search for: bous

...inform me how we can make it happen that all our models become compatible? Who from your team added the compatibility with PowerWalker VI 850 LCD? Last question: Is there any way to make it happen that our products become compatible with the usbhid_ups module? Please inform me Best regards J?rg Bous Business Development Manager BlueWalker GmbH Martin-Buber-Strasse 12, 41470 Neuss, Germany Email: j.bous at bluewalker.de<mailto:j.bous at bluewalker.de> Phone: +49 (0) 2137 929874 Mobile :+49 (0) 176 56440392 Fax: +49 (0) 2137 - 7873925 Skype : j.bous / MSN: j.bous at hotmail.de<m...

Dear all, I am using the Microsoft Windows XP SP3 and would like to use the Windows MSI installer 2.6.1-1 I tried to configure NUT manually, but until now failed. If possible I would like to use the PowerWalker Line-Interactive VI 1400 device which should work with blazer_usb Does anyone have possibility to provide me the correct configuration for the files (ups.conf, upsd.{users,conf} and

...6-02-15 23:05:09 UTC (rev 2) +++ trunk/control 2006-02-16 10:45:13 UTC (rev 3) @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ Source: xen -Maintainer: Ralph Passgang <ralph@debianbase.de> +Maintainer: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> +Uploaders: Julien Danjou <acid@debian.org>, Jeremy T. Bouse <jbouse@debian.org>, Guido Trotter <ultrotter@debian.org> Section: misc Priority: extra Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0

I just also wanted to mention that I have the current released source tarballs downloaded and placed at http://people.debian.org/~jbouse/xen/ at this time. As the only way to get the source tarballs I've found is via bittorrent unless you want to give your email address I'll continue to keep the the current tarball located there. That is one thing that I noticed about Ralph's packages was the use of a single source...

...any luck have some packaging to test soon. I've got a 64bit AMD waiting on xen-3.0 so I can move my mail and web server from VMWare. Regards, Jeremy -- ------------------------ [ SECURITY NOTICE ] ------------------------ To: pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org. For your security, jbouse@debian.org digitally signed this message on 17 February 2006 at 20:34:30 UTC. Verify this digital signature at http://www.ciphire.com/verify. ------------------- [ CIPHIRE DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] ------------------- Q2lwaGlyZSBTaWcuAjhwa2cteGVuLWRldmVsQGxpc3RzLmFsaW90aC5kZWJpYW4ub3JnA Gpib3VzZUBkZWJpY...

...>.patch files would be better than having to generate the patch during build process, but that may take even more time to coordinate. Regards, Jeremy -- ------------------------ [ SECURITY NOTICE ] ------------------------ To: pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org. For your security, jbouse@debian.org digitally signed this message on 16 February 2006 at 17:53:28 UTC. Verify this digital signature at http://www.ciphire.com/verify. ------------------- [ CIPHIRE DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] ------------------- Q2lwaGlyZSBTaWcuAjhwa2cteGVuLWRldmVsQGxpc3RzLmFsaW90aC5kZWJpYW4ub3JnA Gpib3VzZUBkZWJpY...

Okay since we have a few more people on the list now I see I wanted to get peoples input on a couple things. First of all, I'd like to work on general consensus so I'd like to see what people think of having the list setup to reply back to the list. I know some lists use this and some don't so I'd like to get input on the matter. I'd also like to get input on choice

Author: jbouse Date: 2006-02-17 18:11:04 +0000 (Fri, 17 Feb 2006) New Revision: 14 Modified: trunk/debian/control Log: Updated xen-hypervisor-pae to "Provides: xen-hypervisor" so as to meet the "Depends: xen-hypervisor" used on other packages if the PAE enabled hypervisor is installed....

Now that we've got the script to generate the patch file prior to building the source DEB, do we really need to maintain having wget in the build-depends? With the script we should be the ones generating the patch file and then building the kernel-patch package doesn't need to download the kernel to build. I just noticed this while examining the rules and control files.

...chmod 0755 is there any reason to maintain this within the repository or would 0644 suffice and remove these warnings from dpkg-source? Regards, Jeremy -- ------------------------ [ SECURITY NOTICE ] ------------------------ To: pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org. For your security, jbouse@debian.org digitally signed this message on 23 February 2006 at 18:36:00 UTC. Verify this digital signature at http://www.ciphire.com/verify. ------------------- [ CIPHIRE DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] ------------------- Q2lwaGlyZSBTaWcuAjhwa2cteGVuLWRldmVsQGxpc3RzLmFsaW90aC5kZWJpYW4ub3JnA Gpib3VzZUBkZWJpY...

...an/control 2007-12-04 00:22:52.000000000 +0000 +++ FTBFS_xen-unstable-3.0-unstable+hg11561/debian/control 2007-12-02 01:36:13.000000000 +0000 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Maintainer: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> Uploaders: Julien Danjou <acid at debian.org>, Jeremy T. Bouse <jbouse at debian.org>, Guido Trotter <ultrotter at debian.org>, Bastian Blank <waldi at debian.org> Standards-Version: 3.7.2.0 -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.37.2), python-dev (>= 2.3), libsdl1.2-dev, bcc, dpatch, lsb-release, python-central (>= 0.5), linux-support-...

...xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386-pae now provides xen-hypervisor - Made xen-utils-3.0.postinst more fault-tolerant, so that upgrading xen2 -> xen3 don't fail because of a running xen2 hypervisor - Updated the "Replaces & Conflicts" to a versioned conflict. * Jeremy T. Bouse <jbouse@debian.org> - Renamed xen-hypervisor -> xen-hypervisor-3.0 - Renamed xen-hypervisor-pae -> xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386-pae - Renamed xen-utils -> xen-utils-3.0 - Added "Provides: xen-hypervisor-3.0" to xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386-pae - Set d...

...l --- xen-3.0-3.0.3-0/debian/control 2006-10-23 16:45:06.000000000 -0500 +++ xen-3.0-3.0.3-0.new/debian/control 2006-10-23 16:33:50.036667796 -0500 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Maintainer: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> Uploaders: Julien Danjou <acid@debian.org>, Jeremy T. Bouse <jbouse@debian.org>, Guido Trotter <ultrotter@debian.org>, Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> Standards-Version: 3.7.2.0 -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.37.2), python-dev (>= 2.3), libsdl1.2-dev, bcc, dpatch, lsb-release, python-central (>= 0.5), linux-support-2.6.18-1...

...visor-3.0-i386-pae now provides xen-hypervisor + - Made xen-utils-3.0.postinst more fault-tolerant, so that upgrading + xen2 -> xen3 don''t fail because of a running xen2 hypervisor + - Updated the "Replaces & Conflicts" to a versioned conflict. * Jeremy T. Bouse <jbouse@debian.org> - Renamed xen-hypervisor -> xen-hypervisor-3.0 - Renamed xen-hypervisor-pae -> xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386-pae Modified: trunk/xen-3.0/debian/control =================================================================== --- trunk/xen-3.0/debian/control 2006-0...

...==== --- xen-3/debian/templates/control.source.in (revision 545) +++ xen-3/debian/templates/control.source.in (working copy) @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: extra Maintainer: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> Uploaders: Julien Danjou <acid at debian.org>, Jeremy T. Bouse <jbouse at debian.org>, Guido Trotter <ultrotter at debian.org>, Bastian Blank <waldi at debian.org> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.37.2), python-dev (>= 2.3), libsdl1.2-dev, bcc, lsb-release, python-central (>= 0.5), quilt, zlib1g-dev, libjpeg-dev, libncurses5-dev, l...

Am Freitag, 24. Februar 2006 11:02 schrieb Matthew Grant: > Ralph, Hi Matthew, > I am a Debian Maintainer who is seriously considering getting Xen into > Debian and Ubuntu. > > I have been installing xen-unstable.hg from source on my AMD 64 and have > been impressed with its relative stability. > > I am prepared to sponsor your packages into Debian if we can get them >

Okay... I've added Dominic and Tom to the project since both have requested to help out with the project so hopefully we can bring them both up to speed quickly. I've also modified the user permissions on the project so that DDs are listed as Project Managers and have file release privileges. So Guido, Julien & Bastian let me know if you are still unable to do so. I also

I've kinda been in limbo for awhile, for which I apologize. I've moved cross-country from California back to Georgia. Had a bit of an employment problem last month in that I was let go and found myself looking for a new employer. Thankfully it seems I've had the same good luck Guido had a few months back and found an employer that is a complete Debian house. While they currently

Just a thought I wanted to throw out but having been running Fedora Core on my AMD64 for awhile now and getting to look at their Xen install I've had a few thoughts. Mostly related to installing domU's. FC has a virt-install that is written in python that's in their python-virtinstall package. It's a nice way to install the domU but it only works currently with a FC install.