search for: chrisd

....0.0.1, 10.10.10. oplocks = No follow symlinks = No printing = cups printcap name = cups load printers = yes ===================<snip>=============================== [Members] path = "/home/Members" valid users = +member_serv, chrisd, kurtk, administrator, jeffh admin users = chrisd, kurtk, administrator, jeffh read list = +member_serv, chrisd, kurtk, administrator, jeffh write list = +member_serv, chrisd, kurtk, administrator, jeffh force user = %U force group = member_serv read...

...n, I can post that too, I just didn't want to waste people's time. Can samba support a directory mask of 2770? If so, what am I doing wrong? Thanks! Chris A snippet of smb.conf: [share] path=/share browseable =no force user = %U create mask = 0770 directory mask = 2770 admin users = chrisd,kurtk,administrator,zena valid users = chrisd,kurtk,administrator,zena,+homeshare

...o printing = cups printcap name = cups load printers = yes idmap uid = 10000-20000 winbind enum users = yes winbind gid = 10000-20000 winbind enum groups = yes winbind separator = + os level = 20 [images] valid users = chrisd,kristynp,administrator public = no path = /images writable = yes write list = kristynp,chrisd,administrator admin users = kristynp,chrisd,administrator force user = root my krb5.conf: Code: [libdefaults] default_realm = NEWDOMAIN.INT [realms]...

...ath = %H/sam valid users = +%U, %U write list = +%U force user = %U force group = %U read only = No create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 browseable = No [DOMAINNAME_tmp] path = /DOMAINNAME_tmp admin users = chrisd, kurtk, administrator force user = %U force group = %G read only = No create mask = 0666 directory mask = 0777 guest ok = Yes

I''ve been searching the web, wikis, and more, and I haven''t turned up examples of how to have multiple entities in a single-table inheritance related to anything. I have an addresses table, but multiple entities can have Addresses: both Person (which has 2 addresses) and Retailer. I''ve been told that I need to use single-table inheritance, and this was my attempt:

Quick question about Samba and Domain Local groups. Ive got a Samba 3.0.7 server (redhat 8) as a domain member of a 2K Domain in native mode. (security = domain). Std Windows group mgmt says: Users are members of Global Groups. Global Groups are members of local groups Local Groups control access to resources. So ive got a Domain Local group I want to use to restrict access to a samba share:

Hello. I have set up a new samba server here at work, and for most things it is working great -- but there is yet one major issue. It works fine for Windows and Dave clients, but the problem arises when I use smbmount. It is set up as a domain member of an ADS domain. For example, I have a public share that everyone in the office should be able to access, regardless of platform or even

find_by_sql BREAKS THE OOP BEAUTY and perhaps we can solve that. NAMING CONVENTIONS can perhaps make find_by_sql much more clever. lets imagine that relation: publishers <- books <-> authors_books <-> authors -> universities (can''t find something else than university for that last association :) ) imagine we want to fetch every book and every associated

I think what fredrico says is good advice. I have one more suggestion. Make the users primary group the same, if possible. So if you have user: Bob #groups bob (output is:) bob : bob accounting This is not ideal, because any file made by him will have the group bob. if you do this # usermod -g accounting bob # groups bob bob : accounting Bob doesn't really need to be a member of group

Hello. I have a samba server setup with 3.0.2a-r1. It was working just fine, then suddenly, I cannot connect to any of my shares on my server with smbmount. Everytime I try to connect, I get this error: session setup failed: ERRDOS - 2215 I do something like this: smbmount //myserver/share /mnt/misc -o username=myself,workgroup=myworkgroup The password prompt comes up, I put it in, it hangs

Hello again... Still struggling with this. I don't understand it, because this stuff used to work on my old samba server, and what I am trying to do looks similar to the example in the book... I am using samba 3.0.4 in as an ADS domain member. (I used to use 2.0.7 in an NT4 domain). I am trying to use directives like: force user = %u valid users = %u force group = %g But they are

Hello everyone, My samba has been running so flawlessly, I don't think I have posted here in about 2 years! But, the time has come to move our windows domain from NT 4 to windows 2000. Currently, we run samba 2.0.7 on an old RH 6.2 box which hands off all authentication to the NT4 pdc (we have no bdc currently). I would like to keep this same style of authentication -- where the samba

Does anyone have a good solution to stream hold music to the Asterisk/FreePBX server? I currently have setup WinAMP using ShoutCast but it appears to a very touch and go stream, being that it seems to periodically drop the connection. Asterisk 1.6, FreePBX 2.8, WinAMP v5.6 Chris Davis Enterprise Administrator Barkley Court Reporters | Barkley Trial Technologies Global Deposition Services (310)

Hello. I am running samba 3.0.5 in an ADS environment. I have a win2k3 server as the DC and my samba machine (running on Gentoo Linux) is a member of that domain. I am using winbind. I have three users, for this example I will call them Larry, Curly and Moe. All three have RW access to a share on the server called "stooges". The linux perms on this directory look like this:

Hello. I have samba working with ADS and winbind (upgrading from nt4/samba-2.0.7 to w2k3/samba-3.0.4). Everything seems cool, but for one thing. My old homes share used to look like this: [homes] path=%H/sam valid users = +%G,%U force user = %U force group = %G write list = +%U create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 browseable=no read only = no It worked beautifully. But the whold valid

Hi -- I was very keen to download rsync and give it a whirl with the new --link-dest feature. However, I was terribly puzzled when I couldn't seem to get it working, even though --compare-dest with the same argument would work. It seemed like new files would be transferred even though files existed in the compare-dest/link-dest location; compare-dest would detect them but link-dest would

Hello. I have been having some major troubles lately with samba and winbind. The last 5 posts I made, no one has responded. I did some looking around, and in the last several months it seems that very few people are getting any assistance at all on this list at all. Why is that? I haven't needed this list in years, but it used to be very different. Is there another place a person can