search for: classic

...driver : entering nut_snmp_init(snmp-ups) 0.001679 SNMP UPS driver : entering load_mib2nut(auto) 0.001691 trying the new match_sysoid() method 0.001696 Entering nut_snmp_get_str() 0.001706 nut_snmp_get(.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0) 6.008128 Can't get sysOID value 6.008150 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'apcc' mib 6.008157 Entering nut_snmp_get_str() 6.008169 nut_snmp_get(.1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.1.1.1.0) 12.014585 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'mge' mib 12.014609 Entering nut_snmp_get_str() 12.014617 nut_snmp_get(.1.3.6.1.4.1.705.1.1.1.0) 18.021015 loa...

..., it output as follows: snmp-ups -D -a nutdev10 Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.72 (2.7.2) 0.000000 debug level is '1' 0.001013 SNMP UPS driver : entering upsdrv_initups() 0.048606 trying the new match_sysoid() method 6.070451 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'apcc' mib 12.077390 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'mge' mib 18.084471 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'netvision' mib 24.091517 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'pw' mib 30.097972 load_mib2nut: trying c...

Am 2017-05-23 um 16:59 schrieb Rowland Penny: > As this is testing, rather than changing anything now, re-run the > classic upgrade, but this time do it on a a machine with the required > hostname and change the netbios name in smb.conf. so: rm -fr /var/lib/samba/* edit/set hostname and /etc/hosts, maybe reboot classic-upgrade ... ?

...match_sysoid: checking MIB ietf 0.027872 match_sysoid: comparing .1.3.6.1.4.1.850.1 with .1.3.6.1.2.1.33 0.027878 No matching MIB found for sysOID '.1.3.6.1.4.1.850.1'! Please report it to NUT developers, with an 'upsc' output for your device. Going back to the classic MIB detection method. 0.027886 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'apcc' mib 0.031624 [tripplite] unhandled ASN 0x80 received from .1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.1.1.1.0 0.031665 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'mge' mib 0.034569 [tripplite] u...

...driver : entering nut_snmp_init(snmp-ups) 0.001679 SNMP UPS driver : entering load_mib2nut(auto) 0.001691 trying the new match_sysoid() method 0.001696 Entering nut_snmp_get_str() 0.001706 nut_snmp_get(.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0) 6.008128 Can't get sysOID value 6.008150 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'apcc' mib 6.008157 Entering nut_snmp_get_str() 6.008169 nut_snmp_get(.1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.1.1.1.0) 12.014585 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'mge' mib 12.014609 Entering nut_snmp_get_str() 12.014617 nut_snmp_get(.1.3.6.1.4.1.705.1.1.1.0) 18.021015 loa...

Good Day All I need a very quick clarification about this: Attention! Please verify that your Samba AD DC was not set up using the classic upgrade method. If the classic-upgrade was used, we highly recommend to NOT upgrade to the new 4.2 release. The?bug report contains detailed information on this issue. now my question is, is it safe to upgrade directly from Samba 3 to samba 4.2.1 using the classic upgrade? thanks

...match_sysoid: checking MIB ietf 0.029095 match_sysoid: comparing .1.3.6.1.4.1.850.1 with .1.3.6.1.2.1.33 0.029115 No matching MIB found for sysOID '.1.3.6.1.4.1.850.1'! Please report it to NUT developers, with an 'upsc' output for your device. Going back to the classic MIB detection method. 0.029148 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'apcc' mib 0.032571 [tripplite] unhandled ASN 0x80 received from .1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.1.1.1.0 0.032599 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'mge' mib 0.035518 [tripplite] u...

Dear samba experts, I did a classic upgrade from a Samba 3.6.14 samba NT4 DC to a Samba 4.18.2 AD-DC. It does not work and I just want to make sure that I have the correct understanding of our domain SID. On our old Samba server net getdomainsid shows: SID for local machine SERV00 is: S-1-5-21-1415314133-2460755331-2761616138 SID...

....119591 match_sysoid: checking MIB ietf 1.119598 match_sysoid: comparing .1.3.6.1.4.1.318 with .1.3.6.1.2.1.33 1.119605 No matching MIB found for sysOID '.1.3.6.1.4.1.318'! Please report it to NUT developers, with an 'upsc' output for your device. Going back to the classic MIB detection method. 1.119612 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'apcc' mib 1.326472 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'mge' mib 1.536183 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'netvision' mib 1.748518 load_mib2nut: trying classic...

...) 0.053717 trying the new match_sysoid() method 0.053732 Entering nut_snmp_get_oid() 0.053755 nut_snmp_get(.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0) 0.053769 nut_snmp_walk(.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0) 0.053783 nut_snmp_walk: max. iteration = 1 0.059538 Can't get sysOID value 0.059573 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'apcc' mib 0.059588 su_find_info: "ups.model" found 0.059602 Testing ups.model using OID .1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.1.1.1.0 0.059616 Entering nut_snmp_get_str() 0.059630 nut_snmp_get(.1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.1.1.1.0) 0.059643 nut_snmp_walk(.1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1...

...tch_sysoid: checking MIB ietf 0.018884 match_sysoid: comparing .1.3.6.1.4.1.476.1.42 with .1.3.6.1.2.1.33 0.018888 No matching MIB found for sysOID '.1.3.6.1.4.1.476.1.42'! Please report it to NUT developers, with an 'upsc' output for your device. Going back to the classic MIB detection method. 0.018895 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'apcc' mib 0.018903 Testing ups.model using OID .1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.1.1.1.0 0.022142 [WL_UPS_L4-06] unhandled ASN 0x80 received from .1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.1.1.1.0 0.022160 load_mib2nu...

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: winbindd.zip Type: application/x-zip-compressed Size: 52252 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20021202/ee1c44bf/winbindd.bin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smbd.zip Type:

...match_sysoid: checking MIB ietf 0.029430 match_sysoid: comparing .1.3.6.1.4.1.850.1 with .1.3.6.1.2.1.33 0.029450 No matching MIB found for sysOID '.1.3.6.1.4.1.850.1'! Please report it to NUT developers, with an 'upsc' output for your device. Going back to the classic MIB detection method. 0.029484 load_mib2nut: trying classic method with 'apcc' mib 0.029504 Entering nut_snmp_get_str() 0.029523 nut_snmp_get(.1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.1.1.1.0) 0.029542 nut_snmp_walk(.1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.1.1.1.1.0) 0.033051 [tripplite] u...

I don't think the classic BIOS systems read the partition table at all. Rather, they just load the first 440 bytes from the drive into memory and copy the memory address that it was loaded to a CPU register. From there, it is up to that 440 byte program to decipher the partition table. If you use syslinux's gptmbr.bin,...

On Feb 24, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Jason R Begley wrote: > Segmentation fault That's not good. If you crank up the debug level past 2, does it provide any more detail about where it crashed? (We'd only need the last few lines, if they are different.) I don't know how Arch Linux does debug symbols, so the dmesg output doesn't pinpoint which function in libc got bad data. Can you run

I am testing an upgraded NT4-domain: debian VM, samba 4 ... classic upgrade through I assigned the IP of the future server already, and I want to adjust the DNS-entries. Current NT4-DC is called "server.my.tld", so I got all the kerberos related DNS-entries with "server" Future ADS-DC should be called "dc.my.tld" : is there an easie...

Tomorrow, Friday March 15 Maybe you missed Part 1 of "The Evolution of Regression Modeling from Classical Linear Regression to Modern Ensembles " webinar series, but you can still join for Parts 2, 3, & 4 > Register Now for Parts 2, 3, 4: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/500959705 > > Course Outline: Overcoming Linear Regression Limitations > > Regression is one of the...

Maybe you missed Part 1 of "The Evolution of Regression Modeling from Classical Linear Regression to Modern Ensembles " webinar series, but you can still join for Parts 2, 3, & 4 Register Now for Parts 2, 3, 4: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/500959705 Download (optional) a free evaluation of the SPM software suite v7.0 (used in the hands-on components of the...

Hi all, I was conducting a meta-analysis of single proportions(i.e. without a control group) using the metafor package. When I performed a classic fail-safe N, I noticed that the result (the number of missing studies that would bring p-value to the alpha, to be exact)was different than that I got in Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2.0. I wonder why R and CMA got different results. *Below is the R code:* dat=read.table("Your working...

...ysis mailing list. See: https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis Best, Wolfgang >-----Original Message----- >From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Naike Wang >Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 08:32 >To: R-help at r-project.org >Subject: [R] Classic fail-safe N > >Hi all, >I was conducting a meta-analysis of single proportions(i.e. without a >control group) using the metafor package. When I performed a classic >fail-safe N, I noticed that the result (the number of missing studies that >would bring p-value to the alpha, to be...