search for: convince

> > Having read all of these threads, I am thoroughly convinced by the positions put forward by others. > Chandler, others have decided to let the compiler continue mis-compiling the function-inlining example, others have decided to not fix the inability to hoist a loop invariant divide out of a loop. It sounds like you haven’t even thought...

>>As a fellow "lead programmer at a" [not-so-major] >>"game comapy" I understand your predicament. But >>instead of waiting for some volunteer to do it >>for free, why don't you convince EA to put someone >>on the task? I realize that good optimizers are >>expensive, but surely EA is looking at way more >>than one programmer's salary in FhG licensing fees. I'm not waiting for any volunteers; I am planning on doing it myself. I just don't...

I'm trying to convince my employer to deploy an Asterisk based system, but one member of the leadership team is against it. The rest of the team is for it, but he's convinced them that we should find other organisations in the Joplin, MO area who are using Asterisk first because, "we don't want to be the fi...

Hi folks! I'm trying to convince autotools to allow me to include fish.c in a C file containing a bunch of unit tests. In order to do that I need to convince it add include path (-I../) to gcc for that particular file (test-quoting.c originally, but dash seems to make troubles as well). I came up with this (snippet from Makefil...

...oth of these require assigning an address to the bridge which means I have to suddenly worry about IPAM and conflicts with local networks. I look at the various interface-related commands, and there is an "iface-bridge" command but this requires a physical interface. Is there any way to convince libvirt to create the bridge device for a <forward mode='bridge'/> network? -- Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@redhat.com> | larsks @ {freenode,twitter,github} Cloud Engineering / OpenStack | http://blog.oddbit.com/

...I have install Samba 3.x and thought I could join it to the domain to allow the samba server to handle the connection for the NATed users. Is there a way to do this? I need the local users to be able to authenticate to an NT4 domain or I have to remove the firewalls. I am working on trying to convince them to migrate from the NT4 domain to samba, but it is a battle. If I can show them that Linux can work with the current network for now it could by me more time to convince them to migrate. Thanks in a advance, Jason

On 03/06/2016 03:21 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > I was hoping that I could delegate creation of bridge devices to > libvirt for address-less bridges, in order to not have to deal with > the various ways distributions handle persistent network > configuration, but while this creates a libvirt network... > > <network> > <name>provision</name> >

Can anyone recommend some White Papers or Success Cases that we can use to ease the mind of a customer that has not heard much about Asterisk? All they know is Avaya at this point. -- Carlos Chavez Director de Tecnolog?a Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de M?xico S.A. de C.V. Tel: +52-55-91169161 Ext 2001

Hello, Can anyone give me arguments that could convince someone to choose for Samba for file and print sharing instead of setting up a NT-server? Performance ? Stability ? Benchmarks ? Tests that someone has done? Things like: "It's free" or "You don't need a powerful machine" are irrelevant to our administrators. I'm l...

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:52, Boaz Rymland <boaz.rymland at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dotan, > > thanks for taking care of this. Attached is one such document. No problem at > all in making it public. It was pretty much so in the first place. > Here are the two bugs: Severe MS Office incompatibilities https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45769

...cognizing the usual ways to express > rotate with shift/ > > and/or, as below. > > > Look in the DAGCombiner.cpp file to see which patterns it > translates > into ROTL and ROTR instructions. > > -bw I guess the backends could know about the instructions. But I am not convinced why it is beneficial not to have ROR and ROL instructions within llvm. > Look in the DAGCombiner.cpp file to see which patterns it > translates > into ROTL and ROTR instructions. Right, I sure will do. -- Kasra

Hello, I convinced our new Ph student to work with R and I managed to convince the guy in charge of the computer networks to install R 2.12.0 (we haven't the admin rights). I wanted to install on his computer the same packages I use (but I have R 2.11) and especially RMySQL. Problem : there is no more RMySQL p...

Hi, I am using UUIDTools to generate my Guids. It works fine on my computer (Windows Xp), but doesn''t work on my host (TextDrive) The error is: Loading production environment. >> UUID.timestamp_create.to_s /sbin/ifconfig: Permission denied NoMethodError: private method `split'' called for nil:NilClass from ./script/../config/../config/../lib/uuidtools.rb:236:in

Dear All, Is there a way to convince xcodebuild to build bitcode files for LLVM for an arbitrary Xcode project? So far, I've been able to get xcodebuild to use LLVM by installing XCode 3.1 and using CC="llvm-gcc" on the command line. I've also managed to get LLVM bitcode generates for intermediate files by usin...

...and asterisk doesn't show any codec changes ... . Deeper investigations show, that if the conference (callee) sends the first rtp package (-> g711 - should be g722), things are going choppy, if the extension (caller) sends the first package (g722), things are running stable. Any idea to convince asterisk always to use the first codec of ok sdp or how to convince asterisk to put only one codec to ok sdp (the first). Thanks, regards, Michael

Dear all; Would anybody be able to tell me what the idmap configuration is to have Samba do the same SID-to-user/group mapping as the SSSD defaults? I was convinced I saw it on this list or the wiki not too long ago, but I cannot seem to find it. // Best wishes; Johan

...e spirit of the R community (and of course I am not keen on paying 150$ to SAS for a one-year students license), I will probably buy SAS, because people I will work with use SAS and I want a close cooperation with them. Besides I guess that SAS is still much more powerful than SAS. But: can ?t you convince me to choose R? I would appreciate that very much, because my sympathy is with the r-project. Maybe the syntax of both programs is quite similar, so I will still be able to exchange a lot of experience with my SAS-using future collegues!? Or I could even convince the newcomers to swap to R!? If yo...

...ogram has 11000 global variables"! > > This is just FUD and completely unrelated to the discussion. > >> As to "Can you provide this data"? My answer is no, and I will >> not to implement the analysis >> which perform on-the-fly analysis unless I'm convinced that saving >> addr_taken bit to llvm::GlobalVariable >> is fundamentally flawed. > > You don't have to be convinced. The burden of proof is on you - not > on us to convince you. > > Here's the deal: there are tons of "potentially useful" things that...

...The 1st post says, "a program has 11000 global variables"! This is just FUD and completely unrelated to the discussion. > As to "Can you provide this data"? My answer is no, and I will not to implement the analysis > which perform on-the-fly analysis unless I'm convinced that saving addr_taken bit to llvm::GlobalVariable > is fundamentally flawed. You don't have to be convinced. The burden of proof is on you - not on us to convince you. Here's the deal: there are tons of "potentially useful" things that could be encoded in the IR. Each t...

...se website: http://forum.xitek.com/thread-1226816-5-1-1.html The 1st post says, "a program has 11000 global variables"! As to "Can you provide this data"? My answer is no, and I will not to implement the analysis which perform on-the-fly analysis unless I'm convinced that saving addr_taken bit to llvm::GlobalVariable is fundamentally flawed. Shuxin On 10/30/13 9:20 AM, Nadav Rotem wrote: > > On Oct 29, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com > <mailto:shuxin.llvm at gmail.com>> wrote: > >> That said, I do...