search for: classics

Hi, ? have a necron snmp ups. nut-scanner cant find it. i tried to add with these definition but it fails.. [test5-ups] driver = snmp-ups port = 10.9.40.19 community = asdf12 desc ="test" i run driver with debugging , result is , root at upsviewer-debian:/usr/local/ups/bin# ./snmp-ups -DDDDDDD -a test5-upsNetwork UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.68 (2.6.5) 0.000000

Hi, I have two UPS SMART-UPS 2200 RM both of them have the same configuration.One of them works fine, but the other one it doesn't, it output as follows: snmp-ups -D -a nutdev10 Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.72 (2.7.2) 0.000000 debug level is '1' 0.001013 SNMP UPS driver : entering upsdrv_initups() 0.048606 trying the new match_sysoid() method

Am 2017-05-23 um 16:59 schrieb Rowland Penny: > As this is testing, rather than changing anything now, re-run the > classic upgrade, but this time do it on a a machine with the required > hostname and change the netbios name in smb.conf. so: rm -fr /var/lib/samba/* edit/set hostname and /etc/hosts, maybe reboot classic-upgrade ... ?

I have been working with NUT to get this working since upgrading to a web snmp card in a UPS. I keep getting seg faults when running snmp-ups also. Below is the output. kernel: [1365065.178230] snmp-ups[1940]: segfault at 0 ip b7555470 sp bf8d89e8 error 4 in libc-2.18.so[b74c2000+1a9000] Running: Arch i686 current Nut is current git Device is Tripp Lite SU2200XLa with WEBSNMPCARD running

Hi, ? have a necron snmp ups. nut-scanner cant find it. i tried to add with these definition but it fails.. [test5-ups] driver = snmp-ups port = 10.9.40.19 community = asdf12 desc ="test" i run driver with debugging , result is , root at upsviewer-debian:/usr/local/ups/bin# ./snmp-ups -DDDDDDD -a test5-upsNetwork UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.68 (2.6.5) 0.000000

Good Day All I need a very quick clarification about this: Attention! Please verify that your Samba AD DC was not set up using the classic upgrade method. If the classic-upgrade was used, we highly recommend to NOT upgrade to the new 4.2 release. The?bug report contains detailed information on this issue. now my question is, is it safe to upgrade directly from Samba 3 to samba 4.2.1 using the

Thanks for the quick response Charles! I may not have gotten the correct output from the snmpwalk, let me know if the attachment is usable. Thanks! New data added, here is the gdb output: Reading symbols from /usr/bin/snmp-ups...(no debugging symbols found)...done. (gdb) run -a tripplite -DD Starting program: /usr/bin/snmp-ups -a tripplite -DD warning: Could not load shared library symbols for

Dear samba experts, I did a classic upgrade from a Samba 3.6.14 samba NT4 DC to a Samba 4.18.2 AD-DC. It does not work and I just want to make sure that I have the correct understanding of our domain SID. On our old Samba server net getdomainsid shows: SID for local machine SERV00 is: S-1-5-21-1415314133-2460755331-2761616138 SID for domain NAV is: S-1-5-21-1415314133-2460755331-2761616138

Here is the upsc output: # /usr/local/ups/bin/snmp-ups -DD -a irs2-ups1 Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.68 (2.6.5) 0.000000 debug level is '2' 0.000327 SNMP UPS driver : entering upsdrv_initups() 0.000341 SNMP UPS driver : entering nut_snmp_init(snmp-ups) 0.056112 SNMP UPS driver : entering load_mib2nut(auto) 0.056126 trying the new

Hello, i'm trying to monitor a APC Smart-UPS 1000 behind a APC AP9630 Network Management Card via SNMPv3 using the AES Privacy Protocol. * OS name and version: Debian 10.1 * exact NUT version: 2.7.4 * NUT installation method: from debian package 2.7.4-8 * exact device name and related information * Model Number AP9630 * Hardware Revision 08 * Manufacture Date

Hi, I'm trying connect a device: * OS name and version: root at nut:/etc/nut# hostnamectl Static hostname: nut Icon name: computer-vm Chassis: vm Machine ID: d7a3b7fc724f4fe1a79a3d0eeff08f72 Boot ID: 40a561c464064b5184150f5909af0aa7 Virtualization: vmware Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-9-amd64 Architecture: x86-64 * NUT version

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: winbindd.zip Type: application/x-zip-compressed Size: 52252 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20021202/ee1c44bf/winbindd.bin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smbd.zip Type:

On 2/24/2014 11:10 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Feb 24, 2014, at 10:29 PM, Jason R Begley wrote: > >> Thanks for the quick response Charles! I may not have gotten the correct output from the snmpwalk, let me know if the attachment is usable. Thanks! > Sorry, it's basically all comments. Do you have the stdout from the subdriver script? Also, how is the MIB file installed?

I don't think the classic BIOS systems read the partition table at all. Rather, they just load the first 440 bytes from the drive into memory and copy the memory address that it was loaded to a CPU register. From there, it is up to that 440 byte program to decipher the partition table. If you use syslinux's gptmbr.bin, you should be fine. On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 4:47 AM Erik Rull

On Feb 24, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Jason R Begley wrote: > Segmentation fault That's not good. If you crank up the debug level past 2, does it provide any more detail about where it crashed? (We'd only need the last few lines, if they are different.) I don't know how Arch Linux does debug symbols, so the dmesg output doesn't pinpoint which function in libc got bad data. Can you run

I am testing an upgraded NT4-domain: debian VM, samba 4 ... classic upgrade through I assigned the IP of the future server already, and I want to adjust the DNS-entries. Current NT4-DC is called "server.my.tld", so I got all the kerberos related DNS-entries with "server" Future ADS-DC should be called "dc.my.tld" : is there an easier way to do that then going

Tomorrow, Friday March 15 Maybe you missed Part 1 of "The Evolution of Regression Modeling from Classical Linear Regression to Modern Ensembles " webinar series, but you can still join for Parts 2, 3, & 4 > Register Now for Parts 2, 3, 4: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/500959705 > > Course Outline: Overcoming Linear Regression Limitations > > Regression is

Maybe you missed Part 1 of "The Evolution of Regression Modeling from Classical Linear Regression to Modern Ensembles " webinar series, but you can still join for Parts 2, 3, & 4 Register Now for Parts 2, 3, 4: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/500959705 Download (optional) a free evaluation of the SPM software suite v7.0 (used in the hands-on components of the webinar). As a

Hi all, I was conducting a meta-analysis of single proportions(i.e. without a control group) using the metafor package. When I performed a classic fail-safe N, I noticed that the result (the number of missing studies that would bring p-value to the alpha, to be exact)was different than that I got in Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2.0. I wonder why R and CMA got different results. *Below is

I would suggest to post this to the (recently created) R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list. See: https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis Best, Wolfgang >-----Original Message----- >From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Naike Wang >Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 08:32 >To: R-help at r-project.org >Subject: [R] Classic fail-safe N >