search for: beagled

Hi Charles, Thanks so much for your quick and detailed reply! I've added my answers and details inline. On 22.1.2015 04:46, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jan 21, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Sebastian Hosche <sebastian.hosche at web.de> > wrote: > >> First issue: whatever I set as the offdelay, seems to be ignored and >> the UPS just cuts the power about 2sec after receiving

On Jan 22, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Sebastian Hosche <sebastian.hosche at web.de> wrote: > Hi Charles, > > Thanks so much for your quick and detailed reply! I've added my answers and details inline. Sorry this reply wasn't as quick. > On 22.1.2015 04:46, Charles Lepple wrote: >> On Jan 21, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Sebastian Hosche <sebastian.hosche at web.de> wrote:

Hi, there was a message in the list at Fri 26 Oct 2007 21:13:58, that beagle was added to centos testing repo. But I could not find it there. Please could someone give me an advice. Thank's a lot! "We have added beagle-0.2.18, tomboy-0.8.1, and mono-1.2.4 to the CentOS-5 testing repo for both x86_64 and i386." Are there any experiences with beagle under centos 5? Is it usable now

...m a web front end. Beagle would be ideal. Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending upon your viewpoint), mono, and mono apps, will likely never see the light of day in RHEL. I'm looking for the most straightforward way to get beagle installed. I don't need the gnome gui, just beaglelib, beagled, and beagle-query. rpmforge has an old version of mono (1.0.6). But no beagle. I could try with the FC6 SRPMS, but something tells me I'd run into problems, so I figured I'd ask here first. Thanks

On Jan 21, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Sebastian Hosche <sebastian.hosche at web.de> wrote: > Hi there, > > I just purchased a CyberPower BR850ELCD and while setting NUT up with the install instructions from the homepage was pretty straightforward, and the UPS was detected by the usbhid-ups driver, I'm having problems getting the UPS to work properly. > > First issue: whatever I

Hi Folks Can anyone help me with the following error - is it serious; is the file transferred; are the other files transferred? [morgan@morgansmachine ~]$ rsync -a -X -A -z -v /home/morgan/Documents 192.168.1.30:/home/morgan/Documents morgan@192.168.1.30's password: building file list ... done rsync: rsync_xal_set:

We have added beagle-0.2.18, tomboy-0.8.1, and mono-1.2.4 to the CentOS-5 testing repo for both x86_64 and i386. Please see this link for how to use the testing repo: http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories/ Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital

Hi Folks, is there someone who has desktop-search-engine Beagle installed on CentOS 4.4? If so - can you give me some hints (links, howtos)? Thx Timothy

Hi Renato, > > Sorry but the goal of Debian porterboxes is not for upstream testing > > their software but for packaging purposes. > > > > You should instead have a look to the GCC compilation farm: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm > > Some LLVM developers are using these servers for testing LLVM and > > Dragonegg. > > > > Hi Folks,

Hi there, I just purchased a CyberPower BR850ELCD and while setting NUT up with the install instructions from the homepage was pretty straightforward, and the UPS was detected by the usbhid-ups driver, I'm having problems getting the UPS to work properly. First issue: whatever I set as the offdelay, seems to be ignored and the UPS just cuts the power about 2sec after receiving the

Just wondering, what exactly is supported/suggested: I need a comprehensive desktop search functionality. Not only searching for file names but also for content and meta data. The environment is EL6.8 / Gnome2. I have noticed that "beagle" is not part of the distro anymore. Any suggestions for such requirement? Thanks! LF

Renato, >> cortex-a9 sounds fine. It'd be cool if we verified those binaries >> run on a cortex-a8 and a cortex-a15, too. It'd be very, very strange >> if they didn't, but hey, catching very, very strange problems is what >> release testing is for, right? :) > Actually, this is a good idea, I'll set up a Beagle as a buildbot and see > what happens to

On 24 April 2013 12:01, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org> wrote: > Sorry but the goal of Debian porterboxes is not for upstream testing > their software but for packaging purposes. > > You should instead have a look to the GCC compilation farm: > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm > Some LLVM developers are using these servers for testing LLVM and > Dragonegg.

Hello everyone, >AFAIR, there were several beagles in LLVM Lab. You might want to check with Galina about how live they are. Yes, we have couple beagleboards. I can make them available if this will add value. Maybe we should set a special "release" buildmaster? Which would orchestrate slow bootstrapped builds with extensive testing and collect binaries. This lets us unify the way

According to the CRAN contributed packages page, the license for "KernSmooth" is *not* GPL. It is listed as "License: Unlimited distribution (from Dr Wand)." Are there any restrictions on this of any kind? Is there some written license document similar to the GPL license? The reason I'm asking is that the legal beagles in the company I work for are extremely paranoid about

On 24/04/2013 12:53, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) wrote: > Hi Sylvestre, > >>> Thanks for the info. I just contacted DSA (Debian System Admin, I >>> guess), and he said we have to prepare information list on [1] and >>> ask DD to approve it. Are you a DD, or Sylvestre is? >> I am (cf my email address). >> Why would like to do in this context ? > >

Hi Folks I've gone back over the list and the only reference I've found to "Invalid argument (22)" is here: http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2006-May/015478.html That seems a different context of character set mismatches. The common parts to my errors are: rsync: rsync_xal_set: lsetxattr("...","security.selinux") failed: Invalid argument (22) And:

There are a number of good authentication frameworks for rails - has anyone developed a generic authorization framework? I''m thinking of something that included the concept of roles, mapped roles to both actions and users and could be used to wrap actions before their invocation. Extra good would be some way to check data permissions (as in, "yes you can perform the ''Edit

This is incredibly basic, but... I have a form that has fields defined for password and password_confirmation. it is passing in the following data Parameters: {"commit"=>"Change Password", "admin"=>{"password_confirmation"=>"beagle", "password"=>"beagle"}, "id"=>"3" I thought that

I've got about 10,000 docs I'd like to devise a search/index for. I found a perl script called Perlfect that can do that on an old P3 but at the astronomical time of 7 hours. Another script(cgi/perl) at hotscripts can do the same but allows the "rm -rf /" exploit. DoH!? Is there anything perl/flatfile that can search/index faster? This is a nice job for an aging P3 in the