Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "commnuity".
2009 Nov 04
4
read.table (again)
Dear R commnuity,
Thanks a lot for your help.
I want to read in tables, the problem is that the table is composed in a
difficult way. In ariginal it looks like this:
669 736 842101610481029114711811166124312081128117611221026 9581024 992
685 720 829 925 995 96010241057116611501104106410711092 983 908 989 904
9...
2015 Apr 03
3
Community voice (was [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64)
...e for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on
> x86_64
>
> On 02/04/15 21:35, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>
> > See my reply earlier. The description of the centos-devel list says
> > "this is strictly about development."
>
>
> Matt, come join the contributor base - be a commnuity communication liason (
> or, I am sure we can find a title to quantify this ).
>
> stretching this a bit futher : lets see if we can find 10 people who might be
> considered 'community beacons', who could / would act as commnuity comms
> and liason to make sure we are drivin...
2015 Apr 02
1
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote:
> On 04/02/2015 03:55 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>> Is there a commercial motive for this 'unwelcome by most' change ?
>>
>
> Do you have data to prove that it is unwelcome by most? It is unwelcome
> by you and a few others I've seen comment; what percentage of the list's
>
2015 Apr 03
0
Community voice (was [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64)
...x86_64
> >
> > On 02/04/15 21:35, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> >
> > > See my reply earlier. The description of the centos-devel list says
> > > "this is strictly about development."
> >
> >
> > Matt, come join the contributor base - be a commnuity communication
> liason (
> > or, I am sure we can find a title to quantify this ).
> >
>
I can't take on any further time sinks. But see my comments below. I
question the need for such a thing.
> stretching this a bit futher : lets see if we can find 10 people who
> m...
2015 Apr 03
1
Community voice (was [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64)
...gt; On 02/04/15 21:35, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>> >
>> > > See my reply earlier. The description of the centos-devel list says
>> > > "this is strictly about development."
>> >
>> >
>> > Matt, come join the contributor base - be a commnuity communication
>> liason (
>> > or, I am sure we can find a title to quantify this ).
>> >
>>
>
> I can't take on any further time sinks. But see my comments below. I
> question the need for such a thing.
>
>
>> stretching this a bit futher : le...
2015 Apr 03
0
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/02/2015 07:00 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> stretching this a bit futher : lets see if we can find 10 people who
> might be considered 'community beacons', who could / would act as
> commnuity comms and liason to make sure we are driving in the right
> directions and communicating things in the most impactful manner. ...
> thoughts ?
I really think that if someone is actually interested in helping the
project, rather than being a backseat driver and griping at every change
fro...
2015 Apr 02
8
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in
/etc/os-release
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 22:54 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> > you guys sure get your panties in a bunch over something as silly as the
> > iso file name.
>
> You may wear them, many of us