search for: conformation

PR16537 demonstrates a defect in Clang/LLVM conformance with the Itanium C++ ABI. I poked around a little in the Clang, LLVM, and test-suite tests but didn't see anything that obviously looked like an attempt at an ABI conformance test set. Is there a conformance test set that I missed? If not, does anybody think they are privately testing ABI conformance? Alternatively, does anybody know

With this patch, > A <- matrix(1, 2, 2) > B <- matrix(2, 3, 2) > A %*% B Error in A %*% B : non-conformable arguments of dimension (2, 2) and (3, 2) >From 205b591d4d14b5ff667325fb233a6deb08314726 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joshua Nathaniel Pritikin <jpritikin at pobox.com> Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:03:58 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Improve non-conformable arguments error

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92136 Bug ID: 92136 Summary: WebGL Conformance conformance/textures/texture-size-limit.html -> system freeze Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

I think this is a good idea. Is there a reason why it got no interest? Slippery slope? Or maybe others were also just occupied trying to figure out how Joshua's second message had timestamp earlier than his first message? On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 12:05:36PM -0400, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: >With this patch, > >> A <- matrix(1, 2, 2) >> B <- matrix(2, 3, 2) >> A

The rules for conformability of objects required for various operators remain a mystery as do some related problems like the rules for recycling in creating arrays etc. Would someone be able to direct me to where such rules are stated? In a related vein, there are all manner of operations that are readily coded in Gauss or in MATA that fail, often mysteriously, in R. Are there some

I anticipate lacking of prior experience with dimensionality reduction problems. Some scientists concerned with drug discovery performed several steered Molecular Dynamics simulations of the alanine-dipeptide molecule dragged by a radial force from an equilibrium conformation to another different equilibrium conformation. They sampled at regular intervals 7 dihedral angles, 5 bending angles, and 4 atom pair distances all along the trajectory from the initial to the final conformation. Likewise they also calculated the work done on the molecule by the applied force. Whe...

> -----Original Message----- > From: Ralph Giles [mailto:giles@xiph.org] > Sent: 30 September 2003 12:36 > To: vorbis@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [vorbis] Why is Vorbis development slow? > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 04:15:45AM -0700, John Ripley wrote: > > > I'm now quite tempted to properly finish off my decoder and > use it instead > > of Tremor in the

Hola. Tengo un problema incómodo. En el servidor de BD, existe esta tabla: SELECT * FROM motivodebito 1;"Débito presentado extemporáneamente." 2;"Corresponde la aplicación del nomenclador GCBA vigente al momento de la prestación." 3;"No registra convenio de prestaciones vigente al momento de la prestación." 4;"Débito presentado sin documentación ni

Hello, Consider this function for generalized ridge regression: gre <- function (X,y,D){ n <- dim(X)[1] p <- dim(X)[2] intercept <- rep(1, n) X <- cbind(intercept, X) X2D <- crossprod(X,X)+ D Xy <- crossprod(X,y) bth <- qr.solve(X2D, Xy) } # suppose X is an (nxp) design matrix and y is an (nx1) response vector p <- dim(x)[2] D<- diag(rep(1.5,p)) bt

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89758 Bug ID: 89758 Summary: pow WebGL Conformance test with mesa drivers Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at

I am trying to simulate draws from a multivariate normal using mvrnorm, and am getting the following error message: Error in mu + eS$vectors %*% diag(sqrt(pmax(ev, 0)), p) %*% t(X) : non-conformable arrays I do not understand why I am getting this message, since the vector of means I am giving to the function is 13 by 1 and the variance matrix I am giving to the function is 13

I've run two conformance test binary (winetest-latest and winetest-8cbb8cc38d01) on Microsoft Windows Me 4.90.3000, both warned that Win9x was not supported, and I wouldn't be able to submit results. The lastest one said that there were about 67 tests failed (some wscript and msi error dialog appeared during the test) and it also said that there might be some problem with my

I'm trying to use "predict" with a linear mixed-effects logistic regression model fitted with nlmmPQL from the MASS library. Unfortunately, I'm getting an error "non-conformable arguments" in predict.lme, and I would like to understand why. I have used the same call to "predict" with "glm" models without problems. I assume I'm doing

# Your mailer is set to "none" (default on Windows), # hence we cannot send the bug report directly from R. # Please copy the bug report (after finishing it) to # your favorite email program and send it to # # r-bugs@biostat.ku.dk # ###################################################### I stumbled on this error while doing a classroom demonstration. The error is reproducible,

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97067 Bug ID: 97067 Summary: WebGL: conformance/glsl/misc/shaders-with-invariance.html Fail Product: Mesa Version: 11.2 Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89759 Bug ID: 89759 Summary: WebGL OGL ES GLSL conformance test with mesa drivers fails Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

Hi, I am trying to implement a simple scaled-down version of the AF traffic class type. As such I basically want to remark non-conforming AF11 packets to AF13. Here is m script that I have been using on the ingress router of my network: ---------------------------------------- Link=''dev eth1'' Rate1=''rate 800Kbit'' Rate2=''rate 2500Kbit''

On Oct 20, 2010, at 2:56 PM, roger roger wrote: > I notice that using the online demo, functions which return structures are converted to be void, and instead take an extra argument which is the a pointer to the returned structure, and the allocation is made by the caller. > Even declared, but undefined functions are converted like this, presumably this doesn't cause a problem during

Hi Xiaolong, > Note that the original parameter (of the function in concern) is of > type "struct.std::_List_const_iterator<int>", whereas the parameter > (after the compilation) is of type > "struct.std::_List_node_base"*. Evidently, llvm-g++ replaces the > original parameter with its sole field. This is understandable and the > LLVM output indicates

Hello all, I have generated a principal components regression model using the pcr() function from the PLS package (R version 2.12.0). I am getting a "non-conformable arguments" error when I try to use the predict() function on new data, but only when I try to read in the new data from a separate file. More specifically, when my data looks like this #########training data