search for: buki

Be ERECT in less than 15 mins PRlCE: $ 2 / use visit our website --> goldslive.net

Anybody successfully using the Stallion EC8/32-AT on -stable? I just tried using the one I got on ebay and found that it hands on port close and passes no characters at all. Do any of the stallion cards work? Warner

I have a simple goal: to use PAM to do my TIS authsrv authentications. I have Mark Roth's pam_authsrv module -- it works fine. + I can configure openssh for PAM, and it works fine (negotiating ssh2 keyboard interactive auth method). + I can configure ssh.com-3.0.1 for PAM, and it also works fine (negotiating ssh2 pam-1 at ssh.com auth method). Unfortunately, the openssh client

Hi, Is there any hope getting openssh to support a sequence of several authentication methods (requiring different passwords) for one login? I.e. take the standard static password, feed it into pam_unix.so for verification, then ask the user for yet another password (e.g. a one-time password) and verify this one by a different PAM module Currently, verifying either a static password or a one time

We've been holding back on this release to coincide with the Asterisk 1.4.0 release. This is mostly a compatibility release, but there are a few new features: * No longer requires register_globals in PHP * Separated code from configuration settings in ./lib/defines.php (hopefully this will make future upgrades easier) * Migrated all database interfaces to PEAR::DB which

...59 contexts. =- > > -- > > Ben Franklin quote: > > "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary > Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Single server stats, 50 user system, -= 238 extensions (870 priorities) in 57 contexts. =- - Buki -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061011/9b95f0db/attachment.htm

...ve been using the Web Meet-Me 2.1.0 on Asterisk 1.2.12.1 for many months now and I am a big fan and I have been very happy with it. I want to try the v3.0.0 but I would like to know if there are specific steps I need to carry out to upgrade to the v3.0.0 on my current Asterisk 1.2.X? Warm Regards, Buki (Naija Man) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070107/bb338628/attachment.htm

Guys, anybody has seen or is using some kind of softphone on any square screen device with WM5? Ive tried sjlabs one and xten for pocket pc and they do work on Wm5 but they are designed for standard screens, anybody using anything on square ones?

What is the best way to have 1 phone check multiple voicemail accounts. I am using polycom 650 phones, and am wondering if mwi can work when checking multiple accounts. -Chris Sent from my BlackBerry? wireless handheld

I've already sunk several hours into this without any real progress, so I'd really appreciate any help My task is simple -- establish a connection between a softphone on XP ProSP2 to a Asterisk server on Linux FC4 over a LAN through a Netgear router. The server will then go out to a PSTN termination service. Thus far, the PSTN termination connection works fine -- I've opened up 4569

Hello! In my relentless quest for knowledge, I pose this question: who's got the biggest dialplans, and how big are these monsters? What's the biggest dialplan in use right now? If you feel you are a competitor, let me know how many contexts/extensions/priorities you are dealing with. Maybe the context with the most extensions, the extension with the most priorities would be

Hi, during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one of the problems was that some people would like to use freebsd-update but can't as they are using a custom kernel. With all the kernel modules we provide, the need for a custom kernel should be small, but on the other hand, we do not provide a small kernel-skeleton where you can load just the modules you need.

I haven't recompiled since 3.5p1. I compile --with-privsep-user=nobody * I observe that none of my processes is uid "nobody". In addition, previously I had to disable privsep on either AIX or OSF1 (I forget which), this time it just worked. I was thinking it was because Progress Had Been Made. Now, observing so many root processes, I think it's because privsep is not actually