search for: c1t2d0

...ction SunFireV240 that had a zfs mirror until this week. One of the drives (c1t3d0) in the mirror failed. The system was shutdown and the bad disk replaced without an export. I don''t know what happened next but by the time I got involved there was no evidence that the remaining good disk (c1t2d0) had ever been part of a ZFS mirror. Using dd on the raw device I can see data on slice 6 of the good disk but can''t import it. Is there any way to recover from this or are they SOL? Thanks in advance # zpool status no pools available # zpool import # ls /etc/zfs # ls /dev/dsk c0t0d0s0...

Hi, Is it possible to convert a zfs pool from a concatenation of 2 disks to a 2 way mirror without backing up the data, re-creating the pool and restoring it. i.e diskA,diskB ----> mirror(diskA,diskB) Thanks, Jeff

New server build with Solaris-10 u5/08, on a SunFire t5220, and this is our first rollout of ZFS and Zpools. Have 8 disks, boot disk is hardware mirrored (c1t0d0 + c1t1d0) Created Zpool my_pool as RaidZ using 5 disks + 1 spare: c1t2d0, c1t3d0, c1t4d0, c1t5d0, c1t6d0, and spare c1t7d0 I am working on alerting & recovery plans for disks failures in the zpool. As a test, I have pulled disk c1t6d0, to see what a disk failure will look like. "zpool status -v mypool" Still reports disk c1t6d0 as ONLINE. "iostat -En...

...2x 320 GB hard drives available, and I want to set up a RAIDZ for the 750 GB and mirror for the 320 GB and add it all to the same pool. I tested detaching a drive and it seems to seriously mess up the entire pool and I can''t figure out a way to recover. # zpool create mypool raidz c1t1d0 c1t2d0 c1t3d0 # zpool add -f mypool mirror c1t4d0 c1t5d0 # zpool status pool: mypool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0...

...ng devices and try again. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-3C config: data1 UNAVAIL insufficient replicas raidz1 UNAVAIL insufficient replicas c0t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c0t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c1t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c1t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c4t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c4t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c5t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c6t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c6t3d0 FAULTED corr...

...0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0...

...c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE...

...without backing up the data and restoring? We have this: bash-3.00# zpool status pool: archives state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM archives ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... and what I would like to be able to do is to: - remove c1t3d0 from the raidz, leaving it in degraded mode momentarily. - Create a new pool with the single disk c1t3d0 - copy the data from the current pool to the new po...

...++,+++,+++++,+++ zpool create internal c0t0d0 zpool add internal c0t1d0 zpool add internal c0t2d0 zpool add internal c0t3d0 zpool add internal c0t4d0 zpool add internal c0t5d0 zpool add internal c0t6d0 zpool add internal c0t7d0 zpool add internal c1t0d0 zpool add internal c1t1d0 zpool add internal c1t2d0 zpool add internal c1t3d0 zpool add internal c1t4d0 zpool add internal c1t5d0 zpool add internal c1t6d0 zpool add internal c1t7d0 ./bonnie++ -d /internal/ -s 8g -u0 -f Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite-...

Hi there, i''m building a small NAS with 5x1TB Disks. The disks contains at the moment some data, ntfs as the fs and aren''t a raid. Now my im wondering if its possible to add the parity later. So that i add step by step one disk to the pool. And when i add the last disk, i enable the parity. (i have only one another 1 tb disk to backup the files) Thank you for you replies and

...c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0...

...3? ? > 0.0???78.1???0 1246 c1 > >? ???0.0? ? 0.8? > ? 0.0? ? 0.0? 0.0? 0.0? ? > 0.0???16.0???0???1 > c1t0d0 > >???401.7? ? 0.0? ? > 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 31.5? ? > 0.0???78.5???1 100 c1t1d0 > >???421.2? ? 0.0? ? > 2.0? ? 0.0? 0.0 30.4? ? > 0.0???72.3???1? 98 > c1t2d0 > >???403.9? ? 0.0? ? > 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 32.0? ? > 0.0???79.2???1 100 c1t3d0 > >???406.7? ? 0.0? ? > 2.0? ? 0.0? 0.0 33.0? ? > 0.0???81.3???1 100 c1t4d0 > >???414.2? ? 0.0? ? > 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 28.6? ? > 0.0???69.1???1? 98 > c1t5d0 > >???406.3? ? 0.0? ? &g...

....0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c0t0d0 4898.3 34.2 23.2 1.4 0.1 385.3 0.0 78.1 0 1246 c1 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0 0 1 c1t0d0 401.7 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 31.5 0.0 78.5 1 100 c1t1d0 421.2 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 30.4 0.0 72.3 1 98 c1t2d0 403.9 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 32.0 0.0 79.2 1 100 c1t3d0 406.7 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 33.0 0.0 81.3 1 100 c1t4d0 414.2 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 69.1 1 98 c1t5d0 406.3 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 79.0 1 100 c1t6d0 404.3 0.0 1.9 0....

...v wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0 0 c2t0d0 2.2 79.8 128.7 216.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.4 1 6 c1t0d0 2.0 76.8 118.1 208.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.2 1 4 c1t1d0 1.7 79.0 106.7 216.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.1 1 5 c1t2d0 2.2 78.2 128.7 209.9 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.1 1 4 c1t3d0 1.8 81.2 107.4 217.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.1 1 5 c1t4d0 1.8 78.2 107.4 209.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.1 1 5 c1t5d0 0.5 53.7 32.0 106.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.6 0 3 c1t8d0 0.5 51.8 32.0...

...ilver to complete. scrub: resilver in progress for 0h56m, 23.78% done, 3h1m to go config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM data DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 spare DE...

...d# to MPxIO. % zpool status pool: data state: ONLINE status: ONLINE scrub: scrub completed with 0 errors on Sun Jul 15 10:58:33 2007 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM data ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t8d0 ONLINE 0...

1. I have a 4x18GB drive setup as RAIDZ. Now when thinking about it in terms of RAID5 I would expect to get (4-1)x18 worth of drive space, but DF -h shows 4x18. Is this a bug or do I not understand? 2. Once again thinking in RAID5 terms if I have 4X18GB and 12X9GB drives and I want to make a RAIDZ of all of them I would expect the 18GB to be treated at 9GB so the RAIDZ would be 16X9GB. Is

...c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ON...

...;zpool online''. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-D3 scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz DEGRADED 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0...

...t; c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE...