Displaying 20 results from an estimated 15513 matches for "declar".
Did you mean:
declare
2008 Jun 07
2
[PATCH] fix issues from latest commits
hi,
attacched a couple of patches that fix:
- a variable may be used unitialized in swfdec_audio_decoder.c
- swfdec_init.c got referenced in swfdec/Makefile.am but it's not in
git, i've removed it but maybe the right fix is to add it instead
Still not able to compile swfdec (shadow warnings), will follow other
patches if you don't beat me to it.
cheers,
rm
-------------- next
2013 Mar 07
1
install error - Netcdf library (linux)
...***************************************************************************
** libs
gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBUG -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -fpic -O2 -pipe -g -c ncdf.c -o ncdf.o
ncdf.c: In function ?R_nc4_nctype_to_Rtypecode?:
ncdf.c:40:18: error: ?NC_INT? undeclared (first use in this function)
ncdf.c:40:18: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
ncdf.c:49:18: error: ?NC_UBYTE? undeclared (first use in this function)
ncdf.c:51:18: error: ?NC_USHORT? undeclared (first use in this function)
ncdf.c:53:18: error: ?...
2012 May 22
4
[LLVMdev] How to get llvm bitcode executed
Hi All,
I have a program that uses C++ STL a lot. To have the source code for
STL functions, I undefined "_GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE" in
c++config.h. In spite of this, after compilation (via clang) and
linking (via llvm-ld), the resulting bitcode contains a few declared
functions (with no definitions).
My question is: In the scenario where some function definitions are
missing in a llvm bitcode, can we get a way to run this module via llc
or lli? Or is there any way to make these function definitions
available in the llvm bitcode?
Specifically, these missing...
2015 Feb 13
1
Getting strange message in terminal
Dear all
when I am login in terminal I am getting following message.
declare -x ALL_PROXY="socks://hproxy.iitm.ac.in:3128/"
declare -x AMBERHOME="/sware/amber/amber12"
declare -x COLORTERM="gnome-terminal"
declare -x CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/bin/include"
declare -x
DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS="unix:abstract=/tmp/dbus-adjIuc8A5l,guid=...
2012 Nov 01
0
[LLVMdev] printing debug info
...d debug info:
* source/line/col information
* original variable name
* original type name
But the following is the output I get. It has no source file names. It
does not print any instructions. It only prints function and variable names:
function main
:
; %2 is variable argc of type int declared at :10
; %3 is variable argv of type declared at :10
; %N is variable N of type unsigned int declared at :13
; %i is variable i of type unsigned int declared at :17
; %2 is variable argc of type int declared at :10
; %3 is variable argv of type declared at :10
; %3 is variable argv of type dec...
2013 Mar 07
0
install Netcdf library (linux)
...***************************************************************************
** libs
gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBUG -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -fpic -O2 -pipe -g -c ncdf.c -o ncdf.o
ncdf.c: In function ?R_nc4_nctype_to_Rtypecode?:
ncdf.c:40:18: error: ?NC_INT? undeclared (first use in this function)
ncdf.c:40:18: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
ncdf.c:49:18: error: ?NC_UBYTE? undeclared (first use in this function)
ncdf.c:51:18: error: ?NC_USHORT? undeclared (first use in this function)
ncdf.c:53:18: error: ?...
2001 Feb 01
0
warnings on aix325
Hi,
I'm trying to compile openssh2.3.0p1 on aix3.2.5.
Can I ignore this list of warning messages?
bsd-bindresvport.c: In function `bindresvport_af':
bsd-bindresvport.c:94: warning: implicit declaration of function `bind'
bsd-rresvport.c: In function `rresvport_af':
bsd-rresvport.c:64: warning: implicit declaration of function `bzero'
bsd-rresvport.c:82: warning: implicit declaration of function `socket'
bsd-rresvport.c:88: warning: implicit declaration of function `bind'...
2010 Mar 23
0
[LLVMdev] Cygwin llvm-gcc-4.2 regression
...r-list before 'w
int_t'
In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:65,
from /home/ang/src/llvm-gcc4.2-2.7.source/gcc/tsystem.h:90,
from /home/ang/src/llvm-gcc4.2-2.7.source/gcc/config/i386/cygmi
ng-crtbegin.c:37:
/usr/include/sys/stdio.h:38: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' bef
ore 'size_t'
/usr/include/sys/stdio.h:39: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' bef
ore 'size_t'
In file included from /home/ang/src/llvm-gcc4.2-2.7.source/gcc/tsystem.h:90,
from /home/ang/src/llvm-gcc4.2-2.7.so...
2012 May 22
0
[LLVMdev] How to get llvm bitcode executed
...t; Hi All,
>
> I have a program that uses C++ STL a lot. To have the source code for
> STL functions, I undefined "_GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE" in
> c++config.h. In spite of this, after compilation (via clang) and
> linking (via llvm-ld), the resulting bitcode contains a few declared
> functions (with no definitions).
>
> My question is: In the scenario where some function definitions are
> missing in a llvm bitcode, can we get a way to run this module via llc
> or lli? Or is there any way to make these function definitions
> available in the llvm bitcode?...
2018 Feb 06
2
libc++ cross-compile linux-armv7 and math function problems
...:305:0,
from ../projects/libcxx/include/random:1638,
from ../projects/libcxx/src/algorithm.cpp:11:
../projects/libcxx/include/math.h: In function 'long double abs(long
double)':
../projects/libcxx/include/math.h:742:45: error: '::fabsl' has not been
declared
abs(long double __lcpp_x) _NOEXCEPT {return ::fabsl(__lcpp_x);}
^~
../projects/libcxx/include/math.h: In function 'long double acos(long
double)':
../projects/libcxx/include/math.h:749:91: error: '::acosl' has not been
declared
inline...
2011 Sep 17
0
[LLVMdev] Build errors on r139985
...ug.cpp for Debug+Asserts build
llvm[1]: Compiling DeltaAlgorithm.cpp for Debug+Asserts build
llvm[1]: Compiling Disassembler.cpp for Debug+Asserts build
In file included from CommandLine.cpp:25:
/home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0/llvm/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:499:
error: ‘EAFNOSUPPORT’ was not declared in this scope
/home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0/llvm/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:500:
error: ‘EADDRINUSE’ was not declared in this scope
/home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0/llvm/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:501:
error: ‘EADDRNOTAVAIL’ was not declared in this scope
/home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0...
2010 Mar 18
0
Errors compiling speex1.2-rc1 in Symbian 3th edition SDK
...nare\speex-1.2rc1\speex-1.2rc1\symbian\WINSCW.make" LIBRARY VERBOSE=-s
make -s -r -f "\S60\devices\S60_3rd_FP2_SDK_v1.1\EPOC32\BUILD\Users\Maurizio\University\ProgettoInterdisciplinare\speex-1.2rc1\speex-1.2rc1\symbian\SPEEX\WINSCW\SPEEX.WINSCW" LIBRARY
bits.c
..\libspeex\bits.c:48: declaration syntax error
..\libspeex\bits.c:49: declaration syntax error
..\libspeex\bits.c:54: declaration syntax error
..\libspeex\bits.c:56: declaration syntax error
..\libspeex\bits.c:58: identifier 'speex_bits_reset(struct SpeexBits *)' redeclared
..\libspeex\bits.c:58: was declared as: '...
2018 Feb 06
0
libc++ cross-compile linux-armv7 and math function problems
...from ../projects/libcxx/include/random:1638,
> from ../projects/libcxx/src/algorithm.cpp:11:
> ../projects/libcxx/include/math.h: In function 'long double abs(long double)':
> ../projects/libcxx/include/math.h:742:45: error: '::fabsl' has not been declared
> abs(long double __lcpp_x) _NOEXCEPT {return ::fabsl(__lcpp_x);}
> ^~
> ../projects/libcxx/include/math.h: In function 'long double acos(long double)':
> ../projects/libcxx/include/math.h:749:91: error: '::acosl' has not b...
2010 Dec 14
8
builder-ubuntu febootstrap success 85db2a664c820e01a02ddc3b33b3da26fe05dc5b
.... yes
checking for time.h... yes
checking sys/time.h usability... yes
checking sys/time.h presence... yes
checking for sys/time.h... yes
checking whether system is Windows or MSDOS... no
checking whether // is distinct from /... no
checking for complete errno.h... yes
checking whether strerror_r is declared... yes
checking for strerror_r... yes
checking whether strerror_r returns char *... yes
checking for mode_t... yes
checking for promoted mode_t type... mode_t
checking for working fcntl.h... yes
checking whether lstat correctly handles trailing slash... yes
checking whether unlink honors trailing...
2011 Jan 14
7
builder-ubuntu febootstrap success 85db2a664c820e01a02ddc3b33b3da26fe05dc5b
.... yes
checking for time.h... yes
checking sys/time.h usability... yes
checking sys/time.h presence... yes
checking for sys/time.h... yes
checking whether system is Windows or MSDOS... no
checking whether // is distinct from /... no
checking for complete errno.h... yes
checking whether strerror_r is declared... yes
checking for strerror_r... yes
checking whether strerror_r returns char *... yes
checking for mode_t... yes
checking for promoted mode_t type... mode_t
checking for working fcntl.h... yes
checking whether lstat correctly handles trailing slash... yes
checking whether unlink honors trailing...
2011 Feb 15
7
builder-ubuntu febootstrap success 85db2a664c820e01a02ddc3b33b3da26fe05dc5b
.... yes
checking for time.h... yes
checking sys/time.h usability... yes
checking sys/time.h presence... yes
checking for sys/time.h... yes
checking whether system is Windows or MSDOS... no
checking whether // is distinct from /... no
checking for complete errno.h... yes
checking whether strerror_r is declared... yes
checking for strerror_r... yes
checking whether strerror_r returns char *... yes
checking for mode_t... yes
checking for promoted mode_t type... mode_t
checking for working fcntl.h... yes
checking whether lstat correctly handles trailing slash... yes
checking whether unlink honors trailing...
2011 Jan 14
7
builder-debian febootstrap success 85db2a664c820e01a02ddc3b33b3da26fe05dc5b
.... yes
checking for time.h... yes
checking sys/time.h usability... yes
checking sys/time.h presence... yes
checking for sys/time.h... yes
checking whether system is Windows or MSDOS... no
checking whether // is distinct from /... no
checking for complete errno.h... yes
checking whether strerror_r is declared... yes
checking for strerror_r... yes
checking whether strerror_r returns char *... yes
checking for mode_t... yes
checking for promoted mode_t type... mode_t
checking for working fcntl.h... yes
checking whether lstat correctly handles trailing slash... yes
checking whether unlink honors trailing...
2011 Feb 15
7
builder-debian febootstrap success 85db2a664c820e01a02ddc3b33b3da26fe05dc5b
.... yes
checking for time.h... yes
checking sys/time.h usability... yes
checking sys/time.h presence... yes
checking for sys/time.h... yes
checking whether system is Windows or MSDOS... no
checking whether // is distinct from /... no
checking for complete errno.h... yes
checking whether strerror_r is declared... yes
checking for strerror_r... yes
checking whether strerror_r returns char *... yes
checking for mode_t... yes
checking for promoted mode_t type... mode_t
checking for working fcntl.h... yes
checking whether lstat correctly handles trailing slash... yes
checking whether unlink honors trailing...
2010 Dec 14
7
builder-debian febootstrap success 85db2a664c820e01a02ddc3b33b3da26fe05dc5b
.... yes
checking for time.h... yes
checking sys/time.h usability... yes
checking sys/time.h presence... yes
checking for sys/time.h... yes
checking whether system is Windows or MSDOS... no
checking whether // is distinct from /... no
checking for complete errno.h... yes
checking whether strerror_r is declared... yes
checking for strerror_r... yes
checking whether strerror_r returns char *... yes
checking for mode_t... yes
checking for promoted mode_t type... mode_t
checking for working fcntl.h... yes
checking whether lstat correctly handles trailing slash... yes
checking whether unlink honors trailing...
2012 May 22
2
[LLVMdev] How to get llvm bitcode executed
...t; > I have a program that uses C++ STL a lot. To have the source code for
> > STL functions, I undefined "_GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE" in
> > c++config.h. In spite of this, after compilation (via clang) and
> > linking (via llvm-ld), the resulting bitcode contains a few declared
> > functions (with no definitions).
> >
> > My question is: In the scenario where some function definitions are
> > missing in a llvm bitcode, can we get a way to run this module via llc
> > or lli? Or is there any way to make these function definitions
> > av...