llvm dev - Apr 2013 - [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Announcement] 3.3 Release Planning!

On 24/04/2013 12:53, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) wrote:
> Hi Sylvestre,
> 
>>>   Thanks for the info. I just contacted DSA (Debian System Admin, I
>>> guess), and he said we have to prepare information list on [1] and
>>> ask DD to approve it. Are you a DD, or Sylvestre is?
>> I am (cf my email address).
>> Why would like to do in this context ?
> 
>   Well, not everyone has a ARM machine to help ARM testing. That's why
> Mehmet mentioned Debian has resource.
Sorry but the goal of Debian porterboxes is not for upstream testing
their software but for packaging purposes.

You should instead have a look to the GCC compilation farm:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm
Some LLVM developers are using these servers for testing LLVM and Dragonegg.

Sylvestre

On 24 April 2013 12:01, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org> wrote:
> Sorry but the goal of Debian porterboxes is not for upstream testing
> their software but for packaging purposes.
>
> You should instead have a look to the GCC compilation farm:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm
> Some LLVM developers are using these servers for testing LLVM and
> Dragonegg.
>
Hi Folks,

I'm separating some of our boards for release testing. What kind of
hardware do you need and how many of each? I'm not promising anything, but
I already have a Beagle and a Panda just for the release, and am setting
them up as we speak. I may be able to get a quad-core A9 for test-suite
runs, will know later this week.

Unfortunately, I only have one A15 (the test-suite buildbot), so if we want
to use that as well we'll have to stop the bot.

If you have any requirement for testing and building the binaries for this
release, let me know and we can work out a solution.

thanks,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130424/437bab37/attachment.html>

Hi Renato,
> > Sorry but the goal of Debian porterboxes is not for upstream testing
> > their software but for packaging purposes.
> >
> > You should instead have a look to the GCC compilation farm:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm
> > Some LLVM developers are using these servers for testing LLVM and
> > Dragonegg.
> >
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> I'm separating some of our boards for release testing. What kind of
> hardware do you need and how many of each? I'm not promising anything,
but
> I already have a Beagle and a Panda just for the release, and am setting
> them up as we speak. I may be able to get a quad-core A9 for test-suite
> runs, will know later this week.
> 
> Unfortunately, I only have one A15 (the test-suite buildbot), so if we want
> to use that as well we'll have to stop the bot.
> 
> If you have any requirement for testing and building the binaries for this
> release, let me know and we can work out a solution.
  Nothing special so far. From my experience, Panda would be good for
testing, but I don't know how good Beagle is (how much time it takes
for compilation and testing run?). I would like to have multiple Panda
if possible (not one Beagle, and one Panda). IMO, that makes testing
enviroment simpler.

Regards,
chenwj

-- 
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj