dovecot.org/LDA but changed the auth_socket_path to point into the chroot of postfix. I have attached my dovecot.conf at the end of this email. The mails that are sent to the machine are not delivered at all. In the mail-logfile I can see the following error message for each mail that can't be deliverd: postfix/pipe[21344]: BC254154E5BD: to=<root>, orig_to=<root>, relay=dovecot, delay=0, status=bounced (user unknown) I've already search the net but could not find any clue how to solve this. Can anyone give me a hint what to do? cu Alexander dovecot.conf: ==================...

I'm filtering that is being deliverd to postfix mail server with amavisd-new . I want spam with spam f level 1 - 8 to ad a tag any everything above to be delete is this posebol? If yes how? Met vriendelijk groet, Bas van Dikkenberg GISkit bv BFVD1-RIPE Tel: +3130-6340430 Fax: +3130-634...

...r sites it has started just going away. > no core file (yes, ulimit is configured), nothing in any of its > (several) log files. it's just gone. > > running it under strace until it dies reveals that every thread has > been given a SIGKILL. > > How does one figure out who deliverd a SIGKILL? For other, non-fatal, > signals it is possible to glean the PID of the sending process in a > signal handler, but obviously you can't do that for SIGKILL because > the app doesn't survive the signal. > > I'm grasping at straws here, and am open to almost any...

...sites it has started just going away. > no core file (yes, ulimit is configured), nothing in any of its > (several) log files. it's just gone. > > running it under strace until it dies reveals that every thread has > been given a SIGKILL. > > How does one figure out who deliverd a SIGKILL? For other, non-fatal, > signals it is possible to glean the PID of the sending process in a > signal handler, but obviously you can't do that for SIGKILL because > the app doesn't survive the signal. > > I'm grasping at straws here, and am open to almost a...

...3(CC), INTO (CE) instruction emulation. It is + * not intended for the delivery of event due to emulation + * of INT nn (CD nn) instruction, which should use + * X86_EVENTTYPE_SW_INTERRUPT as interrupt type; opcode + * 0xf1 generated #DB should use privileged software + * exception, which is not deliverd here either. + * The caller of this function should set correct instruction + * length. + */ void vmx_inject_hw_exception(int trap, int error_code) { unsigned long intr_info; @@ -1365,7 +1378,6 @@ void vmx_inject_hw_exception(int trap, i switch ( trap ) { case TRAP_debug: -...

...Here is the bottomline: ---------------------- The real need is for a commercially deployable solution that can create a business, without too many additions to it. Bicom Systems has promised for too long that their Pbxware and Switchware can fullfill this need to create a business, but they never deliverd their promise. PBXware and Switchware have been a total and expensive disappointment to me and for the few who invested in them. The story is similar with Thirdlane Technologies who promised a good Asterisk Management Interface but they have not been able to deliver a mature GUI to manage Asterisk...

...r sites it has started just going away. > no core file (yes, ulimit is configured), nothing in any of its > (several) log files. it's just gone. > > running it under strace until it dies reveals that every thread has > been given a SIGKILL. > > How does one figure out who deliverd a SIGKILL? For other, non-fatal, > signals it is possible to glean the PID of the sending process in a > signal handler, but obviously you can't do that for SIGKILL because > the app doesn't survive the signal. > > I'm grasping at straws here, and am open to almost any...

...r sites it has started just going away. > no core file (yes, ulimit is configured), nothing in any of its > (several) log files. it's just gone. > > running it under strace until it dies reveals that every thread has > been given a SIGKILL. > > How does one figure out who deliverd a SIGKILL? For other, non-fatal, > signals it is possible to glean the PID of the sending process in a > signal handler, but obviously you can't do that for SIGKILL because > the app doesn't survive the signal. > > I'm grasping at straws here, and am open to almost any...

We''re a J2EE development shop in Vancouver, BC, Canada, and are taking a serious look at Ruby on Rails for some major projects. We''re looking for a consultant with extensive (5+ years) J2EE application development experience, who has deliverd one or more Ruby on Rails projects. Initially we are looking for someone to provide 3-5 days of on-site consulting to work with our programmers. Additional consulting work, on or off site, may be needed. Please contact: Alex Hamer, PMP Web Project Manager aham@tu-group.com --------------------...

...he issue occurred, all further requests fail with the following lines in debug output (loglevel 10): Could not lookup sid S-1-5-21-1710691794-657421245-3729435916-358021: NT_STATUS_PIPE_BROKEN wb_request_done[28456:LOOKUPSID]: NT_STATUS_PIPE_BROKEN winbind_client_response_written[28456:LOOKUPSID]: deliverd response to client Right now we don't understand really what is going on. So, the big question is: What could cause the broken pipe message? And what expression should I search the logfile for to get more information about the possible reasons? I would appreciate any assumptions about the rea...