search for: buka

> On May 10, 2019, at 8:59 PM, Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Sorry for delay, I was busy with other stuff. > CTMark results. > > dse is the current DSE. > dsem is my experimental module level DSE. > dsem runs after dse, so it's additionally deleted stores. > > -...

Can you post numbers for how many stores get eliminated from CTMark? > On Apr 16, 2019, at 11:45 AM, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > > I tried -Os and effect of new approach significantly increases. > I run regular DSE and immediately myDSE. With -Os myDSE removes more than 50% of DSE number. > Which is expected as -Os inlines less and regular DSE can't remove over funct...

Yes, zlib build for LTO will work, but user will have to build this lib from zlib source code anyway. On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:01 PM Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Is it possible to add zlib source code into llvm repo? Any advice on how > to do so? > > I'd like to setup build of symbolizer as a static library with no external > dependencies except libc. &g...

Hi all, Is it possible to add zlib source code into llvm repo? Any advice on how to do so? I'd like to setup build of symbolizer as a static library with no external dependencies except libc. Similar to https://github.com/google/sanitizers/blob/master/address-sanitizer/internal_symbolizer/howto . Then the library can be linked into sanitized program and avoid dependency on standalone

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:37 AM Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I have no idea how. > Are there particular problems? Now it should be quite. > Console has a bunch of stale builders which are even less useful. > LLVM has a silent build master that does not send email. When Nico added the gn...

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:02 PM Amara Emerson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Apr 15, 2019, at 1:51 PM, Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Hi JF, > > > > I've heard that you are interested DSE improvements and maybe we need to be in sync. > > So far I experimented with following DSE improvements: > > > > * Cross-block DSE...

...fter union and call to q(), without LTO we can't remove that store. 2. shortcut which I have which ignores all instructions q() . this assume that memset to acpar.match, acpar.matchinfo also useful which is not true. I should be able to improve this case. On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:29 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > On a first look case like this should nor be a problem. The tail of the > memset here is unused because it's replaced immediately without reads . So > it can be trimmed. I will try the patch and let you know. > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9...

Hi JF, I've heard that you are interested DSE improvements and maybe we need to be in sync. So far I experimented with following DSE improvements: * Cross-block DSE, it eliminates additional 7% stores comparing to existing DSE. But it's not visible on benchmarks. * Cross-block + Interprocedural analysis to annotate each function argument with: - can read before write - will

Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same script as sanitizer-x86_64-linux. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:19, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be > a functional equivalent of the old one. > We need to stress

...) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > ps4-buildslave2 -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > > Hexagon QA <llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com> > hexagon-build-02 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 > hexagon-build-03 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 > > Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> > sanitizer-buildbot6 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 > > Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> > sanitizer-windows -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > > Ilia Taraban <mstester.llvm at gmail.com> > windows7-buil...

...wrote: > Thanks Vitaly and Peter, > > I went with a modified version of the instructions from > https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/MemorySanitizerBootstrappingClang > — that’s a very helpful set of instructions! > > Cheers > > > On 31 Aug 2018, at 02:55, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > > > > Another option is just to run corresponding script from > https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/zorg/trunk/zorg/buildbot/builders/sanitizers/ > in empty directory. > > > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 5:00 AM Peter Smith via llvm-...

...ystem. The Builtins-aarch64-linux test failures have disappeared after I set the PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variables to point to $HOME/stage1/bin and $HOME/stage1/lib. But I still see the tools/gold/X86 and OpenMP test failures. Thanks, -- Bryan On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:03 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > Can you please share the full cmake command line? > > On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 11:28, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > >> +Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> to help with the links to build >> bots. >&...

...most obvious is to group rules by their top-level gMIR > instruction. This would reduce the cost of the std::sort that handles the > rule priorities in generating the source file and will also make it simpler > for the compiler to compile it. > > > On 21 May 2017, at 11:16, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > > It must be r303341, I commented on corresponding llvm-commits thread. > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Diana Picus via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Ok, thanks. I'll try to do a bisect next w...

...0) >>> >>> Hexagon QA <llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com <mailto:llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com>> >>> hexagon-build-02 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 >>> hexagon-build-03 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 >>> >>> Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com <mailto:vitalybuka at google.com>> >>> sanitizer-buildbot6 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 >>> >>> Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com <mailto:rnk at google.com>> >>> sanitizer-windows -- Microsoft (R)...

...bot. > We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will > need more love and care. > > Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting > AnnotatedCommand. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:57 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com > <mailto:vitalybuka at google.com>> wrote: > > It looks like all sanitizer builder are still offline > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders > > On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 00:34, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits > <cfe-commi...

It looks like all sanitizer builder are still offline http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 00:34, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits < cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The staging buildbot was up and running for 6 days now, and looks good. > > Tomorrow at 12:00 PM PDT we will switch the production buildbot to the new >

...l gMIR >>> instruction. This would reduce the cost of the std::sort that handles the >>> rule priorities in generating the source file and will also make it simpler >>> for the compiler to compile it. >>> >>> >>> On 21 May 2017, at 11:16, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: >>> >>> It must be r303341, I commented on corresponding llvm-commits thread. >>> >>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Diana Picus via llvm-dev >>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> >&gt...

...their top-level gMIR >> instruction. This would reduce the cost of the std::sort that handles the >> rule priorities in generating the source file and will also make it >> simpler >> for the compiler to compile it. >> >> >> On 21 May 2017, at 11:16, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: >> >> It must be r303341, I commented on corresponding llvm-commits thread. >> >> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Diana Picus via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> >> Ok, thanks. I'...

...gt; need more love and care. > > > > > > Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting > > > AnnotatedCommand. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Galina > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:57 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com > > > <mailto:vitalybuka at google.com>> wrote: > > > > > > It looks like all sanitizer builder are still offline > > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders > > > > > > On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 00:34...

...the std::sort that handles the >>>>>> rule priorities in generating the source file and will also make it simpler >>>>>> for the compiler to compile it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 21 May 2017, at 11:16, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com <mailto:vitalybuka at google.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> It must be r303341, I commented on corresponding llvm-commits thread. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Diana Picus vi...