search for: brided

On 15/05/2023 11:50, Johannes Nixdorf wrote: > This is a convenience setting, which allows the administrator to limit > the default limit of FDB entries for all created bridges, instead of > having to set it for each created bridge using the netlink property. > > The setting is network namespace local, and defaults to 0, which means > unlimited, for backwards compatibility

On Mon, 15 May 2023 10:50:46 +0200 Johannes Nixdorf <jnixdorf-oss at avm.de> wrote: > +static struct ctl_table br_sysctl_table[] = { > + { > + .procname = "bridge-fdb-max-entries-default", That name is too long. Also, all the rest of bridge code does not use sysctl's. Why is this special and why should the property be global and not per bridge? NAK

I have been asking on the qemu list how to get bridge network mode working under centos 4... To no avail. The following script is what I have tried as my /etc/qemu-ifup. It supposedly worked for fedora. #!/bin/sh # # qemu_up # # script to bring up the tun device in QEMU in bridged mode # # This script bridges eth0 and tap0. First take eth0 down, then bring it up with IP 0.0.0.0 # /sbin/ifdown

I have these interfaces listed. eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.1.8 netmask 255.255.252.0 broadcast 192.168.3.255 inet6 fe80::e2d5:5eff:fe63:abe5 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> ether e0:d5:5e:63:ab:e5 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 42411243 bytes 4701898681 (4.3 GiB) RX errors 0 dropped 156

Tom Eastep wrote: > | Have you applied the ipsec+netfilter patches ? Without them, packets > are > | only seen encrypted in the OUTPUT chain. > | > Yes -- the ipsec+netfilter patches are applied. Here is the same test > with the bridge removed and the local ip address transfered to one of > the network cards: The problem is ipv4_sabotage_out in the briding code. It

I've been playing around with using ov_test and ov_test_open as an alternative to ov_open in the xmms plugin's vorbis_check_file function. xmms never bothers to cache the result of a file check, so it tends to happen rather a lot. Unfortunately ov_test_open returns OV_EINVAL because ov_test seems to have left vf->ready_state to OPEN rather than PARTOPEN. I'm presuming this is

Hi everybody! Can you give me a hint, how can I start a call from asterisk with some (php, bash, etc) script? I need to start two calls and bride it together. Thank you. -- Suich

Hi, Here are two, small feature changes I would like to submit to increase the usefulness of the multicast snooping of the bridge code. The first patch is an unaltered one I had submitted before, but since it got no feedback I'm resubmitting it here for net-next. With the recently added patch to disable snooping if there is no querier (b00589af + 248ba8ec05 + 8d50af4fb), it should be a safe

Hi, I wonder about the performance of a Linux box used as router (I guest I''m not the first :). Althought I know it mainly depends on the hardware, I''m trying to find some references on the topic or comparations with other routing solutions (FreeBSD box used as router, Cisco, etc). For example, http://facweb.cti.depaul.edu/jyu/Publications/Yu-Linux-TSM2004.pdf (althought is

Hi list, I get the error "Not unique table/alias" (myql 4.1) when trying eager load 2 classes that use the same base class (not STI) Example: <code> class Wedding < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :bride, :class_name => ''Person'', :foreign_key => ''bride_id'' belongs_to :groom, :class_name => ''Person'',

I'm wanting to have a phone at home next to the garage door that when my bride comes home, she can see that there is a new message, push a button and have the messages played to her. Otherwise, she will not let me install asterisk on my home line. Can someone suggest relatively inexpensive hardware that will do this for me (us)? Thanks, -Peter

Please point me in the right direction.... My ISP is giving me an IPv6 prefix, but to get that I have to: The current Speedstream ADSL router will be configured as a bridge. I will have to set up a Linux (read Centos, I hope) router that will connect ethernet to the Speedstream but run PPPoE to his network and get both the IPv4 and IPv6 route delegations. There is no easy way that I know of

Yes, I know, XP-SP3 is very old. It works for what I need it for. I have some programs that will never be updated for Win 7. Note that XP-SP3 and Fedora 14 work together just fine, so I'm guessing that a newer version of Samba is what is keeping me from logging in from XP. But, I do not know what to put in the smb.conf file to allow XP to mount a share. Here is the output from testparm:

Hello, Just curious if anyone has used shorewall on a Linux Bridge? I know you would have to apply the bridge firewalling patch, but could you then define the bride device in the /etc/shorewall/interfaces, turn on multi, and have it work? Could it be this simple? -- Regards Joseph Watson

My very first xen DomU can not ping anything on my network. Well that is not entirely true, it can ping itself. I did not touch any of the scripts in /etc/xen so xen should be using bridging. My pc is running xen-unstable and uses a 3Com PCI 3c905B Just after the ''xen start'' on Dom0 brctl shows: bash-3.00# brctl show xenbr0 bridge name bridge id STP

How to check which all network card are part of xenbr0 and what way i can add additional nic on the fly in the xenbr0 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

-- Attempting native bridge of IAX2/peer1-iax-7 and IAX2/peer2-21 I want everything to stay in the VoIP server rather then briding. I have notransfer=yes on, but it still seems to bridge the call natively.. can I keep the RTP stream on the asterisk server some how?

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19533.5BC03B40 Content-Type: text/plain I've been porting a library from the STATLIB site from S+ to R. Unfortunately, I don't have the capability to test the port against the original application. Is there anyone out there who

Hi, We have some 100 Servers (includes both Intel and PPC based systems). Is there any way to easly install OS (different flavours of Linux) on these systems ? We do not have control over the DHCP Server settings so is there any way to do this with out touching the DHCP Server ? We have static IPs for all the systems. Regards, Naveen

I have this problem with the POSIX functions >version _ platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch x86 os Win32 system x86, Win32 status major 1 minor 3.1 year 2001 month 08 day 31 language R > > dates <-