search for: couplers

...see if it is the same issue? An interesting observation - the value of the trusted.glusterfs.dht.linkto xattr is different on the one of the bricks of the replica set for some of the files(Ravi, any idea why ?) ---------T 2 root root 0 May 18 16:49 /arbiterAA01/gvAA01/brick1/vaultAA01/support-couplers/CPL-SBS01 (CPL-SBS01)/D_VOL-b002-i1873-cd.md5 root at PB-WA-AA-00-A:/# getfattr -e hex -m . -d /arbiterAA01/gvAA01/brick1/vaultAA01/support-couplers/CPL-SBS01\ \(CPL-SBS01\)/D_VOL-b002-i1873-cd.md5 getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: arbiterAA01/gvAA01/brick1/va...

I'm getting the following error: > headerinfo=readLines(met_station_file,n=8) > headerinfo [1] "Plot Title: tahoe met validation ,,,,,,," [2]Error: invalid multibyte string met_station_file's first 8 lines are as follows: Plot Title: tahoe met validation ,,,,,,, #,"Time, GMT-07:00","Temp, ?F",Coupler Attached,Host Connected,Coupler

When I bought two Polycom 501 SIP phones, I naively thought they were Power-over-Ethernet (IEEE 802.3af) because they were "powered over ethernet." Silly me. Polycom must have some odd voltage or funny way of injecting the power, because the POE switch I bought for them (Netgear F@510P) won't power them, though if I use the Polycom-supplied AC adapter and ethernet power

Package: mcgibbsit Title: Warnes and Raftery's MCGibbsit MCMC diagnostic Version: 1.0 Author: Gregory R. Warnes <gregory_r_warnes at groton.pfizer.com> Description: mcgibbsit provides an implementation of Warnes & Raftery's MCGibbsit run-length diagnostic for a set of (not-necessarily independent) MCMC sampers. It combines the estimate error-bounding approach of Raftery

Package: mcgibbsit Title: Warnes and Raftery's MCGibbsit MCMC diagnostic Version: 1.0 Author: Gregory R. Warnes <gregory_r_warnes at groton.pfizer.com> Description: mcgibbsit provides an implementation of Warnes & Raftery's MCGibbsit run-length diagnostic for a set of (not-necessarily independent) MCMC sampers. It combines the estimate error-bounding approach of Raftery

Hi Benno, --- Benno Senoner <sbenno@gardena.net> wrote: > Hi, sorry for writing you directly, It's no trouble, though you may get more or better advice posting to one of the mailing lists or on irc (#winehq). I'm cc'ing wine-users in case someone else has experience in this area, hope you don't mind. > assume I use LabView on Windows to make a standalone .exe >

What gives with the stupid stupid power system on the Polycom IP500 (I hope they changed it on the 501's). Anyway, does anyone know if you can get some type of joiner to connect two Cat5 cables together, and will this affect the call/signal quality because my Ethernet cable is longer than the dumb 11ft polycom supply (oh and their manual is the wrong about which end goes into the handset

...39;s much more basic than the others. It has only an RS232 port on the back, and I need help finding out what interface it uses. The chips inside are just voltage comparators and doesn't seem to have a proper "serial" data interface, it only has a small board containing a pair of opto couplers going to the DB9 plug. You can see pictures of the output board here (onedrive): http://1drv.ms/1A3ryEp http://1drv.ms/1A3ryEp The only pins used seems to be 2, 4 and 5. ?Is it a RUPS interface? ?What cable pinout do I need to build? Thanks!!! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML at...

...stray > signals from the neighbors controller from accidentally controlling your > devices. UPB is supposed to be 99.9% reliable with a latency of less than > 100 milliseconds. Granted that still leaves a tenth of a percent of > uncertainly. However that is without resorting to filters, couplers and > the > like. > >> Granted in an existing situation there may not be a way to run more >> wires, but I evaluated them a while back and decided to stay away. > > You may want to take another look at them. Just like Asterisk has made > great > strides since the re...

Hi, My wife and I live in a two-storey flat, and we have a small home LAN (100% CentOS 5) with a "classical" configuration: On the ground floor, there is the telephone jack with the DSL modem router (192.168.1.254). This modem has a mini-switch with two Ethernet jacks to it, and the two are used by: - the server (192.168.1.1), a "black box" running in a cupboard 24/7 -

Hi listers, I am looking for people who have used Power over Ethernet switches, primarily in conjunction with Polycom IP 501's. I've been looking at the Linksys SRW224P, since I've had good luck with the SRW224 in our office. However, Nortel, Cisco, Adtran, etc. all have an offering, all of which vary in price. I would appreciate any input people have to offer. Thanks, James

>This list is for discussions among users of Asterisk, not a getting >started hotline for beginners. Beginners learn by reading documentation >and examining the sample files included. Mmm, I (respectfully) disagree. One of the unstated objectives of mechanisms like this list is to evangelize the platform. Obviously, we all want it to do well. You can only do that by creating

Hi, A. In a nutshell: The training error, obtained as "error (ret)", from the return value of a ksvm () call for a eps-svr model is (likely) being computed wrongly. "nu-svr" and "eps-bsvr" suffer from this as well. I am attaching three files: (1) ksvm.R from the the kernlab package, un-edited, (2) ksvm_eps-svr.txt: (for easier reading) containing only eps-svr