search for: b410

Dear all, I know this is more a Digium hardware than an Asterisk issue. Already posted a question at Digium, however also like to see whether anyone in the Asterisk community has encountered the following situation: I installed a Digium B410P BRI PCI card on my new asterisk server, following the steps specified in the manual. I can see the PCI card is available using the lspci command: ... 04:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network Connection [8086:10d3] 05:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corpo...

Hi everybody, In an Asterisk 1.6.0.5, dahdi-linux-2.1.0.4, dahdi-tools-2.1.0.2, with a Digium B410P and an OpenVox A400E, I can't make "dahdi_scan" to recognize the OpenVox. This card was working correctly but suddenly stopped working and I cannot make it work again. Both ?lspci? and ?dahdi_hardware? detect it but ?dahdi_scan? not and I cannot use it. >lsppci: *0a:00.0 Netwo...

Hello, Does anyone could tell me how can I use pciback under Ubuntu ? I''ve got a telephony card for Asterisk and I find this document : http://www.crc.id.au/fedora-core-6-xen-and-asterisk/ What happens seems that pciback module is unavailable under Ubuntu or compiled into the kernel ? Any tips are welcome Regards _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing

Hi, I'm using revision 6822 of Dahdi Tools. # dahdi_hardware pci:0000:05:06.0 wcb4xxp+ d161:b410 Digium Wildcard B410P # asterisk -rx "dahdi show version" DAHDI Version: 2.2.0.2 Echo Canceller: OSLEC # cat /etc/dahdi/genconf_parameters ... pri_termtype SPAN/1 TE SPAN/2 TE SPAN/3 NT SPAN/4 NT # dahdi_genconf syste...

Hi everybody, I have a 1.6.0.5 asterisk system and I?m having many problems with my pstn cards. This system has a Digium B410P with 4 BRIs configured, and an OpenVox A400E. The issue is that it?s impossible to make the system recognize the A400E, despite the ?lspci? output is: 0a:00.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface 11:00.0 ISDN controller: Digium, Inc. Wildcard B410 quad-BRI...

Hi, My asterisk server was working with a 4-FXO analog card (TDM400P). I recently added two digital cards: a TE120P (1 PRI) and a B410P (4 BRI). The B410P is still unconfigured but inserted in a PCI slot. The TE120P's jumper is set to E1 as it will connect to a commercial PBX's PRI card also configured as E1. My analog channels used to be 1-4 but since I added the new cards I changed them to 101-104. As I try to initia...

Hi, Is it possible to both use Digium B410P and bristuff'ed 1.4 Asterisk, now ? I've heard BRI support in Asterisk is about to change with 1.6 but I'm not sure I understood what the plan is. If someone has a clue, l would delighted to learn about it. Cheers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbe...

Yesterday, a low-duty production server that I maintain core-dumped. At the time there were only around 2 calls going through it. The strace on the screen made it look like it was caused by Dahdi. The machine is running asterisk-1.6.0.3 dahdi-linux-2.1.0.3 dahdi-tools-2.1.0.2 asterisk-addons-1.6.0 Kernel version 2.6.28 There is a genuine TDM400P (populated witrh 2xFXO cards and 2xFXS cards.

Hi, I'm experiencing some strange problems with out Digium card. First the details abount hardware and software: Digium, Inc. Wildcard B410 quad-BRI card (rev 01) Asterisk 1.6.0.20 dahdi-linux-complete-2.2.1-rc2+2.2.1-rc2 libpri-1.4.10.2.tar.gz The problem now is that there are a number of clients that I call and suddenly the connection drops. Just a few seconds later the clients calls me, and tells me that he has accepted the call...

Hi, on one of our clients asterisk server we have the problem that you hear nothing on external calls. Here are the details abount the system: Asterisk 1.6.0.22 DIGIUM Wildcard B410 quad-BRI card (rev 01) dahdi-linux-complete-2.2.0+2.2.0 I have setup the following test extension: exten => 9216992,1,ANSWER() exten => 9216992,2,WAIT(2) exten => 9216992,3,RECORD(input:gsm,5,30) exten => 9216992,4,WAIT(1) exten => 92169...

...N/A N/A Y 25561 Task Status of Volume gv01 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ There are no active volume tasks [root at nfs01 /]# [root at nfs01 /]# gluster volume info Volume Name: gv01 Type: Replicate Volume ID: e5ccc75e-5192-45ac-b410-a34ebd777666 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: nfs01:/bricks/0/gv01 Brick2: nfs02:/bricks/0/gv01 Options Reconfigured: transport.address-family: inet nfs.disable: on performance.client-io-threads: off nfs.trusted-sync: on performance.c...

...gv01 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > There are no active volume tasks > > [root at nfs01 /]# > > > [root at nfs01 /]# gluster volume info > > Volume Name: gv01 > Type: Replicate > Volume ID: e5ccc75e-5192-45ac-b410-a34ebd777666 > Status: Started > Snapshot Count: 0 > Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 > Transport-type: tcp > Bricks: > Brick1: nfs01:/bricks/0/gv01 > Brick2: nfs02:/bricks/0/gv01 > Options Reconfigured: > transport.address-family: inet > nfs.disable: on > performance.cl...

Hi, folks: I remain intrigued by the gap in BRI implementation between North America and Europe, and I wanted to get feedback from the list members on the matter. I'm seriously considering making the leap in our office. In Europe, the idea that an office that does not have enough lines to justify PRI would use analog lines is perceived as technologically backwards, and yet that's what

...in 5771692+0 records out 2955106304 bytes (3.0 GB) copied, 35.3425 s, 83.6 MB/s [root at nfs01 gv01]# pwd /bricks/0/gv01 [root at nfs01 gv01]# Tried a few tweak options with no effect: [root at nfs01 glusterfs]# gluster volume info Volume Name: gv01 Type: Replicate Volume ID: e5ccc75e-5192-45ac-b410-a34ebd777666 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: nfs01:/bricks/0/gv01 Brick2: nfs02:/bricks/0/gv01 Options Reconfigured: cluster.server-quorum-type: server cluster.quorum-type: auto server.event-threads: 8 client.event-threads: 8 perform...

...------------------------------------------------------------------ > There are no active volume tasks > > [root at nfs01 /]# > > > [root at nfs01 /]# gluster volume info > > Volume Name: gv01 > Type: Replicate > Volume ID: e5ccc75e-5192-45ac-b410-a34ebd777666 > Status: Started > Snapshot Count: 0 > Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 > Transport-type: tcp > Bricks: > Brick1: nfs01:/bricks/0/gv01 > Brick2: nfs02:/bricks/0/gv01 > Options Reconfigured: > transport.address-family: inet >...

...type fuse.glusterfs (rw,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,default_permissions,allow_other,max_read=131072) Gluster always reports as working no matter when I type the below two commands: [root at nfs01 glusterfs]# gluster volume info Volume Name: gv01 Type: Replicate Volume ID: e5ccc75e-5192-45ac-b410-a34ebd777666 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: nfs01:/bricks/0/gv01 Brick2: nfs02:/bricks/0/gv01 Options Reconfigured: cluster.server-quorum-type: none cluster.quorum-type: none server.event-threads: 8 client.event-threads: 8 performan...

...-- >> ------------------ >> There are no active volume tasks >> >> [root at nfs01 /]# >> >> >> [root at nfs01 /]# gluster volume info >> >> Volume Name: gv01 >> Type: Replicate >> Volume ID: e5ccc75e-5192-45ac-b410-a34ebd777666 >> Status: Started >> Snapshot Count: 0 >> Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 >> Transport-type: tcp >> Bricks: >> Brick1: nfs01:/bricks/0/gv01 >> Brick2: nfs02:/bricks/0/gv01 >> Options Reconfigured: >>...

...d=0,default_permissions,allow_other,max_read=131072) > > > Gluster always reports as working no matter when I type the below two > commands: > > [root at nfs01 glusterfs]# gluster volume info > > Volume Name: gv01 > Type: Replicate > Volume ID: e5ccc75e-5192-45ac-b410-a34ebd777666 > Status: Started > Snapshot Count: 0 > Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 > Transport-type: tcp > Bricks: > Brick1: nfs01:/bricks/0/gv01 > Brick2: nfs02:/bricks/0/gv01 > Options Reconfigured: > cluster.server-quorum-type: none > cluster.quorum-type: none > se...

Hi, As I posted in my previous emails - glusterfs can never match NFS (especially async one) performance of small files/latency. That's given by the design. Nothing you can do about it. Ondrej -----Original Message----- From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Rik Theys Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 10:38 AM To: gluster-users at

Hello List, I have found that asterisk supports only forwards in-dialog MESSAGE method. That is, if the MESSAGE method is sent within an active call. But according our requirement we need to send MESSAGE method to the other leg without being in a call (general stateless proxy forward). Is it possible to do this in asterisk using some tricks? Regards, Rajib Deka SIEMENS Ltd. Robert V Chandran