Hi, I ran Spec2006 with -O4. All integer benchmarks passed, but only 8 out 17 of floating point benchmarks passed. Is this normal or I made a mistake in my build? Reza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100722/4c4a81a9/attachment.html>
On Jul 22, 2010, at 4:18 PMPDT, Reza Yazdani wrote:> Hi, > > I ran Spec2006 with -O4. All integer benchmarks passed, but only 8 > out 17 of floating point benchmarks passed. Is this normal or I > made a mistake in my build?Hi Reza. Somebody on Linux should answer, but I don't think it's normal. You may have checked out the source at a moment when it had a bug in it; that unfortunately happens frequently. Which ones are failing?
Estimated Estimated
Base Base Base Peak Peak Peak
Benchmarks Ref. Run Time Ratio Ref. Run Time Ratio
-------------- ------ --------- --------- ------ --------- ---------
410.bwaves -- 0.0194
RE
416.gamess -- 0.00135
RE
433.milc --
16.5 -- S
434.zeusmp -- 0.00146
RE
435.gromacs -- 0.00138
RE
436.cactusADM -- 0.00135 RE
437.leslie3d --
0.00141 RE
444.namd --
19.4 -- S
447.dealII -- 19.7
-- S
450.soplex -- 0.0380 --
S
453.povray -- 2.49 --
S
454.calculix -- 0.00135
RE
459.GemsFDTD -- 0.00150
RE
465.tonto -- 2.40 --
S
470.lbm -- 6.52 --
S
481.wrf -- 0.00140
RE
482.sphinx3 -- 3.19 --
S
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com>
wrote:
>
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 4:18 PMPDT, Reza Yazdani wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I ran Spec2006 with -O4. All integer benchmarks passed, but only 8 out
17
>> of floating point benchmarks passed. Is this normal or I made a
mistake in
>> my build?
>>
>
> Hi Reza. Somebody on Linux should answer, but I don't think it's
normal.
> You may have checked out the source at a moment when it had a bug in it;
> that unfortunately happens frequently. Which ones are failing?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100723/c2ed8a14/attachment.html>
Following is the list of fp benchmarks that fail. They all pass with -O3,
but some fail with -O4. I did the test run.
Thanks,
Reza
Estimated Estimated
Base Base Base Peak Peak Peak
Benchmarks Ref. Run Time Ratio Ref. Run Time Ratio
-------------- ------ --------- --------- ------ --------- ---------
410.bwaves -- 0.0194
RE
416.gamess -- 0.00135
RE
433.milc -- 16.5 --
S
434.zeusmp -- 0.00146
RE
435.gromacs -- 0.00138
RE
436.cactusADM -- 0.00135
RE
437.leslie3d -- 0.00141
RE
444.namd -- 19.4 --
S
447.dealII -- 19.7 --
S
450.soplex -- 0.0380 --
S
453.povray -- 2.49 --
S
454.calculix -- 0.00135
RE
459.GemsFDTD -- 0.00150
RE
465.tonto -- 2.40 --
S
470.lbm -- 6.52 --
S
481.wrf -- 0.00140
RE
482.sphinx3 -- 3.19 --
S
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com>
wrote:
>
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 4:18 PMPDT, Reza Yazdani wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I ran Spec2006 with -O4. All integer benchmarks passed, but only 8 out
17
>> of floating point benchmarks passed. Is this normal or I made a
mistake in
>> my build?
>>
>
> Hi Reza. Somebody on Linux should answer, but I don't think it's
normal.
> You may have checked out the source at a moment when it had a bug in it;
> that unfortunately happens frequently. Which ones are failing?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100723/9b1f2101/attachment.html>