search for: bcc'd

Hello everyone, Please let me know if you'd like to help providing binaries and testing for your favourite platform. If you were a tester on the previous release, I've bcc'd you on this email. I propose this schedule for the 3.7 release: - 14 July 2015: Create the release branch. - 14 July -- 21 July: Testing Phase I. RC1 binaries are built and tested. - 22 July -- 29 July: Fix bugs from Testing Phase I. All new features for the release should be complete. In...

Yesterday a user reported to me that she received a bunch of emails that were not addressed to her. I'm using dovecot version 0.99.11 along with postfix and amavisd-new. I don't know how this happened because each mail file in /var/mail/ is only readable by the user. Has anyone ever heard of this happening before?

...that happens. Anyone know where those are coming from? Maybe it's people using Herald to subscribe to changes in particular parts of the codebase - so when someone starts a code review all the Herald subscribers end up cc'd on the initial mail? I wonder if the Herald subscribers should be bcc'd or handled in some other way? If that's what's happening, and it's the right way to do it, I'm not sure what the right limit is - as more people use Herald we could get larger and larger CC lists. What's the mailing list limit for? What're the tradeoffs of setting it...

(This is bcc'd to a list of people who have had problems with rgl lately or who are known to be big users; not cc'd, so you don't all get cc'd all the responses on the R-devel list). I've just put together a test build of rgl, and put it on my web site as http://www.stats.uwo.ca/faculty/...

...Stellard >> Subject: LLVM 3.7 release plan and call for testers >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> Please let me know if you'd like to help providing binaries and >> testing for your favourite platform. If you were a tester on the >> previous release, I've bcc'd you on this email. >> >> I propose this schedule for the 3.7 release: >> >> - 14 July 2015: Create the release branch. >> >> - 14 July -- 21 July: Testing Phase I. RC1 binaries are built and tested. >> >> - 22 July -- 29 July: Fix bugs from Test...

Bcc'd to everyone who have sent me patches to dovecot-auth or related code. Once in a while people ask me if Dovecot's authentication server code could be relicensed to BSD so they could use it for their project. Usually they have been other BSD-licensed open source projects which just prefer...

...he limit :) > > > Maybe it's people using Herald to subscribe to changes in particular > > parts of the codebase - so when someone starts a code review all the > > Herald subscribers end up cc'd on the initial mail? I wonder if the > > Herald subscribers should be bcc'd or handled in some other way? > > > > If that's what's happening, and it's the right way to do it, I'm not > > sure what the right limit is - as more people use Herald we could get > > larger and larger CC lists. > > > > What's the maili...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2/24/2014 3:58 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: >> I would add a BCC recipient in the MTA. It's more save in such situation. >> See the thread about qmail and multiple recipients for one mail address. > > The only downside to this is all of the original headers are *not* preserved > in the BCC copy. Er, I don't know what you mean with &quo...

...to the 3.7 branch. If you don't want to do that, just email me some text, and I'll happily land it for you. If you're uncertain whether your work is in the release or not, 3.7 covers commits r225992-r242221. Other updates to the docs are also very welcome. Thanks, Hans (You're bcc'd on this email if you're mentioned in this list.) Lang: can you write something about the new ORC JIT interface? Reid: how far did SEH support get in 3.7? Is this something we should mention? I'll add something about the switch lowering changes. Chandler: can you write something ab...

Thibault, It would be nice if LiblineaR() accepted data in the form of a sparse matrix (it does not accept whatever e1071::read.matrix.csr returns). It would also be nice if there were functions to read/write files in the native liblinear file format; I am sure the original liblinear library provides at least the input code. Thanks! -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 12.04

...ot the same one you used in this email. At least one of the people who can deal with this kind of thing would now demand an apology from you before ever reading your email again. I won't do that, but I have to admit, I don't like the fact that you wasted 10 minutes of my time. I'm Bcc'ing a couple of people who are working on putting together a better interface to the bug reporting system, so they know to deal with this kind of issue as well as all the others. I'm not hostile, I just sound that way, because I've wasted a lot of time this week on issues like this...

...mail. At least one of the people who can deal with this kind of thing > >>would now demand an apology from you before ever reading your email again. > >>I won't do that, but I have to admit, I don't like the fact that you wasted > >>10 minutes of my time. I'm Bcc'ing a couple of people who are working on > >>putting together a better interface to the bug reporting system, so they > >>know to deal with this kind of issue as well as all the others. > >> > >>I'm not hostile, I just sound that way, because I've wa...

On 11 September 2014 16:09, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> wrote: > This patch adds the header file with structs and defines for > the virtio based gpu device. Covers 2d operations only. Please don't cc subscriber only mailing lists (virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org) on posts to qemu-devel; it just means everybody responding gets mailer bounce junkmail. thanks -- PMM

On 11 September 2014 16:09, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> wrote: > This patch adds the header file with structs and defines for > the virtio based gpu device. Covers 2d operations only. Please don't cc subscriber only mailing lists (virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org) on posts to qemu-devel; it just means everybody responding gets mailer bounce junkmail. thanks -- PMM

...people who can deal with this kind of thing > >>>> would now demand an apology from you before ever reading your email again. > >>>> I won't do that, but I have to admit, I don't like the fact that you wasted > >>>> 10 minutes of my time. I'm Bcc'ing a couple of people who are working on > >>>> putting together a better interface to the bug reporting system, so they > >>>> know to deal with this kind of issue as well as all the others. > >>>> > >>>> I'm not hostile, I just...

...fh-brs.de> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Charles Marcus wrote: >> >>> On 2/24/2014 3:58 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> >>> wrote: >>>> I would add a BCC recipient in the MTA. It's more save in such situation. >>>> See the thread about qmail and multiple recipients for one mail address. >>> >>> The only downside to this is all of the original headers are *not* >>> preserved in the BCC copy. >> &g...

Hello All, I am in the United States where we have e-discovery rules. Some organizations have to retain data for a certain amount of time, others are required to have a data retention policy. This means that while it should probably be possible for a user to "delete" an email so they do not see it. The server needs to store it, possibly in a tree that mirrors the folder setup of

...ast one of the people who can deal with this kind of thing >>>> would now demand an apology from you before ever reading your email again. >>>> I won't do that, but I have to admit, I don't like the fact that you wasted >>>> 10 minutes of my time. I'm Bcc'ing a couple of people who are working on >>>> putting together a better interface to the bug reporting system, so they >>>> know to deal with this kind of issue as well as all the others. >>>> >>>> I'm not hostile, I just sound that way, bec...

...SH 3.3 right away. > On OpenBSD privsep works flawlessly, and I have reports that is also > true on NetBSD. All other systems appear to have minor or major > weaknesses when this code is running. > > (securityfocus postmaster; please post this through immediately, since > i have bcc'd over 30 other places..)

...SH 3.3 right away. > On OpenBSD privsep works flawlessly, and I have reports that is also > true on NetBSD. All other systems appear to have minor or major > weaknesses when this code is running. > > (securityfocus postmaster; please post this through immediately, since > i have bcc'd over 30 other places..)