search for: debranded

The subscription-manager dnf plugin is disabled by default as part of our debranding in both CentOS Linux and CentOS Stream. c8: https://git.centos.org/rpms/subscription-manager/blob/580aca8629536c64577e6a443b9349ecb629cc17/f/SPECS/subscription-manager.spec#_850 c8s:

On 06/17/2016 01:42 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:32:19 +0100 > Ned Slider wrote: > >>> Johnny's announcement refers to: >>> firefox-45.2.0-1.el5.centos.src.rpm >>> firefox-45.2.0-1.el6.centos.src.rpm >>> firefox-45.2.0-1.el7.centos.src.rpm >>> >>> The linked rhel webpage refers to: >>>

On 2023-07-20 04:36, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > > my predict is that they will continue as a #rebuilder / #freeloader, > writing software is a hard work. > #offensive terms to the community :-), hide hat wrote it. No, they didn't. That term was bandied about on social media by people who were speculating about the reasoning behind discontinuing the practice of debranding

In another recent thread,[1] someone was having trouble with the yum-plugin-fastestmirror feature, so I suggested he remove it, since it?s just a plugin and should therefore be optional. He reported that it couldn?t be removed due to package dependencies. I investigated further and found that this also affects CentOS 5.11 and CentOS 7.2. (The OP is on CentOS 6.8.) So, I reported it as a bug

On 2023-07-22 09:55, frank saporito wrote: > On 7/22/23 02:29, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> From my point of view, Red Hat doesn't really sell software. They >> give away software.? All of their software is available at no charge, >> typically in an unbranded release.? What Red Hat sells is support. > > Does Red Hat give away software anymore? Yes?? I'm not aware

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:32:19 +0100 Ned Slider wrote: > > Johnny's announcement refers to: > > firefox-45.2.0-1.el5.centos.src.rpm > > firefox-45.2.0-1.el6.centos.src.rpm > > firefox-45.2.0-1.el7.centos.src.rpm > > > > The linked rhel webpage refers to: > > firefox-45.2.0-1.el5_11.src.rpm > > firefox-45.2.0-1.el6_8.src.rpm > >

I subscribe (pay) for a lot of things personally. Music, Movies, Anti Virus, VPN, Storage, etc. But for my business, I do not want to pay Red Hat, Zimbra, or Google Workspace. Why ? Because the general rule seems to be Oh! You are an individual, we will offer you affordable/free service What! You are a business, we will offer you extremely 'unaffordable' service. Because being a

On 17/06/16 20:04, Warren Young wrote: > In another recent thread,[1] someone was having trouble with the yum-plugin-fastestmirror feature, so I suggested he remove it, since it?s just a plugin and should therefore be optional. He reported that it couldn?t be removed due to package dependencies. > > I investigated further and found that this also affects CentOS 5.11 and CentOS 7.2. (The

I was wondering what people's opinions are on running the CR repository on production systems? I'm currently predisposed to not do it since it indicates it hasn't fully gone through QA yet. But from my understanding except for the alt-arch systems these are just recompiles of the redhat RPMs after debranding right? I'm Curious how other people are treating this repository since,

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:00 PM Carl George <carl at redhat.com> wrote: > The subscription-manager dnf plugin is disabled by default as part of > our debranding in both CentOS Linux and CentOS Stream. > > c8: > https://git.centos.org/rpms/subscription-manager/blob/580aca8629536c64577e6a443b9349ecb629cc17/f/SPECS/subscription-manager.spec#_850 > c8s >

> I can't predict the future but my feeling is that AlmaLinux has a good > chance to become the second Gold standard. I disagree with you. Both Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux are in a very comfortable position, and they will likely stay that way. my predict is that they will continue as a #rebuilder / #freeloader, writing software is a hard work. SuSe hardfork will probably be only an

Thanks for the replies. I understood that a major part of testing being done by Redhat. But after repackaging the sources how doest CentOS make sure the integrity of the product. Is it being done by a dedicated team or by community ? On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 09:49:42AM +0530, Sudhi wrote: > >

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:13?AM Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2023-07-22 09:55, frank saporito wrote: > > On 7/22/23 02:29, Gordon Messmer wrote: > >> From my point of view, Red Hat doesn't really sell software. They > >> give away software. All of their software is available at no charge, > >> typically in an

Hi, I help run an NPR/PBS station. We were running ice cast before our most recent upgrade. However after the upgrade we have now been receiving sporadic reports of people being unable to connect. The only confirmed issue is with Saffari on Windows. We are working on that specific one. But I've also received sporadic reports from users on chrome, firefox, mac, and windows and various other

On 7/24/23 10:12, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 2023-07-22 09:55, frank saporito wrote: >> On 7/22/23 02:29, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> From my point of view, Red Hat doesn't really sell software. They >>> give away software.? All of their software is available at no >>> charge, typically in an unbranded release.? What Red Hat sells is >>> support.

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:49:29 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > What appears is below. Removing dependent packages is required. Removing unused dependencies is optional. dnf remove *subscription* --noautoremove should remove the dependent packages but keep thee unused dependencies if you want them. There's also a setting in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf to set the default behaviour of the autoremove

On 7/22/23 02:29, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 2023-07-21 00:30, Lee Thomas Stephen wrote: >> But for my business, I do not want to pay Red Hat, Zimbra, or Google >> Workspace. >> Why ? >> Because the general rule seems to be >> Oh! You are an individual, we will offer you affordable/free service >> What! You are a business, we will offer you extremely