search for: da5

.../s transfers da3: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present da4 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 2 da4: <Generic USB SM Reader 1.02> Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da4: 40.000MB/s transfers da4: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present da5 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 3 da5: <Generic USB MS Reader 1.03> Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da5: 40.000MB/s transfers da5: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present (da2:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ CAPACITY. CDB: 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (da2:umass-sim0:0:0:0):...

Hi. If I create a zpool with the following command: zpool create tank raidz2 da0 da1 da2 da3 da4 da5 da6 da7 and after a reboot the device names for some reason are changed so da2 and da5 are swapped, either by altering the LUN setting on the storage or by switching cables/swapping disks etc.? How will zfs handle that? Will it simply acknowledge that all devices are present and the pool is intac...

...ice ses0: phy 0: parent 500304800182f4ff addr 500304800182f4ef ses0: probe13,pass5,da4: Element descriptor: 'Slot 05' ses0: probe13,pass5,da4: SAS Device Slot Element: 1 Phys at Slot 4 ses0: phy 0: SATA device ses0: phy 0: parent 500304800182f4ff addr 500304800182f4f0 ses0: probe14,pass6,da5: Element descriptor: 'Slot 06' ses0: probe14,pass6,da5: SAS Device Slot Element: 1 Phys at Slot 5 ses0: phy 0: SATA device ses0: phy 0: parent 500304800182f4ff addr 500304800182f4f1 SMP: AP CPU #3 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #2 Launched! Timecounter "TSC-low"...

...0 0 1 raidz1-0 FAULTED 0 0 6 da1 ONLINE 0 0 0 3419704811362497180 OFFLINE 0 0 0 was /dev/da2 da3 ONLINE 0 0 0 da4 ONLINE 0 0 0 da5 ONLINE 0 0 0 But if I look at the labels on all the online disks I see this: # zdb -ul /dev/da1 | egrep ''(children|path)'' children[0]: path: ''/dev/da1'' children[1]: path: ''/dev/da2&...

Hi All, I am looking at ZFS and I get that they call it RAIDZ which is similar to RAID 5, but what about RAID 10? Isn''t a RAID 10 setup better for data protection? So if I have 8 x 1.5tb drives, wouldn''t I: - mirror drive 1 and 5 - mirror drive 2 and 6 - mirror drive 3 and 7 - mirror drive 4 and 8 Then stripe 1,2,3,4 Then stripe 5,6,7,8 How does one do this with ZFS?

...ing Enabled da3: 4148MB (8496960 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 4148C) da2 at ahc0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da2: <SEAGATE ST34371N 0484> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da2: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15), Tagged Queueing Enabled da2: 4148MB (8496884 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 4148C) da5 at ahc0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 da5: <SEAGATE ST15150N 0023> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da5: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15), Tagged Queueing Enabled da5: 4095MB (8388315 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 4095C) da4 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 da4: <SEAGATE ST15150N 0023> Fix...

...State: up Device /dev/da2a Avail: 3/4094 MB (0%) D disk02 State: up Device /dev/da3a Avail: 3/4094 MB (0%) D disk03 State: up Device /dev/da4a Avail: 3/4094 MB (0%) D disk04 State: up Device /dev/da5a Avail: 3/4094 MB (0%) D disk05 State: up Device /dev/da6a Avail: 3/4094 MB (0%) D disk08 State: up Device /dev/da7a Avail: 3/4094 MB (0%) D disk09 State: up Device /dev/da8a Avail: 3/4094 MB (0%) D disk10...

...t; > da2 at ahc0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 > > da2: <SEAGATE ST34371N 0484> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 > > device > > da2: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15), Tagged > > Queueing Enabled > > da2: 4148MB (8496884 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 4148C) > > da5 at ahc0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 > > da5: <SEAGATE ST15150N 0023> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 > > device > > da5: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15), Tagged > > Queueing Enabled > > da5: 4095MB (8388315 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 4095C) > > da4 at ahc0...

...bled da3: 139979MB (286677120 512 byte sectors: 255H 32S/T 35132C) da4 at ciss0 bus 0 scbus2 target 4 lun 0 da4: <COMPAQ RAID 0 VOLUME OK> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device da4: 135.168MB/s transfers da4: Command Queueing enabled da4: 139979MB (286677120 512 byte sectors: 255H 32S/T 35132C) da5 at ciss0 bus 0 scbus2 target 5 lun 0 da5: <COMPAQ RAID 0 VOLUME OK> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device da5: 135.168MB/s transfers da5: Command Queueing enabled da5: 139979MB (286677120 512 byte sectors: 255H 32S/T 35132C) da6 at ciss0 bus 0 scbus2 target 6 lun 0 da6: <COMPAQ RAID 0 VOLUM...

...5) %D0 = MOVE_dr_dr32 %D1<kill> RTS %D0<imp-use,kill> # End machine code for ilog2(). Here's where things to south: # Machine code for ilog2(): Live Ins: D0 in VR#1030 Live Outs: D0 entry: 01917130, LLVM BB @003F93A0, ID#0: Live Ins: %D0 MOVE_dr_mem_pd32 %Da5, %Da7 %Da5 = MOVE_dr_dr32 %Da7 %Da7 = ADD_imm_dr32 4, %Da7 %D1 = CLR_dr32 CMP_dr_dr32 %D0, %D1<kill> %D1<dead> = SEQ BEQ mbb<entry.bb9_crit_edge,01916610> Successors according to CFG: 01916610 (#4) 01916530 (#1) entry.bb5_crit_e...

...) multipath/newdisk1 OPTIMAL da6 (ACTIVE) da1 (PASSIVE) multipath/newdisk4 OPTIMAL da3 (ACTIVE) da4 (PASSIVE) multipath/newdisk OPTIMAL da0 (ACTIVE) da5 (PASSIVE) multipath/newdisk3 OPTIMAL da8 (ACTIVE) da9 (PASSIVE) * * *zpool status after pulling the active path g_multipath device*: pool: mypool1 state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverabl...

Dear List: I have the following simple program: x<- sample(site) VarGuilda1<- var(tapply(x,site,func1)) VarGuilda2<- var(tapply(x,site,func2)) VarGuilda3<- var(tapply(x,site,func3)) VarGuilda4<- var(tapply(x,site,func4)) VarGuilda5<- var(tapply(x,site,func5)) VarGuilda6<- var(tapply(x,site,func6)) VarGuilda7<- var(tapply(x,site,func7)) VarGuilda8<- var(tapply(x,site,func8)) VarGuilda9<- var(tapply(x,site,func9)) Var<-cbind(VarGuilda1,VarGuilda2,VarGuilda3,VarGuilda4,VarGuilda5,VarGuilda6,VarGuilda7,VarGuilda...

...lt;HPT DISK 0_3 4.00> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da3: 2861588MB (5860533168 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 364801C) da4 at hpt27xx0 bus 0 scbus8 target 4 lun 0 da4: <HPT DISK 0_4 4.00> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da4: 1907729MB (3907029168 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 243201C) da5 at hpt27xx0 bus 0 scbus8 target 5 lun 0 da5: <HPT DISK 0_5 4.00> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da5: 953869MB (1953525168 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 121601C) da6 at hpt27xx0 bus 0 scbus8 target 6 lun 0 da6: <HPT DISK 0_6 4.00> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da6: 1907729MB (390...

Hi all Having managed ZFS for about two years, I want to post a wishlist. INCLUDED IN ZFS - Mirror existing single-drive filesystem, as in ''zfs attach'' - RAIDz-stuff - single and hopefully multiple-parity RAID configuration with block-level checksumming - Background scrub/fsck - Pool-like management with multiple RAIDs/mirrors (VDEVs) - Autogrow as in ZFS autoexpand NOT

Hi. I''m all set for doing performance comparsion between Solaris/ZFS and FreeBSD/ZFS. I spend last few weeks on FreeBSD/ZFS optimizations and I think I''m ready. The machine is 1xQuad-core DELL PowerEdge 1950, 2GB RAM, 15 x 74GB-FC-10K accesses via 2x2Gbit FC links. Unfortunately the links to disks are the bottleneck, so I''m going to use not more than 4 disks, probably.

...FF)^m at VqZ~MyWl{O2UZ(HJVGS$SU zO^glODyi1+EKL{osS0-v6r`NQ<ia^8{PlbU&k$%Mag_8VONuA38cf*>X=o9xw+cEQ zcJI)PgI(<{!!S;NQGP#q{3yxFG*ea4yz(y2%{($R*=N7vtH?Vu)^`?7GfErB8_|y# z2Ocq25fCyY$gg|o+si$=7KVM at +9^?Eh-NuXt9Z191L}<VO|6?I^B?#em}vq^bys63 zKz{HH0DEZVM;8w?ltAN98i#UNP6AvHf%7l~GX-#XaJ<#da5d44JhYM9ySkmKxR?v? z<g7A9m;FOvxrP^tppQaFWL90@)HoQXrnc0e9ZKU>#lQ8aMFPe+SiKa)1EopIVW|dX zSORhkcDU-syM#>2v>zl-yVS0q1k>Wx6`f#8dtzhx<XaDY-7#Uv)6{UE#jBwH<s*yN zJWFRa$pa#`_~OOOkmgyUQ8W3nVkM6%=eNFDlF_t_e+Qk#3Y|#z@{Fmx{TSoec+Poq zJh`8(fX2j2 at 5n{*^M;3ss#noycuod92ihtHF$0{EIWQv<byPRq&l...