search for: c0t2d0

(for some reason I cannot find my original thread..so I''m reposting it) I am trying to move my data off of a 40gb 3.5" drive to a 40gb 2.5" drive. This is in a Netra running Solaris 10. Originally what I did was: zpool attach -f rpool c0t0d0 c0t2d0. Then I did an installboot on c0t2d0s0. Didnt work. I was not able to boot from my second drive (c0t2d0). I cannot remember my other commands but I ended up removing c0t2d0 from my pool. So here is how it looks now: # zpool status -v pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config:...

...n one of the replicas: # raidctl RAID Volume RAID RAID Disk Volume Type Status Disk Status ------------------------------------------------------ c0t0d0 IM OK c0t0d0 OK c0t1d0 OK c0t2d0 IM OK c0t2d0 OK c0t3d0 OK # zpool status -x pool: dpool state: FAULTED status: One or more devices could not be opened. There are insufficient replicas for the pool to continue functioning. action: Attach the miss...

...ore devices are missing from the system. action: The pool cannot be imported. Attach the missing devices and try again. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-3C config: data1 UNAVAIL insufficient replicas raidz1 UNAVAIL insufficient replicas c0t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c0t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c1t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c1t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c4t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c4t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c5t3d0 FAULTED corr...

I have seen conflicting examples on how to create zpools using full disks. The zpool(1M) page uses "c0t0d0" but OpenSolaris Bible and others show "c0t0d0p0". E.g.: zpool create tank raidz c0t0d0 c0t1d0 c0t2d0 c0t3d0 c0t4d0 c0t5d0 zpool create tank raidz c0t0d0p0 c0t1d0p0 c0t2d0p0 c0t3d0p0 c0t4d0p0 c0t5d0p0 I have not been able to find any discussion on whether (or when) to add the "p0" to the disk name while creating whole disk zpools. In my case, I will have 9 disks in Raid-Z3 (home file s...

...xPool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM maxPool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0...

...ed this when running iostat: r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 0.0 0.5 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0 0 c0t0d0 0.0 0.5 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0 0 c0t1d0 0.0 65.1 0.0 119640001.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 2 c0t2d0 0.0 65.1 0.0 119640090.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 2 c0t3d0 c0t2d0 and c0t3d0 are members of a ZFS pool, all other filesystems are UFS. the numbers for all non-ZFS disks are sane, and zpool iostat reports sane numbers. this only seems to happen when running a 32bit kernel. is anyone...

...r driver of rpool. Infact, solaris2 partition can be more then one in each Hard Disk, so we also can use the RAW driver like : c0t0d0p1 (/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0p1) ,c0t0d0p2 (/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0p2) as the member driver to create a new zpool : Morpho at egoodbrac1:~# zpool create dpool raidz c0t0d0p1,c0t1d0,c0t2d0 This command can successful create a new raidz pool named dpool and c0t0d0p1 means the RAW drive of the first solaris2 partition of the system disk (c0t0d0),c0t1d0 and c0t2d0 is another 2 RAW disk. But ,If you understand , in logic the member driver of rpool c0t0d0s0 should same with c0t0d0p1s0 (...

It shows the physical disks on the server bash-2.05b# format Searching for disks...done AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c0t2d0 <SUN18G cyl 7506 alt 2 hd 19 sec 248> /sbus at 3,0/SUNW,fas at 3,8800000/sd at 2,0 1. c0t3d0 <SUN18G cyl 7506 alt 2 hd 19 sec 248> /sbus at 3,0/SUNW,fas at 3,8800000/sd at 3,0 2. c0t4d0 <SUN18G cyl 7506 alt 2 hd 19 sec 248> /sbus at...

...P /sec %CP /sec %CP 16 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ csmith-desktop,8G,,,190853,95,119364,42,,,245770,28,421.4,1,16,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++ zpool create internal c0t0d0 zpool add internal c0t1d0 zpool add internal c0t2d0 zpool add internal c0t3d0 zpool add internal c0t4d0 zpool add internal c0t5d0 zpool add internal c0t6d0 zpool add internal c0t7d0 ./bonnie++ -d /internal/ -s 8g -u0 -f Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite-...

...c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE...

...c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0...

...t be imported. Attach the missing devices and try again. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-6X config: data UNAVAIL missing device raidz1 DEGRADED c0t0d0 ONLINE c0t1d0 ONLINE replacing ONLINE c0t2d0 ONLINE c0t7d0 ONLINE c0t3d0 UNAVAIL cannot open c0t4d0 ONLINE c0t5d0 ONLINE c0t6d0 ONLINE Additional devices are known to be part of this pool, though their exact configuration cannot be determined....

...extended device statistics r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 0 c0t0d0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 0 c0t1d0 20.4 145.0 1315.8 3714.5 0.0 2.8 0.0 16.8 0 21 c0t2d0 21.4 143.2 1380.2 3711.3 0.0 4.1 0.0 25.1 0 27 c0t3d0 23.4 138.4 1509.3 3693.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 9.8 0 17 c0t4d0 20.8 137.8 1341.6 3693.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 14.7 0 21 c0t5d0 This message posted from opensolaris.org

...0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t0d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open errors: No known data errors James Dickens uadmin.blogspot.com ----...

...are not recommended. ZFS might work properly on such devices, but less-than-optimal performance might be the result".. so with this in mind. ZFS vs UFS/SVM: UFS File systems are created using SVM ZFS File systems are created using the disks. So using the same disks eg.... c0t0d0 / c0t1d0 / c0t2d0 / c0t3d0 1) Create STRIPE 2) Create Mirror 3) Create RAID-5 And run bunch of performance tests. We''re using SWAT for measuring I/O. -D This message posted from opensolaris.org

...bly in a degraded state. action: Wait for the resilver to complete. scrub: resilver in progress for 0h56m, 23.78% done, 3h1m to go config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM data DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 DE...

Hi, i try to run Nero Bruning Rom 5.0 under Wine ! I had installed it with the wine release 20010731 that came with my suse 7.3 after adding the line [scsi c0t2d0] "Device" = "/dev/sg0" to my ~/.wine/config it ran fine and was able to burn CDs on my teac cd-r55s scsi recorder. Only some minor graphic glitches were annoying. The i removed wine build 20010731 and dowloaded the preview 5 version (release 20011108) from codeweavers (rpm) a...

Hello, I am not sure if I am posting in the correct forum, but it seems somewhat zfs related, so I thought I''d share it. While the machine was idle, I started a scrub. Around the time the scrubbing was supposed to be finished, the machine panicked. This might be related to the ''metadata corruption'' that happened earlier to me. Here is the log, any ideas? Oct 24

...ocessors), 2.67GHz -24GB RAM - J4400 for storage (JBOD) # zpool status zpl1 pool: zpl1 state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zpl1 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONL...

1. I have a 4x18GB drive setup as RAIDZ. Now when thinking about it in terms of RAID5 I would expect to get (4-1)x18 worth of drive space, but DF -h shows 4x18. Is this a bug or do I not understand? 2. Once again thinking in RAID5 terms if I have 4X18GB and 12X9GB drives and I want to make a RAIDZ of all of them I would expect the 18GB to be treated at 9GB so the RAIDZ would be 16X9GB. Is