search for: butthead

...derstand how that can be. We have made *many dramatic API changes* in those releases, surely this isn't the only problem you have hit. Are you using the C++ APIs? We try to keep the C apis as stable as possible, is it possible to use those? Just to be clear, I'm not trying to be a butthead about this :). I just see that API stability in almost a binary way: you either try to keep it or not. If not, I don't think that trying to paper over small changes like this is worth it. > In fact, you could have just taken the LLVM 2.5 > raw_fd_ostream constructor, turned the...

Chris Lattner wrote: > Given that we don't guarantee backwards compatibility and prefer to keep > our APIs clean and tidy, why should we take this? I already said that: To make it easier for out-of-tree frontends to support at least the last few LLVM versions. If that's a low priority then don't. I can live with it. Please understand that I don't complain about API breakage

Hello samba-bugs, I trying to share by samba(2.0.3) allready maped novell directory (maped by ncpmount): ncpmount -S CAPITAL -U butthead -P 12345 /tmp/samba/novell smb.conf: [form618] comment = none writeable = Yes path = /tmp/samba/novell/bank/BANK/618_PO read only = No create mask = 0666 guest ok = Yes...

...can be.  We have made *many dramatic API > changes* in those releases, surely this isn't the only problem you > have hit.  Are you using the C++ APIs?  We try to keep the C apis as > stable as possible, is it possible to use those? > > Just to be clear, I'm not trying to be a butthead about this :).  I > just see that API stability in almost a binary way: you either try to > keep it or not.  If not, I don't think that trying to paper over small > changes like this is worth it. Mmm... I agree in general, but I think it's worth considering that this change could...

...//mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2004-June/001252.html I'm happy to say that Vladimir Prus contributed a constant expression lowering pass for instruction selectors to use. This pass makes instruction selection both easier and less error prone. Thanks Vladimir, and sorry for being such a butthead about it earlier on the list. :) -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

I've got Asterisk up and running nicely using a couple of different softphones. Audio quality is suffering a bit due to the hardware that I am working with. So I tried to use a Polycom hardphone but the politics is enough to give you a headache. Polycom seems to support SIP only if you buy it thought their vendors. So I'm looking at a Cisco phone. Has anyone successfully implemented

Hi, I like to know if anyone has ever gotten samba to work on Sun Solaris on a Novell Network. I don't have an issue with installation on Sun Solaris that works fine. But I've never put Samba on a Novell Network Before. Please describe any steps or issue with this. Phillip B. Bruce, Manager > kpmg Consulting > Network Engineering & Integration >