search for: belowing

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:24:49AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 04:43:30AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:39:38AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > > klibc mount has only short options thus uses the following syntax > > Frankly, it seems like a klibc problem... well not directly, but right klibc-utils should have

Hi, I tried to enable virtio-blk data plane feature for VMs in my openstack environment, the hypervisor is ubuntu 14.04, libvirt 1.2.2 and QEMU 2.0. As nova doesn't support that parameter yet, I did belows 1. nova boot a VM with raw disk image. 2. nova stop the VM. 3. run "virsh edit <instance-id>" on the hyprvisor node, and adding below into instance xml just before

hi see below's conversation. it seems the e100p card doesn't work with BT. Any idea how this'll work against Telenor (norway)? roy <RoyK> does anyone know if I can trust the E100P to do full PRI stuff in .no? <cypromis> dunno about no <cypromis> I cannot use it in UK <cypromis> cause the framer has problems with system-x switches at bt

belows patch is a first step towards a mntent.h we'll need it anyways later for mdadm support. it allows to compile util-linux-ng mount against klibc. due to the missing features there is a severe size difference: text data bss dec hex filename 1507 0 40 1547 60b /usr/lib/klibc/bin/mount 58526 2544 4552 65622 10056

Hi, Does anyone tried to get ipip or gre tunnel behind NAT environments. ? i''m trying to make both side tunneling with ipip or gre with private address just like belows.. A -------------------FIRWWAL -------------------INET ------------------- B PRIVATE PUBLIC PUBLIC (10.100.0.1) (211.xxx.xxx.xxx) (

Hi, all It seems PPC JIT does not recognize inline assembly. For example, when I give LLVM IR belows to PPC JIT, %0 = tail call i32* asm "", "={r10}"() nounwind ; <i32*> [#uses=1] it complaints that inline assembly is not a supported instruction. x86 JIT works fine, however. Is there a reason that makes PPC JIT not support inline assembly? Currently, we

After upgrading from 1.1.3 to 1.1.4 the imap process crashes as soon as moving a mail to the Trash folder. Belows backtrace points to the expire plugin... Backtrace /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap: Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x2adbeaa8 in expire_mailbox_transaction_commit (t=0x10045248, uid_validity_r=0x7fff77fc, first_saved_uid_r=0x7fff7800,

I do have a bunch of genes ( nearly ~50000) from the whole genome, which read in genomic ranges A range(gene) can be seem as an observation has three columns chromosome, start and end, like that seqnames start end width strand gene1 chr1 1 5 5 + gene2 chr1 10 15 6 + gene3 chr1 12 17 6 + gene4 chr1 20 25 6 + gene5

Hi, all What I want to do is to locate the range of a for-loop statement in a binary. For example, given a for-loop statement belows, for (stat1; stat2; stat3) { /* do something */ } Is it possible to get information about the range (binary address) of the above for-loop, say, 0x0100 - 0x0120. One idea comes up in my mind is adding passes to retrieve such information in LLVM, then use

Hi, all On the dragonedd website, there is a line "It is a reimplementation of llvm-gcc that works with gcc-4.5 or later." I am trying to make gcc-4.6 work woth dragonegg, but I get an error belows, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Compiling cache.c /tmp/chenwj/dragonegg-2.9/cache.c: In function 'llvm_set_cached':

sparc still needs gcc-3.3 for a working run-init. belows makes use of the exported CC var. Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at> diff --git a/scripts/Kbuild.klibc b/scripts/Kbuild.klibc index 66e16e7..70e4071 100644 --- a/scripts/Kbuild.klibc +++ b/scripts/Kbuild.klibc @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ KLIBCROSS := $(CROSS_COMPILE) # binutils KLIBCLD := $(KLIBCROSS)ld

klibc doesn't currently build on s390 since commit 1e8e338325fa0f2bd5c1c800086e900cf188d2cd belows patch adds some kernel ifdef for the newly added section. Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at> --- linux-2.6.15/include/asm-s390/setup.h.orig 2006-02-01 11:27:00.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.15/include/asm-s390/setup.h 2006-02-01 11:31:54.000000000 +0100 @@ -67,6

klibc fails to compile on sparc64 since the kbuild switch: In file included from include/sys/mman.h:11, from klibc/malloc.c:8: linux/include/asm/page.h:18:2: error: #error No page size specified in kernel configuration the current dirty build hack is to define CONFIG_SPARC64_PAGE_SIZE_8KB in the sparc64 MCONFIG. belows patch removes the asm/page.h include. another way to fix

On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:45:51PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: [Received a forward of this mail and I had deleted the original one. So your reply-chain is broken]. > > sparc still needed to build with gcc-3.3 > belows makes use of the exported CC variable. > > also export the binutils for consistency, > added the missing ones too for klcc. > > > diff --git

Hi 陳韋任, > It seems PPC JIT does not recognize inline assembly. > For example, when I give LLVM IR belows to PPC JIT, > > %0 = tail call i32* asm "", "={r10}"() nounwind ;<i32*> [#uses=1] > > it complaints that inline assembly is not a supported > instruction. x86 JIT works fine, however. I'm surprised this worked with the x86 JIT - I

Hi, Very few inline assembly are supported for the X86 backend. As I see from X86ISelLowering.cpp, only bswap, rorw, xchgl and simple register selections (e.g. {=r10}) LLVM JIT can recoginze. But for PPC backend, I am not sure why PPC JIT see all inline assembly IRs as an error. Ding-Yong On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi 陳韋任, > >

Le 21/08/2013 17:36, leroy christophe a ?crit : > > Le 21/08/2013 17:15, maximilian attems a ?crit : >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 01:39:50PM +0200, leroy christophe wrote: >>> Le 21/08/2013 12:20, maximilian attems a ?crit : >>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 07:44:39AM +0200, leroy christophe wrote: >>>>> Find attached two patches I have in order to build

Hi Kashyap, Here I want to test and see how much I/O performance could be improved by virtio-blk data plane feature. Yes, this is a dirty way to enable it :-), You mentioned using newer libvirt, is there parameter similar "x-data-plane=on" in new version libvirt? Please let know me you if you have better solution. Regards, CY. On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy

Hi, trying to develop this idea of splitting c++ classes into real interface and implementation and to make a std isocpp proposal out of it. Need some help and info to make the proposal cover as many details as possible. The idea is to split the class declaration into a part that will stay in the header and will contain only the public members. (let's ignore protected for the moment). The

I just tried to go from CAS to PRI on my T1 (Sangoma), and failed pretty badly. Seemingly everything worked -- Asterisk would see the incoming call (including CID and DID info), try to route it, and fail -- giving me a telco (not Asterisk) call failure message. My zapata.conf and zaptel.conf files are at http://pastebin.com/558349 Below's the log dump. Note that, because I was simply going