Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3163 matches for "bt's".
Did you mean:
b's
2010 Jun 17
3
how to use sapply code
Hi,
I have this code here and try to use sapply code. But I got error message that I don't really understand to correct.
bt <- c(24.96874, 19.67861, 23.51001, 19.86868); round(bt,2)
alp <- c(2.724234, 3.914649, 3.229146, 3.120719); round(alp,2)
bt_alp <- data.frame(bt,alp)
sapply(bt_alp, function(bt,alp) ((bt_m/bt)^alp), bt_m = min(bt))
> sapply(bt_alp, function(bt,alp) ((bt_m/bt)^alp), bt_m = min(bt))...
2006 Sep 20
1
help with function
Hello everyone,
I have a function here that I wrote but doesn't seem to work quite
right. Attached is the code. In the calib funcion under the for loop
Bt[i+2]<-(1-m)*Bt[i+1]+Rt[i]*Rerr-Ct[i+1] returns NA's for everything
after years 1983 and 1984. However the code works when it reads
Bt[i+2]<-(1-m)*Bt[i+1]+Rt[i]*Rerr-Ct[i]. I don't quite understand why
since it should be calculating all of the necessary inputs prior to
calculating Bt...
2010 Jun 17
1
sapply or apply
Hi r-users,
I have this code here :
dt <- winter_pos_sum
bt <- c(24.96874, 19.67861, 23.51001, 19.86868); round(bt,2)
alp <- c(2.724234, 3.914649, 3.229146, 3.120719); round(alp,2)
bt_min <- min(bt) ; bt_min
p <- alp_sum ; p
t <- 50
t1 <- t+1
#first get the sum over the eigenvalues for a particular power i
gam...
2006 Sep 19
1
-Need help with function
Hello everyone,
I have a function here that I wrote but doesn't seem to work quite
right. Attached is the code. In the calib funcion under the for loop
Bt[i+2]<-(1-m)*Bt[i+1]+Rt[i]*Rerr-Ct[i+1] returns NA's for everything
after years 1983 and 1984. However the code works when it reads
Bt[i+2]<-(1-m)*Bt[i+1]+Rt[i]*Rerr-Ct[i]. I don't quite understand why
since it should be calculating all of the necessary inputs prior to
calculating Bt...
2011 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Transition C->bitcode->assembly->object looses frame pointers
Below is an example of using backtrace() obtained from man backtrace
and the test results:
$ gcc bt.c -o bt-gcc
$ ./bt-gcc 4
backtrace() returned 4 addresses
./bt-gcc() [0x4007e3]
./bt-gcc() [0x400874]
./bt-gcc() [0x40089b]
./bt-gcc() [0x400894]
$ llvm-gcc bt.c -o bt-llvm-gcc
$ ./bt-llvm-gcc 4
backtrace() returned 4 addresses
./bt-llvm-...
2004 Aug 20
3
BT Communicator (SIP???) and Asterisk
Hi All
BT are providing a SIP gateway for PSTN through the BT communicator with
Yahoo Messenger, I have done an ethereal trace and found that the BT
Communicator side of the software is using SIP, so in theory I could add
more PSTN lines to Asterisk for BT using SIP, but I am having problems
deciphering...
2010 Dec 14
0
Merge() error
...tch.names(clabs, names(xi)) :
names do not match previous names
Error.
I've found other people discussing this error, but they don't seem to match
my situation, and the strange thing is that changing the order of the data
frames that I'm merging can remove the error.
For example:
bt <- merge(assessmentb, assessmentb2, by=("caseid"), all=TRUE)
bt <- merge(bt, tbassessment2, by=("caseid"), all=TRUE)
bt <- merge(bt, tbarms2, by=("caseid"), all=TRUE)
bt <- merge(bt, tbstudydetail, by=("caseid"), all=TRUE)
But if I change it...
2006 Oct 26
4
porting numbers in UK telewest/bt/adept
A client used to use BT isdn30 and ported the numbers to telewest
several years ago.
Now, the client moved to adept telecom. I *think* adept resells BT
products. We got new numbers from adept (bt?) and the old pbx on the
telewest lines forwards the calls to the new numbers.
On the adept line I got a digium card in an opte...
2013 Sep 23
1
Centos 6.4 on Xserve, IPMI error
...device (0002 -> 0003)
ipmi_si 0000:09:00.4: PCI INT C -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
ipmi_si: Adding PCI-specified kcs state machine
ipmi_si 0000:09:00.7: enable device (0000 -> 0003)
ipmi_si 0000:09:00.7: PCI INT D -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
ipmi_si: Adding PCI-specified bt state machine
ipmi_si: Trying PCI-specified kcs state machine at mem address 0x90841000, slave address 0x0 irq 16
IRQ 16/ipmi_si: IRQF_DISABLED is not guaranteed on shared IRQs
Using irq 16
ipmi: Found new BMC (man_id: 0x00003f, prod_id: 0x0003, dev_id: 0x20)
IPMI kcs interface initialized
ipmi_...
2011 Apr 05
3
[LLVMdev] Transition C->bitcode->assembly->object looses frame pointers
Hi James,
We've indeed passed the appropriate (and even excessive) flags to the
appropriate pipeline parts, that is:
llvm-gcc -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointers -g $in -emit-llvm -S -o $name.ll
llc --disable-fp-elim $name.ll -o $name.S
g++ -fno-omit-frame-pointers -c $name.S
, but that didn't work
Alex
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:40 PM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote:
2011 Apr 05
2
[LLVMdev] Transition C->bitcode->assembly->object looses frame pointers
Hi Alexander, while I can reproduce the problem with your example,
inspection of the assembler shows that the frame pointer is being
correctly set up in each function. So I don't think the problem
is due to frame pointer elimination.
Ciao, Duncan.
2011 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Transition C->bitcode->assembly->object looses frame pointers
Hi Alexander, I took a look at how backtrace works and it doesn't use
the frame pointer at all, instead it uses dwarf unwind tables. So to
make it work using llc you need to do as follows:
$ llc -unwind-tables bt.ll -o bt.S
$ gcc -o bt-llc bt.S
$ ./bt-llc 4
backtrace() returned 4 addresses
./bt-llc() [0x4007aa]
./bt-llc() [0x400856]
./bt-llc() [0x40087c]
./bt-llc() [0x400875]
Ciao, Duncan.
2015 Jan 23
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
I suspect that this is because the mask in your example is the result of a variable shift, which (a) has it’s own performance and flags hazards pre-SHLX and (b) requires additional µops to do with TEST. I expect that ICC is putting a dummy TEST or XOR ahead of the BT to break the false flags dependency, as well.
If the mask were constant, I expect ICC would generate TEST instead (but I don’t have it handy to check).
– Steve
> On Jan 23, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com> wrote:
>
> If 'bt' is a perf sin, icc d...
2008 Mar 18
6
Call signalling on BT FeatureLine Compact (Sangoma A200)
Hi,
I have a TrixBox install with a Sangoma A200 and 4 FXO ports, there
are 3 BT lines connected directly to these ports.
One of the lines has BT FeatureLine Compact and this is the line I am
having problems with, the other 2 lines are working perfectly,
detecting CID, answering incoming calls and placing external calls via
SIP devices.
I am receiving a error log entry:
chan...
2008 Sep 15
1
UK call initiating party hangup control on analog home lines
I suppose this is rather an informative e-mail than a question. However if
people had similar experiences or could comment what the differences are in
other countries or with business analog lines, it would be interesting. It took
me a week until a BT engineer was sent to my home home, since BT tech support
was unable to provide information about the problem.
Problem: Calling party controls how long the line will stay open once it is
connected.
Example: When asterisk box receives a call, it answers, perhaps takes a voice
message and issues han...
2008 Sep 10
0
[RFC][PATCH -mm] blktrace: adds ioprio to blktrace
Hi,
The following patch adds ioprio to blktrace.
Explanation:
As you know, I/O schedulers such as cfq use io_contexts of current
tasks to schedule block I/O. But recently, some are suggesting to
use more appropriate io_contexts obtained by, for example, doing
io-tracking, making struct bio have io_context member, etc. I thought
adding ioprio to blktrace output might be helpful.
Implementation:
1. I used req_get_ioprio() and [new]bio_get_ioprio() to get ioprio.
Currently bio_get_ioprio just returns current->io_context-...
2005 Feb 19
16
Snom phone hint exten question
...rying to get the Snom 190's and soon to arrive 3com 3102's to use the
function keys and for the life of me I can't work it out from the
conversations on the archive what I am going exactly wrong here?
The snom 190 with function keys is extension 690, the other extension
(691) is just a BT102 so it doesn't have any function keys to program.
When extension 691 is dialing out, or receives a call I want it to just
tell the snom190 on ext 690 so the light shows up.
(Soon as I got it going here I have a live system I will be setting it
up on).
Thank you to anyone in advance for the...
2007 Jan 19
2
Disconnect Supervision UK / BT solution?
Hi all
I'm using sangoma a200 cards in the UK and have the ongoing, often noted
problem of disconnect supervision with BT POTS lines.
Just noticed this post on
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/UK+Asterisk+Details
stating that potentially someone's got a solution :
"TDM400P & Not Detecting Hangups:
Got a TDM400P installed and having problems with Asterisk not detecting
hangups? Using BT? If so, c...
2008 Jun 22
2
OT: Making BT/Yahoo account accessible to plain router
My daughter has a BT account, with a BT supplied single-port router. I'd like
to replace it with a standard router, but the settings appear to be totally
hidden. If anyone reading uses BT, could you please tell me where to find
the info? Maybe off-list, to save bandwidth for others/ Thanks
Anne
2006 May 26
3
UK experts only. BT Outgoing caller ID not showing
...number changes but nothing I
can do sets the outgoing caller id. We're using the same version of idefisk and
the same version of asterisk (1.2.4-bri stuffed).
I found a wiki which said that the DDI numbers we want as caller IDs need to be
flagged as allowed CallerID number - this is done by BT - but BT do not seem to
understand this.
Also our old local exchange was a System X but the new one is System Y.
Anyone any ideas on this?
Paul