samba - Jun 2017 - Fedora 25 Samba and XP-SP3

Hello list,

a few days ago we migrated our shares to a DFS cluster, also we disabled 
SMBv1 protocol. Now we are no longer able to connect to the shares with 
our linux workstations. The setup looks like this:

linux workstation -----> AD server (Windows Server 2008 R2) -----> file 
server (Windows Server 2016, running in 2008 R2 compat mode)

I have searched the web for a solution on the last few days. Mostly it 
came down to this:

Take care that smbclient, cifs-utils and keyutils is installed. Also 
have these lines in /etc/request-key.conf:

create  cifs.spnego     *       *               /usr/sbin/cifs.upcall %k
create  dns_resolver    *       *               /usr/sbin/cifs.upcall %k

My setup satisfies these requirements. I have tried the connection with 
these commands (I replaced our domain with example.com):

mount -v -t cifs //office.example.com/technik /mnt/dfs -o 
username=c.garling,domain=OFFICE,vers=2.0
mount -v -t cifs //office.example.com/technik /mnt/dfs -o 
username=c.garling,domain=OFFICE,vers=2.1

If I do so I can see this in tcpdump:

100.392000390 192.168.23.107 -> 192.168.15.6 SMB2 172 Negotiate Protocol 
Request
100.393121936 192.168.15.6 -> 192.168.23.107 SMB2 318 Negotiate Protocol 
Response
100.393223968 192.168.23.107 -> 192.168.15.6 SMB2 190 Session Setup 
Request, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE
100.394178092 192.168.15.6 -> 192.168.23.107 SMB2 390 Session Setup 
Response, Error: STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED, NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE
100.394295512 192.168.23.107 -> 192.168.15.6 SMB2 494 Session Setup 
Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: OFFICE\c.garling
100.397795864 192.168.15.6 -> 192.168.23.107 SMB2 142 Session Setup Response
100.397895000 192.168.23.107 -> 192.168.15.6 SMB2 198 Tree Connect 
Request Tree: \\office.example.com\technik
100.398866908 192.168.15.6 -> 192.168.23.107 SMB2 143 Tree Connect 
Response, Error: STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME

My client directly tries to connect to the share on 192.168.15.6, but 
this is the AD server that should forward to 192.168.15.17 which is the 
file server.

I also traced the connection attempt with wireshark. In the request sent 
from my workstation I found this message in the flags:

"This host does NOT support DFS."

We re-enabled SMBv1 for testing purposes. With SMBv1 the connection to 
the DFS works with the command above but vers=1.0.

I can not figure out why DFS does not work when vers=2.0 or vers=2.1 
will be used. We tested some different distros (Linux Mint 18.1, Debian 
8, Debian 9, Gentoo) with different kernel versions.

Please ask me for further information, if I missed something.

Any help is welcome!

Regards, Christian Garling

Christian Garling via samba wrote:
> Take care that smbclient, cifs-utils and keyutils is installed. Also 
> have these lines in /etc/request-key.conf:
>
> create  cifs.spnego     *       *               /usr/sbin/cifs.upcall %k
> create  dns_resolver    *       *               /usr/sbin/cifs.upcall %k
>
> My setup satisfies these requirements. I have tried the connection 
> with these commands (I replaced our domain with example.com):
>
> mount -v -t cifs //office.example.com/technik /mnt/dfs -o 
> username=c.garling,domain=OFFICE,vers=2.0
> mount -v -t cifs //office.example.com/technik /mnt/dfs -o 
> username=c.garling,domain=OFFICE,vers=2.1
Isn't "mount.cifs" and the upcall stuff under the
"linux-cifs" project --
a separate project from samba these days? 

Someone on the samba list might know the answers, but if you are having
a problem with the linux mount.cifs command mounting a Windows CIFS share
you might find more help on the linux-cifs list (@vger.kernel.org).

Looking at your dump, I saw a weirdity:
>
> If I do so I can see this in tcpdump:
> ...
> 100.394295512 192.168.23.107 -> 192.168.15.6 SMB2 494 Session Setup 
> Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: OFFICE\c.garling
> 100.397795864 192.168.15.6 -> 192.168.23.107 SMB2 142 Session Setup 
> Response
> 100.397895000 192.168.23.107 -> 192.168.15.6 SMB2 198 Tree Connect 
> Request Tree: \\office.example.com\technik
> 100.398866908 192.168.15.6 -> 192.168.23.107 SMB2 143 Tree Connect 
> Response, Error: STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME
\\office.example.com doesn't look like a valid machine name.  Do you 
have any idea how you might be getting from User 'OFFICE\c.garling' to a
rather odd
looking machine name (or did you just substitute that in?)...

Yes, I know, XP-SP3 is very old.  It works for what I need it for.  I have
some programs that will never be updated for Win 7.

Note that XP-SP3 and Fedora 14 work together just fine, so I'm guessing that
a newer version of Samba is what is keeping me from logging in from XP.
But, I do not know what to put in the smb.conf file to allow XP to mount
a share.

Here is the output from testparm:

Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384)
Processing section "[homes]"
Processing section "[usenet]"
Processing section "[video]"
Processing section "[website]"
Processing section "[tmp]"
Loaded services file OK.
Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE

# Global parameters
[global]
server string = Linux Samba Server
workgroup = VIDIOT
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
security = USER
idmap config * : backend = tdb
cups options = raw
hosts allow = 127. 192.168.1.


[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = No
read only = No


[usenet]
        comment = Linux usenet area
        path = /WebDisk/share_download/usenet
        read only = No


[video]
        comment = Video Files Workspace
        path = /WebDisk/ftp/pub
        read only = No


[website]
        comment = Web Server HTML Area
        path = /WebDisk/http/htdocs/vidiot
        read only = No


[tmp]
        comment = Temporary file space
        path = /WebDisk/tmp
        guest ok = Yes
        read only = No

When I try and map "W: \\192.168.1.11\website" and use brown as the
login
name and my password, it goes off to do its thing and a wee bit later it
comes back with the login GUI.  The only entries in the log file are those
resulting from stopping and starting the smb service with restart (in order
to reread the config file).

Tried it with encryption of the password with yes (default) and no.

Thanks for any tips that might fix this issue.

MB
-- 
e-mail: vidiot at vidiot.com | vidiot at vidiot.net            /~\ The ASCII
        6082066843 at email.uscc.net (140 char limit)       \ / Ribbon Campaign
Visit - URL: http://vidiot.com/                           X  Against
             http://vidiot.net/                          / \ HTML Email
"You're Sherlock Holmes, wear the damn hat!" - Watson to Sherlock
Sherlock - The Abominable Bride - 1/01/16

Hi Christian,

Christian Garling via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
writes:
> a few days ago we migrated our shares to a DFS cluster, also we disabled 
> SMBv1 protocol. Now we are no longer able to connect to the shares with 
> our linux workstations. The setup looks like this:
Regardless of you dns config, you need a fairly recent kernel (4.11 or
above) to support DFS with SMB2+.

-- 
Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97  8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Hi Aurélien,

is there some documentation around where I can read about that? Where 
can I find the information, that I need Kernel 4.11 or above to get DFS 
with SMB2.0 / 2.1 / 3.0 and above working?

Regards, Christian


Am 12.06.2017 um 12:46 schrieb Aurélien Aptel:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Christian Garling via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes:
>> a few days ago we migrated our shares to a DFS cluster, also we
disabled
>> SMBv1 protocol. Now we are no longer able to connect to the shares with
>> our linux workstations. The setup looks like this:
> Regardless of you dns config, you need a fairly recent kernel (4.11 or
> above) to support DFS with SMB2+.
>