search for: commnuiti

Dear R commnuity, Thanks a lot for your help. I want to read in tables, the problem is that the table is composed in a difficult way. In ariginal it looks like this: 669 736 842101610481029114711811166124312081128117611221026 9581024 992 685 720 829 925 995 96010241057116611501104106410711092 983 908 989 904 924 896 882 897 909 933 928 907 916 902 546 734 784 868 970 954

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Karanbir Singh > Sent: 03 April 2015 01:00 > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on > x86_64 > > On 02/04/15 21:35, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > > See my reply earlier. The

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 04/02/2015 03:55 PM, Always Learning wrote: > >> Is there a commercial motive for this 'unwelcome by most' change ? >> > > Do you have data to prove that it is unwelcome by most? It is unwelcome > by you and a few others I've seen comment; what percentage of the list's >

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > > Behalf Of Karanbir Singh > > Sent: 03 April 2015 01:00 > > To: centos at centos.org > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 > ) on

On Fri, April 3, 2015 9:31 am, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote: > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >> > Behalf Of Karanbir Singh >> > Sent: 03 April 2015 01:00 >> > To: centos at centos.org >>

On 04/02/2015 07:00 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > stretching this a bit futher : lets see if we can find 10 people who > might be considered 'community beacons', who could / would act as > commnuity comms and liason to make sure we are driving in the right > directions and communicating things in the most impactful manner. ... > thoughts ? I really think that if someone

It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in /etc/os-release On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 22:54 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > > > you guys sure get your panties in a bunch over something as silly as the > > iso file name. > > You may wear them, many of us