search for: dalej

The only Transforms check that fails is LLVM :: Transforms/GVN/null-aliases-nothing.ll Could that be related? On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:50 PM, dalej <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 2, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Scott Ricketts wrote: > >> My install went fine except for some failures during make check >> (Unexpected Failures: 92). All failures were in one of the following: >> >> LLVM::FrontendC++ >> LLV...

...did try: llvm-gcc --emit-llvm -c sumarray.c -o sumarray.bc llc -march=ppc32 sumarray.bc gcc -arch ppc sumarray.s And this produced a ppc binary that worked (at least in this case). Do you know if this approach is worthwhile? Thx, Jose -----Original Message----- From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 2:50 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Dale Johannesen; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question llvm-gcc-4.0 is no longer maintained. Use llvm-gcc-4.2. On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi, > > I am using...

On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:30 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > > wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> > wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from > another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> > > Okay, thanks. Thre should be be...

On Oct 11, 2008, at 12:49 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > On Friday 10 October 2008 20:29:49 Michael wrote: >> What command and options should be used to convert C++ to C? > > Try this: > > llvm-gcc -c -O3 -emit-llvm file.cpp -o - | llc -march=c -o - > > It should spray C code to standard out. Bear in mind that if you use features from the C++ library, you are still going

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > No, C only requires support for objects up to 65535 bytes in size.  C99 5.2.4.1. 65535 bytes would be reasonably sufficient; what's the largest supported by the LLVM code generator?

Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:30 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com<mailto:aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com>> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com<mailto:dalej at apple.com>> wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from > another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> > > Okay,...

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On May 12, 2009, at 3:09 PMPDT, OvermindDL1 wrote: > >> The error given: >> >> ..\..\..\..\trunk\lib\Transforms\Scalar\LoopStrengthReduce.cpp(1016) : >> error C2668: 'abs' : ambiguous call to overloaded function >> >>...

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On May 12, 2009, at 5:01 PMPDT, OvermindDL1 wrote: > >> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On May 12, 2009, at 3:09 PMPDT, OvermindDL1 wrote: >>> >>>> T...

Thanks again, Dale. Hopefully, someone has the answer. Jose -----Original Message----- From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:52 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Dale Johannesen Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question On Jan 29, 2010, at 3:13 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi Dale, > > Is there a way to get llvm 4.2 and os x 10.4 to work together? I am > trying to bui...

Thanks. I could take a look at the lines and all of them have smull instruction like 'smull r0, r1, r0, r1'. Won On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 8, 2009, at 12:52 PMPDT, Won J Jeon wrote: > > I tried a couple of options (-mcpu=arm1136j-s, -mcpu=arm1136jf-s, > -march=armv6, ...) to let the compile know the specific ARM processor, but > the same issue is still there. I tried to take a lo...

...compile know the specific ARM processor, but the same issue is still there. I tried to take a look at .s file in /tmp directory, but it's already cleaned up. Is it because I enabled the optimization option when I compiled llvm? Regards, Won On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:04 AMPDT, Won J Jeon wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I built a llvm toolchain for ARM and I'm trying to build a simple > > application on ARM using LLVM. When I compiled the code, it has the > > following mess...

...9 PMPDT, Jeff Kunkel wrote: > Is there any way to tell where in the Instruction list, the branch > to the other MachineBasicBlock happens? I know in the BasicBlock had > a nice api for it. > > Thanks, > Jeff Kunkel > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> > wrote: > > On Sep 2, 2010, at 2:44 PMPDT, Jeff Kunkel wrote: > I need to track which MachineBasicBlocks branch into other > MachineBasicBlocks. How do I do it? > > Look at the Predecessor/Successor lists, which are target-independent > > > I see...

On May 12, 2009, at 5:01 PMPDT, OvermindDL1 wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> > wrote: >> >> On May 12, 2009, at 3:09 PMPDT, OvermindDL1 wrote: >> >>> The error given: >>> >>> ..\..\..\..\trunk\lib\Transforms\Scalar >>> \LoopStrengthReduce.cpp(1016) : >>> error C2668: 'abs' : ambigu...

...gainst today's trunk. However, I'm seeing 28 unexpected failing tests in llvm/test on x86 Linux 64 today. But it's the same on an unmodified tree, so I guess I'm still okay. It passed at one point for me with these changes. -John On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 1, 2010, at 11:03 AMPDT, John Thompson wrote: > > I'm close to confirming that I get the equivalent results from the > test-suite with my changes, compared to a fresh tree, on a Linux x86 64 > bit box. > > When that is the case, may...

...2.40 -- S 470.lbm -- 6.52 -- S 481.wrf -- 0.00140 RE 482.sphinx3 -- 3.19 -- S On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 22, 2010, at 4:18 PMPDT, Reza Yazdani wrote: > > Hi, >> >> I ran Spec2006 with -O4. All integer benchmarks passed, but only 8 out 17 >> of floating point benchmarks passed. Is this normal or I made a mistake in >> my build? &...

...ever, I'm seeing 28 unexpected failing tests in llvm/test on x86 > Linux 64 today. But it's the same on an unmodified tree, so I guess > I'm still okay. It passed at one point for me with these changes. > > -John > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> > wrote: > > On Sep 1, 2010, at 11:03 AMPDT, John Thompson wrote: > >> I'm close to confirming that I get the equivalent results from the >> test-suite with my changes, compared to a fresh tree, on a Linux >> x86 64 bit box. >> >>...

...on't work in the general case, because there are things about the ABI, such as calling convention, that are embedded in the .bc file. The front end needs to know you're targeting ppc. > Thx, > > Jose > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] > Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 2:50 PM > To: Jose Rangel > Cc: Dale Johannesen; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question > > llvm-gcc-4.0 is no longer maintained. Use llvm-gcc-4.2. > > On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel...

...using the 10.4 sdk wouldn't work, once you get it to build. Don't bother with llvm-gcc-4.0; for one thing, it had some PPC ABI bugs that are fixed in llvm-gcc-4.2. Has anybody built for the environment Jose is targeting? -----Original Message----- From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:52 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Dale Johannesen Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question On Jan 29, 2010, at 3:13 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi Dale, > > Is there a way to get llvm 4.2 and os x 10.4 to work together? I am > trying to bui...

...Size is true. It > assumes that otherwise things can get lowered to PSHUFD (which is true for > v4i32 and v4f32 but nothing else - in particular MMX operations). > > I'll file a bug now... > > Nicolas > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:37 > To: Bill Wendling > Cc: Dale Johannesen; Reid Kleckner; Nicolas Capens; LLVM Developers Mailing > List > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM 2.8 and MMX > > > On Sep 21, 2010, at 5:30 PMPDT, Bill Wendling wrote: > >&gt...

...optimization option when I compiled llvm? Use -S to keep the assembly file around. You don't seem to be very familiar with compilers, please try to figure things like this out from the documentation first. > Regards, > Won > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> > wrote: > > On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:04 AMPDT, Won J Jeon wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I built a llvm toolchain for ARM and I'm trying to build a simple > > application on ARM using LLVM. When I compiled the code, it has the > > followin...