search for: commnuity

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "commnuity".

2009 Nov 04
4
read.table (again)
Dear R commnuity, Thanks a lot for your help. I want to read in tables, the problem is that the table is composed in a difficult way. In ariginal it looks like this: 669 736 842101610481029114711811166124312081128117611221026 9581024 992 685 720 829 925 995 96010241057116611501104106410711092 983 908 989 904 9...
2015 Apr 03
3
Community voice (was [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64)
...e for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on > x86_64 > > On 02/04/15 21:35, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > > See my reply earlier. The description of the centos-devel list says > > "this is strictly about development." > > > Matt, come join the contributor base - be a commnuity communication liason ( > or, I am sure we can find a title to quantify this ). > > stretching this a bit futher : lets see if we can find 10 people who might be > considered 'community beacons', who could / would act as commnuity comms > and liason to make sure we are drivin...
2015 Apr 02
1
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 04/02/2015 03:55 PM, Always Learning wrote: > >> Is there a commercial motive for this 'unwelcome by most' change ? >> > > Do you have data to prove that it is unwelcome by most? It is unwelcome > by you and a few others I've seen comment; what percentage of the list's >
2015 Apr 03
0
Community voice (was [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64)
...x86_64 > > > > On 02/04/15 21:35, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > > > > See my reply earlier. The description of the centos-devel list says > > > "this is strictly about development." > > > > > > Matt, come join the contributor base - be a commnuity communication > liason ( > > or, I am sure we can find a title to quantify this ). > > > I can't take on any further time sinks. But see my comments below. I question the need for such a thing. > stretching this a bit futher : lets see if we can find 10 people who > m...
2015 Apr 03
1
Community voice (was [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64)
...gt; On 02/04/15 21:35, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> > >> > > See my reply earlier. The description of the centos-devel list says >> > > "this is strictly about development." >> > >> > >> > Matt, come join the contributor base - be a commnuity communication >> liason ( >> > or, I am sure we can find a title to quantify this ). >> > >> > > I can't take on any further time sinks. But see my comments below. I > question the need for such a thing. > > >> stretching this a bit futher : le...
2015 Apr 03
0
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/02/2015 07:00 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > stretching this a bit futher : lets see if we can find 10 people who > might be considered 'community beacons', who could / would act as > commnuity comms and liason to make sure we are driving in the right > directions and communicating things in the most impactful manner. ... > thoughts ? I really think that if someone is actually interested in helping the project, rather than being a backseat driver and griping at every change fro...
2015 Apr 02
8
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in /etc/os-release On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 22:54 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > > > you guys sure get your panties in a bunch over something as silly as the > > iso file name. > > You may wear them, many of us