search for: crdic

"Craig Dickson" <crdic@yahoo.com> wrote on 1/30/01 12:14:37 PM: > I think Warren meant that you'll be able to right-click on an .ogg file in > the Windows Explorer shell, and select "Properties" from the pop-up menu to > edit the file's comments. This is a good idea; I wish I didn't hav...

I have a number of .ogg files encoded with b2, and some with b3. Is the psychoacoustic model in the forthcoming b4 significantly improved over these builds, such that re-encoding these files would give me either noticeably better sound, or smaller files? Also, just out of curiousity, will b4-encoded files be playable with older WinAmp plugins? Incidentally, I did some tests with b2 a while back

Craig Dickson (crdic@yahoo.com) wrote : > Jack Moffitt wrote: > > > I agree that this might be the case. But what happens with the > > violation is by the author? :) > > > > Ie, in the case of PlusV releasing a patented codec under the GPL or in > > the case of LAME or FreeType...

joel@school.net writes: > So how about this? Who is recording in >2 channels? > > Neil Young may be-- he has been in the news recently for > advocating DVD multichannel music, especially for recording > live shows and playing them on home theater systems with > surround sound, bass booster, rear speakers, etc. > > Maybe he could be a great advocate for

Connected to the stream just fine with the Winamp plugin & listened for about 20 min. A few dropouts & 1 disconnect - but I'm on a flaky DSL circuit this morning, so that's hardly unexpected. Winamp reported bitrates from 26-31 kb/s. The sound quality was very decent, given the bitrate. I noted a few artifacts in the 6-8 kHz range (cymbals & electric-guitar harmonics) on an

Hello all. Quick question ('Cause I'm famished and have to get something to eat) If I have a batch of files (wave and/or ogg) with a certain naming scheme. Would it be possible for me to write a small nifty (newbie) dos-batch program that could tag those ogg-files (or encode the waves with tags) with regards to the namin parameters. Let me clarify. I usually encode waves with the

Found this on usenet: August 13, 2001 E-Business Inventors Release Free Alternative To MP3 Music, but Cost Is High By MEI FONG Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL SOMERVILLE, Mass. -- Christopher Montgomery wants to be the Linus Torvalds of music, the creator of a piece of free software that has the sweeping impact of Mr. Torvalds's Linux operating system. He soon may begin finding

Daniel Brockman wrote: > > I guess I'm just not as smart as you are. and then: > I meant to thank you for the info. Sincerely, thanks. After reading the first reply, I was worried you might have been offended, which wasn't my intention. I'm sorry if I seemed to be putting you down. Craig _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your

The web site still says that beta 4 is "scheduled for December", which seems unlikely at this point. Is B4 likely to come out soon? Any idea on the date? Thanks, Craig _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage:

When I encode a monophonic wav file, I would expect the resulting ogg file to be at about half the bit rate specified on the command line, as stated in the "oggenc -h" help text: "The 6 modes are approximately 112, 128, 160, 192, 256, and 350 kbps (for stereo 44.1kHz input. Halve these numbers for mono input).". This doesn't seem to be happening, though. I took a 16-bit,

In case there are any Debian developers around here, I wanted to point out message <20020828154322.GA15114@chulak.naquadah.org> on the debian-devel list this morning. Another Debian developer is proposing to submit an mp3->vorbis transcoding program for inclusion in Debian. I have objected to this on the grounds that the resulting vorbis files will sound like crap, and I have also pointed