search for: bitops

...aaf482ab396ff53c2bbf5c35ce237b91c0 [19/20] fs: add libfarstream support config: make ARCH=s390 allmodconfig All error/warnings: In file included from include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:4:0, from arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/byteorder.h:4, from include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h:5, from arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h:829, from include/linux/bitops.h:22, from include/linux/kernel.h:10, from arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h:4, from include/linux/bug.h:4, from include/linux/t...

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming at linux.intel.com> Partially revert "com32: add a centralized bitops header" This reverts part of commit db74cf6c4182f40ecf7fad1f04799d09d82f896d. The usage of the centralized bitops in com32/lib/vsscanf.c is not correct because the bitmap that we're accessing is too large for the 'bt', 'bts' and 'btc' instructions to operate on, i...

Hi, I am trying to build an R package. My existing code makes use of the bitops and chron packages. So I have included statements to import required functionality into the NAMESPACE file using import(). When I run Rcmd build, and error is generated "Error: package 'bitops' does not have a name space" I exclude the import(bitops) statement from the NAMESPACE...

Hi, After the recent r-base and r-base-core alpha releases in sid, some packages fail to load, e.g. r-cran-bitops: R> library(bitops) Error in library(bitops) : package ?bitops? does not have a NAMESPACE and should be re-installed I suppose these errors will get fixed after 2.14.0 is released. In the meantime, should we just downgrade r-base and r-base-core to the testing versions? Cheers, -- Seb

Hi, Andrew - Looks like a recent change you fed to Linus broke the klibc build as of 2.5.71. Can you pass this fix along, please? ===== include/linux/bitops.h 1.4 vs edited ===== --- 1.4/include/linux/bitops.h Thu Jun 5 23:37:30 2003 +++ edited/include/linux/bitops.h Sat Jun 14 22:02:01 2003 @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ return (res & 0x0F) + ((res >> 4) & 0x0F); } -static inline unsigned long generic_hweight64(u64 w) +static i...

1c54d77 (x86: partial unification of asm-x86/bitops.h, 2008-01-30) changed a bunch of btrl/btsl instructions to btr/bts, with the following justification: The inline assembly for the bit operations has been changed to remove explicit sizing hints on the instructions, so the assembler will pick the appropriate instruction forms depending on th...

...64 is going to add another one shortly, so take control now. Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Cc: keir@xen.org Cc: jbeulich@suse.com Cc: tim@xen.org --- xen/arch/arm/arm32/asm-offsets.c | 8 +------- xen/arch/x86/x86_64/asm-offsets.c | 8 +------- xen/include/xen/bitops.h | 7 +++++++ 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/arm32/asm-offsets.c b/xen/arch/arm/arm32/asm-offsets.c index cc1a72a..6d00c86 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/arm32/asm-offsets.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/arm32/asm-offsets.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include <xe...

define sync bitops which is necessary for ia64/xen. Cc: Robin Holt <holt at sgi.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy at goop.org> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata at valinux.co.jp> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck at intel.com> --- include/asm-ia64/sync_bitops.h | 50 ++++++++++...

..., ADDR seems a bit > vague and easily misused. Since I don't see it used anywhere else in > that patch, I will assume it should be tossed, but reserve the right to > rescind this comment later. It's a leftover from i386 version so that I eliminated it. ia64/xen: introduce synch bitops which is necessary for ia64/xen support. Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata at valinux.co.jp> --- include/asm-ia64/sync_bitops.h | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/asm-ia64/sync_bitops.h diff...

As a preparation for removing ext2 non-atomic bit operations from asm/bitops.h. This converts ext2 non-atomic bit operations to little-endian bit operations. Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita at gmail.com> Acked-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker at oracle.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh at suse.com> Cc: ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com --- No change from pr...

Hi folks, Debian 600 64bit desktop > sudo R Password: > install.packages("RBloomberg", repos="http://R-Forge.R-project.org") .... .... * DONE (zoo) ERROR: dependencies ?rcom?, ?bitops?, ?RUnit? are not available for package ?RBloomberg? * removing ?/usr/local/lib/R/site-library/RBloomberg? Failed > install.packages("RBloomberg", "rcom", "bitops", "RUnit", >repos="http://R-Forge.R-project.org") Warning in install.packag...

..., ADDR seems a bit > vague and easily misused. Since I don't see it used anywhere else in > that patch, I will assume it should be tossed, but reserve the right to > rescind this comment later. It's a leftover from i386 version so that I eliminated it. ia64/xen: introduce synch bitops which is necessary for ia64/xen support. Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata at valinux.co.jp> --- include/asm-ia64/sync_bitops.h | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/asm-ia64/sync_bitops.h diff...

...a wiki page that covers the files that are candidates for sharing. I know Jimi has investigated this subject... Please apply. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center Use long instead of int for irq_cpustat_t->__softirq_pending, allowing PowerPC to share this file unchanged (PowerPC bitops operate on longs). Signed-off-by: Jimi Xenidis <jimix@watson.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> diff -r 50778f42f2dd xen/include/asm-x86/hardirq.h --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hardirq.h Wed Mar 29 16:02:40 2006 +0100 +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hardirq.h Wed Mar...

RPM: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.5qa2/ SRC: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.5qa2.tar.gz This release is made off jenkins-release-48 -- Gluster Build System

Hello, I can?t seem to be able to install packages on a redhat-linux-gnu. For instance, this is what happens when I try to install ?bitops?. Any hint on what might be the issue would be much appreciated. > sessionInfo() R version 3.2.3 (2015-12-10) Platform: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu (64-bit) Running under: Red Hat Enterprise Linux > Sys.setenv(https_proxy="https://labproxy.com:8080") > install.packages("bitops...

...er.h:__write_once_size Cyclomatic Complexity 1 arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h:array_index_mask_nospec Cyclomatic Complexity 1 include/linux/kasan-checks.h:kasan_check_read Cyclomatic Complexity 1 include/linux/kasan-checks.h:kasan_check_write Cyclomatic Complexity 2 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:set_bit Cyclomatic Complexity 2 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:clear_bit Cyclomatic Complexity 1 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:test_and_set_bit Cyclomatic Complexity 1 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:constant_test_bit Cyclomatic Complexity 1 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:variable_test_bi...

The src won't compile with gcc 2.96 or 3.23: /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/bitops.h:47: warning: no previous prototype for `gen eric_fls' /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/bitops.h:76: warning: no previous prototype for `get _bitmask_order' Linux/ocfsmain.c:113: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type Linux/ocfsmain.c:1492: conflicting types...

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon at gmail.com> wrote: > 1c54d77 (x86: partial unification of asm-x86/bitops.h, 2008-01-30) > changed a bunch of btrl/btsl instructions to btr/bts, with the following > justification: > > The inline assembly for the bit operations has been changed to remove > explicit sizing hints on the instructions, so the assembler will pick > the appropriate inst...

(resent without HTML) On 07/14/2013 05:56 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > 1c54d77 (x86: partial unification of asm-x86/bitops.h, 2008-01-30) > changed a bunch of btrl/btsl instructions to btr/bts, with the following > justification: > > The inline assembly for the bit operations has been changed to remove > explicit sizing hints on the instructions, so the assembler will pick > the appropriate inst...

...er uses instructions which imply a memory barrier or QDIO which uses atomics. > But I also see a lot of weirdness on this architecture. Mostly historical, s390 actually is one of the easiest architectures in regard to memory barriers. > I found these calls: > > arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h: smp_mb__before_atomic(); > arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h: smp_mb(); > > Not used in arch specific code so this is likely OK. This has been introduced with git commit 5402ea6af11dc5a9, the smp_mb and smp_mb__before_atomic are used in clear_bit_unlock and __clear_bit_unlock which are 1...