search for: declare

hi, attacched a couple of patches that fix: - a variable may be used unitialized in swfdec_audio_decoder.c - swfdec_init.c got referenced in swfdec/Makefile.am but it's not in git, i've removed it but maybe the right fix is to add it instead Still not able to compile swfdec (shadow warnings), will follow other patches if you don't beat me to it. cheers, rm -------------- next

...*************************************************************************** ** libs gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBUG -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -fpic -O2 -pipe -g -c ncdf.c -o ncdf.o ncdf.c: In function ?R_nc4_nctype_to_Rtypecode?: ncdf.c:40:18: error: ?NC_INT? undeclared (first use in this function) ncdf.c:40:18: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in ncdf.c:49:18: error: ?NC_UBYTE? undeclared (first use in this function) ncdf.c:51:18: error: ?NC_USHORT? undeclared (first use in this function) ncdf.c:53:18: error: ?N...

Hi All, I have a program that uses C++ STL a lot. To have the source code for STL functions, I undefined "_GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE" in c++config.h. In spite of this, after compilation (via clang) and linking (via llvm-ld), the resulting bitcode contains a few declared functions (with no definitions). My question is: In the scenario where some function definitions are missing in a llvm bitcode, can we get a way to run this module via llc or lli? Or is there any way to make these function definitions available in the llvm bitcode? Specifically, these missing f...

Dear all when I am login in terminal I am getting following message. declare -x ALL_PROXY="socks://hproxy.iitm.ac.in:3128/" declare -x AMBERHOME="/sware/amber/amber12" declare -x COLORTERM="gnome-terminal" declare -x CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/bin/include" declare -x DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS="unix:abstract=/tmp/dbus-adjIuc8A5l,guid=d...

...d debug info: * source/line/col information * original variable name * original type name But the following is the output I get. It has no source file names. It does not print any instructions. It only prints function and variable names: function main : ; %2 is variable argc of type int declared at :10 ; %3 is variable argv of type declared at :10 ; %N is variable N of type unsigned int declared at :13 ; %i is variable i of type unsigned int declared at :17 ; %2 is variable argc of type int declared at :10 ; %3 is variable argv of type declared at :10 ; %3 is variable argv of type decl...

...*************************************************************************** ** libs gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBUG -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -fpic -O2 -pipe -g -c ncdf.c -o ncdf.o ncdf.c: In function ?R_nc4_nctype_to_Rtypecode?: ncdf.c:40:18: error: ?NC_INT? undeclared (first use in this function) ncdf.c:40:18: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in ncdf.c:49:18: error: ?NC_UBYTE? undeclared (first use in this function) ncdf.c:51:18: error: ?NC_USHORT? undeclared (first use in this function) ncdf.c:53:18: error: ?N...

...ething': serverloop.c:197: warning: implicit declaration of function `bzero' serverloop.c: In function `process_output': serverloop.c:350: warning: implicit declaration of function `shutdown' In file included from session.c:60: /usr/include/usersec.h:88: warning: `struct userpw' declared inside parameter list /usr/include/usersec.h:88: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, /usr/include/usersec.h:88: warning: which is probably not what you want. session.c: In function `do_exec_no_pty': session.c:474: warning: implicit declaration of function `socketpair'...

Hi, I don't seem to be able to solve this regression with llvm-gcc-4.2 on Cygwin. It is weird as I thought I had checked SVN TOT and had a good build just before the branch was corrected, so am confused. If someone more experienced with debugging could have a look at this, its like a syntax error. I have tried whittling the error down but it just moves. Trying to bisect between r98185 and

...t; Hi All, > > I have a program that uses C++ STL a lot. To have the source code for > STL functions, I undefined "_GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE" in > c++config.h. In spite of this, after compilation (via clang) and > linking (via llvm-ld), the resulting bitcode contains a few declared > functions (with no definitions). > > My question is: In the scenario where some function definitions are > missing in a llvm bitcode, can we get a way to run this module via llc > or lli? Or is there any way to make these function definitions > available in the llvm bitcode?...

...:305:0, from ../projects/libcxx/include/random:1638, from ../projects/libcxx/src/algorithm.cpp:11: ../projects/libcxx/include/math.h: In function 'long double abs(long double)': ../projects/libcxx/include/math.h:742:45: error: '::fabsl' has not been declared abs(long double __lcpp_x) _NOEXCEPT {return ::fabsl(__lcpp_x);} ^~ ../projects/libcxx/include/math.h: In function 'long double acos(long double)': ../projects/libcxx/include/math.h:749:91: error: '::acosl' has not been declared inline...

...ug.cpp for Debug+Asserts build llvm[1]: Compiling DeltaAlgorithm.cpp for Debug+Asserts build llvm[1]: Compiling Disassembler.cpp for Debug+Asserts build In file included from CommandLine.cpp:25: /home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0/llvm/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:499: error: ‘EAFNOSUPPORT’ was not declared in this scope /home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0/llvm/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:500: error: ‘EADDRINUSE’ was not declared in this scope /home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0/llvm/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:501: error: ‘EADDRNOTAVAIL’ was not declared in this scope /home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0/...

...SCW" LIBRARY bits.c ..\libspeex\bits.c:48: declaration syntax error ..\libspeex\bits.c:49: declaration syntax error ..\libspeex\bits.c:54: declaration syntax error ..\libspeex\bits.c:56: declaration syntax error ..\libspeex\bits.c:58: identifier 'speex_bits_reset(struct SpeexBits *)' redeclared ..\libspeex\bits.c:58: was declared as: 'void (struct SpeexBits *)' ..\libspeex\bits.c:58: now declared as: 'int (...)' ..\libspeex\bits.c:59: identifier expected ..\libspeex\bits.c:59: '{' expected ..\libspeex\bits.c:61: expression syntax error ..\libspeex\bits.c:64: expre...

...from ../projects/libcxx/include/random:1638, > from ../projects/libcxx/src/algorithm.cpp:11: > ../projects/libcxx/include/math.h: In function 'long double abs(long double)': > ../projects/libcxx/include/math.h:742:45: error: '::fabsl' has not been declared > abs(long double __lcpp_x) _NOEXCEPT {return ::fabsl(__lcpp_x);} > ^~ > ../projects/libcxx/include/math.h: In function 'long double acos(long double)': > ../projects/libcxx/include/math.h:749:91: error: '::acosl' has not be...

.... yes checking for time.h... yes checking sys/time.h usability... yes checking sys/time.h presence... yes checking for sys/time.h... yes checking whether system is Windows or MSDOS... no checking whether // is distinct from /... no checking for complete errno.h... yes checking whether strerror_r is declared... yes checking for strerror_r... yes checking whether strerror_r returns char *... yes checking for mode_t... yes checking for promoted mode_t type... mode_t checking for working fcntl.h... yes checking whether lstat correctly handles trailing slash... yes checking whether unlink honors trailing...

.... yes checking for time.h... yes checking sys/time.h usability... yes checking sys/time.h presence... yes checking for sys/time.h... yes checking whether system is Windows or MSDOS... no checking whether // is distinct from /... no checking for complete errno.h... yes checking whether strerror_r is declared... yes checking for strerror_r... yes checking whether strerror_r returns char *... yes checking for mode_t... yes checking for promoted mode_t type... mode_t checking for working fcntl.h... yes checking whether lstat correctly handles trailing slash... yes checking whether unlink honors trailing...

.... yes checking for time.h... yes checking sys/time.h usability... yes checking sys/time.h presence... yes checking for sys/time.h... yes checking whether system is Windows or MSDOS... no checking whether // is distinct from /... no checking for complete errno.h... yes checking whether strerror_r is declared... yes checking for strerror_r... yes checking whether strerror_r returns char *... yes checking for mode_t... yes checking for promoted mode_t type... mode_t checking for working fcntl.h... yes checking whether lstat correctly handles trailing slash... yes checking whether unlink honors trailing...

.... yes checking for time.h... yes checking sys/time.h usability... yes checking sys/time.h presence... yes checking for sys/time.h... yes checking whether system is Windows or MSDOS... no checking whether // is distinct from /... no checking for complete errno.h... yes checking whether strerror_r is declared... yes checking for strerror_r... yes checking whether strerror_r returns char *... yes checking for mode_t... yes checking for promoted mode_t type... mode_t checking for working fcntl.h... yes checking whether lstat correctly handles trailing slash... yes checking whether unlink honors trailing...

.... yes checking for time.h... yes checking sys/time.h usability... yes checking sys/time.h presence... yes checking for sys/time.h... yes checking whether system is Windows or MSDOS... no checking whether // is distinct from /... no checking for complete errno.h... yes checking whether strerror_r is declared... yes checking for strerror_r... yes checking whether strerror_r returns char *... yes checking for mode_t... yes checking for promoted mode_t type... mode_t checking for working fcntl.h... yes checking whether lstat correctly handles trailing slash... yes checking whether unlink honors trailing...

.... yes checking for time.h... yes checking sys/time.h usability... yes checking sys/time.h presence... yes checking for sys/time.h... yes checking whether system is Windows or MSDOS... no checking whether // is distinct from /... no checking for complete errno.h... yes checking whether strerror_r is declared... yes checking for strerror_r... yes checking whether strerror_r returns char *... yes checking for mode_t... yes checking for promoted mode_t type... mode_t checking for working fcntl.h... yes checking whether lstat correctly handles trailing slash... yes checking whether unlink honors trailing...

...t; > I have a program that uses C++ STL a lot. To have the source code for > > STL functions, I undefined "_GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE" in > > c++config.h. In spite of this, after compilation (via clang) and > > linking (via llvm-ld), the resulting bitcode contains a few declared > > functions (with no definitions). > > > > My question is: In the scenario where some function definitions are > > missing in a llvm bitcode, can we get a way to run this module via llc > > or lli? Or is there any way to make these function definitions > > ava...