search for: convincible

> > Having read all of these threads, I am thoroughly convinced by the positions put forward by others. > Chandler, others have decided to let the compiler continue mis-compiling the function-inlining example, others have decided to not fix the inability to hoist a loop invariant divide out of a loop. It sounds like you haven’t even thought about these things let alone

>>As a fellow "lead programmer at a" [not-so-major] >>"game comapy" I understand your predicament. But >>instead of waiting for some volunteer to do it >>for free, why don't you convince EA to put someone >>on the task? I realize that good optimizers are >>expensive, but surely EA is looking at way more

I'm trying to convince my employer to deploy an Asterisk based system, but one member of the leadership team is against it. The rest of the team is for it, but he's convinced them that we should find other organisations in the Joplin, MO area who are using Asterisk first because, "we don't want to be the first in our area." I can't fathom how that's relevant, since

Hi folks! I'm trying to convince autotools to allow me to include fish.c in a C file containing a bunch of unit tests. In order to do that I need to convince it add include path (-I../) to gcc for that particular file (test-quoting.c originally, but dash seems to make troubles as well). I came up with this (snippet from Makefile.am): bin_TESTS = testquoting testquoting_CFLAGS = -I../

I was hoping that I could delegate creation of bridge devices to libvirt for address-less bridges, in order to not have to deal with the various ways distributions handle persistent network configuration, but while this creates a libvirt network... <network> <name>provision</name> <forward mode='bridge'/> <bridge name='brprov'/>

I have a problem I am trying to resolve. I have Linux firewalls protecting the users on many networks. Everything works but Domain logons to the NT4 Domain. This is due to NETBIOS and NAT problem. So I have users that have a private address and a PDC that has a pubilc address due to the network design that can?t be changed. I have install Samba 3.x and thought I could join it to the domain

On 03/06/2016 03:21 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > I was hoping that I could delegate creation of bridge devices to > libvirt for address-less bridges, in order to not have to deal with > the various ways distributions handle persistent network > configuration, but while this creates a libvirt network... > > <network> > <name>provision</name> >

Can anyone recommend some White Papers or Success Cases that we can use to ease the mind of a customer that has not heard much about Asterisk? All they know is Avaya at this point. -- Carlos Chavez Director de Tecnolog?a Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de M?xico S.A. de C.V. Tel: +52-55-91169161 Ext 2001

Hello, Can anyone give me arguments that could convince someone to choose for Samba for file and print sharing instead of setting up a NT-server? Performance ? Stability ? Benchmarks ? Tests that someone has done? Things like: "It's free" or "You don't need a powerful machine" are irrelevant to our administrators. I'm looking for answers on questions like:

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:52, Boaz Rymland <boaz.rymland at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dotan, > > thanks for taking care of this. Attached is one such document. No problem at > all in making it public. It was pretty much so in the first place. > Here are the two bugs: Severe MS Office incompatibilities https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45769

--- On Tue, 2/3/09, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] rol/ror llvm instruction set > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Cc: kasra_n500 at yahoo.com > Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 2:52 PM > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Dale Johannesen

Hello, I convinced our new Ph student to work with R and I managed to convince the guy in charge of the computer networks to install R 2.12.0 (we haven't the admin rights). I wanted to install on his computer the same packages I use (but I have R 2.11) and especially RMySQL. Problem : there is no more RMySQL package in the list pf the packages. I've tried to install my version but it is

Hi, I am using UUIDTools to generate my Guids. It works fine on my computer (Windows Xp), but doesn''t work on my host (TextDrive) The error is: Loading production environment. >> UUID.timestamp_create.to_s /sbin/ifconfig: Permission denied NoMethodError: private method `split'' called for nil:NilClass from ./script/../config/../config/../lib/uuidtools.rb:236:in

Dear All, Is there a way to convince xcodebuild to build bitcode files for LLVM for an arbitrary Xcode project? So far, I've been able to get xcodebuild to use LLVM by installing XCode 3.1 and using CC="llvm-gcc" on the command line. I've also managed to get LLVM bitcode generates for intermediate files by using "CC="lvm-gcc -emit-llvm"; however, this gives

Hello! I'm facing completely choppy sound. The wireshark trace shows, that there are a lot of codec changes without any trigger (means no options or reinvite or any other package). Background: The call is initiated by asterisk and is received by the same asterisk conference room via Phone extension -> asterisk -> provider A -> provider B -> asterisk. Asterisk initially sends

Dear all; Would anybody be able to tell me what the idmap configuration is to have Samba do the same SID-to-user/group mapping as the SSSD defaults? I was convinced I saw it on this list or the wiki not too long ago, but I cannot seem to find it. // Best wishes; Johan

Hello! Disapointed about SPSS I have to choose another statistic program. And altough I sympathise with the idea of a non-commercial software-project like R and I like the spirit of the R community (and of course I am not keen on paying 150$ to SAS for a one-year students license), I will probably buy SAS, because people I will work with use SAS and I want a close cooperation with them. Besides I

Hi, all: Per Chris and Nadav's request, I begin to write the code about analyzing address-taken lazily. I realize the alias query could be initiated from any context (*function* pass, loop pass etc), however, the analysis for global-variable-address-taken is conducted in *module* scope. Is there any potential problem over here? (For instance, function foo() and bar() comprise module

On Oct 30, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Nadav: > > I don't think this is right approach for engineering. > The time-complexity of re-analyzing addr_taken for each single alias query depends on > 1. how many global variable > 2. how many occurrence of these global variables. > 3. how many queries the compiler have.

Nadav: I don't think this is right approach for engineering. The time-complexity of re-analyzing addr_taken for each single alias query depends on 1. how many global variable 2. how many occurrence of these global variables. 3. how many queries the compiler have. 3) depends on compiler. You never know what we will have in the following few years. 1 and 2 depends on the