search for: captial

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "captial".

Did you mean: capital
2008 Mar 20
6
Parsing multiple RSS & Atom feed formats
I''m working on a RSS aggregator, and I''ve based the parser on a script from this post; http://www.superwick.com/archives/2007/06/09/rss-feed-parsing-in-ruby-on-rails/ But, being the complete newbie, I''ve found that this parser only works for specifically formatted feeds. For example, some feeds will throw a ''nil text'' error. I know that I could make
2009 Dec 04
0
[LLVMdev] "SrcValue is not a pointer?" assertion in SelectionDAG::getSrcValue
Hello Ether, I think it is referring to the Value class (captial V) whose documentation is found at http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Value.html . It has to be a pointer because the Value class is a parent class to many many child classes. --Sam ----- Original Message ---- > From: ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> > To: LLVM Developers Mail...
2010 Dec 04
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] draft rule for naming types/functions/variables
...nstr *MI looks much better than MachineInstr *mi, etc. > Hum? I don't think MI is better. I haven't see this style until clang/llvm. Many others open source projects just uses the normal lower case variable, which is MUCH better IMO. For me is confusing to have a variable starting with captial letter, because it's hard to differentiate it from class names.
2009 Dec 04
2
[LLVMdev] "SrcValue is not a pointer?" assertion in SelectionDAG::getSrcValue
hi, i am building selectionDAG by my own code, but got a assertion fail said "SrcValue is not a pointer?". but since the comment above the SrcValueSDNode said: "SrcValueSDNode - An SDNode that holds an arbitrary LLVM IR Value." why the llvm value of SrcValueSDNode must be with PointerType? is that assertion necessary? thanks a lots. regards --ether
2006 May 11
4
Legacy database problem
Hi I am trying to use Ruby on Rails to work with an existing database. The problem is that, all the table names begin with a captial letter (e.g. Products). So I did the following changes in environment.rb, I''ve added under # Include your application configuration below ActiveRecord::Base.pluralize_table_names = false In class Product, I''ve added set_table_name "Products" however, if I try to li...
2010 Oct 27
3
Module names - limitations / reserved words?
...et land. My question today is, Are there "reserved" words that can''t be used as module to resource names? If yes, does anyone have the list or a URL to the list? We''ve looked but all we found are references to class name limitations, "ie can''t begin with a CAPTIAL letter". Thanks in advance, Wade -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegr...
2010 Jun 07
1
resolve KDC network address error
Hello Samba-List-Users I have a problem with KDC network name resolution. I tried to google it and sought help on IRC#samba, to no avail. So I'll post my problem here. In the spirit of privacy and normalization all server names in this post are replaced. CAPTIAL server names are actually capitalized in the configuration files. Setup: 1x Debian5 x64 server running samba 3.2.5 2x Windows Server 2008R2 domain controllers (Active Directory running in native mode) some Windows7 Clients here are my configuration files: smb.conf (global section) ------------...
2010 Dec 04
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] draft rule for naming types/functions/variables
...hineInstr *mi, etc. >> > > Hum? I don't think MI is better. I haven't see this style until > clang/llvm. Many others open source projects just uses the normal > lower case variable, which is MUCH better IMO. > > For me is confusing to have a variable starting with captial letter, > because it's hard to differentiate it from class names. Thiago, The coding standards (which have been finalized and comitted) don't dictate names for local variables. -Chris
2009 Jul 07
2
Wrong credential caching
A user logged in with a captial "L" for his username: Jul 7 12:30:31 postamt dovecot: auth(default): cache(Loser,10.47.64.227): miss Jul 7 12:30:31 postamt dovecot: auth(default): shadow(Loser,10.47.64.227): lookup Jul 7 12:30:31 postamt dovecot: auth(default): shadow(Loser,10.47.64.227): unknown user Jul 7 12:30:3...
2010 Nov 29
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] draft rule for naming types/functions/variables
> I enjoyed the new coding style in recent patches. Camel case makes it easy > to pick a descriptive name. Starting functions and variables with lower > cases reduces chances to conflict with a type name. Honestly speaking, I don't. Especially in the cases when varname is made from an acronym. E.g. MachineInstr *MI looks much better than MachineInstr *mi, etc. See latest Rafael's
2002 Nov 20
2
Defining/Checking constants in packages
In a package I am writing I need to use the constant pi (3.14..., that is) which is already defined in R. However, how can I make sure the user has not changed its value before loading the package? If this happened, is a reference to `pi' in the package going to use the user-defined value or the value defined in base? I thought I could solve the issue by including the following line in my
2012 Jul 02
2
degree of freedom GLM
Hi, I have a problem with the df. I read in a big csv file. Tabelle <- read.csv("C:\\Users\\Public\\Documents\\Bachelorarbeit\\eingabe8_durchnummeriert.csv" , header = T , sep=";") then I try this: > ygamma <- glm(Tabelle$sb_ek_ber ~1+ Tabelle$FAHRL_C + Tabelle$NUTZKREIS + Tabelle$schw_drittel_c   , family = Gamma) >  anova(ygamma, test="Chisq")
2010 Nov 29
8
[LLVMdev] draft rule for naming types/functions/variables
Hi, I enjoyed the new coding style in recent patches. Camel case makes it easy to pick a descriptive name. Starting functions and variables with lower cases reduces chances to conflict with a type name. 2010/11/23 Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) <wan at google.com> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) <wan at google.com> > wrote: > > +llvmdev > > >
2004 Sep 10
8
Organization wide
After our department went to using *, I've had several inquiries about doing VoIP for my entire organization (Small county). We have ~10 locations with various links in between (Mostly p2p T1s, some Frame (1.544mbps commit), some ISDN, some VPN over 768kbit internet) Right now we're using several NEC Electra Elite systems, and 2 Nortel Meridian systems. In one of the main locations we have