search for: axwalk

...viewvc/pkg-llvm/llvm-toolchain/branches/3.8/debian/control?revision=1881&view=markup . 3) update the "rules" script as necessary to support the above, copying files into the places that the Debian package layout expects HTH, Andrew > 2016-04-12 17:56 GMT-07:00 Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com>: > >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 08:10 Amaury SECHET via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> I'd like to shime in here. These apt repository used to contain packages >>> named llvm-3.8-tools containing, amongst other...

On Sun, 1 May 2016 at 16:12 Amaury SECHET <deadalnix at gmail.com> wrote: > Some update on this. > > 2016-04-12 18:48 GMT-07:00 Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com>: > >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 09:38 Amaury SECHET <deadalnix at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I'd be happy to do it, but this is a bit much high level for me to be >>> actionable. Can you explain me what I should do to reintroduce them int he &g...

That did it, thanks for the help! For the future is there a set of documentation for these bindings, or their equivalent c functions? I tried looking but was having trouble finding anything that seemed to match. On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:35 AM Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 at 00:32 Brian Picciano via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> I have the following code to generate a really basic IR: >> http://gobin.io/LtdJ >> >> And the output I get from it is: http://gobin...

Thanks - I'll try this tonight. Assuming it works, should these variables be added to the docs at http://llvm.org/docs/CMake.html ? On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 at 11:02 David Jones via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Now that autoconf is going away soon, I figured I'd try building using >> CMake. >> >> I checked out llvm, cfe and lldb f...

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:02 AM Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jul 2015 at 01:43 Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:27 PM Jonathan Roelofs < >> jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: >> >>> Even further off topic, in phab wishlist land: It'...

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 08:10 Amaury SECHET via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I'd like to shime in here. These apt repository used to contain packages > named llvm-3.8-tools containing, amongst other things, the lit python > library used to test llvm. It seems that it went away recently and I have > travis build failing because of this. > > What is

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm working on an LLVM-based Go compiler as a hobby project. I'm using Go > bindings to the LLVM C API, and have found that the latter does not have > full support for named metadata, which means I can't (easily/sensibly) > expo...

Hi Andrew, Peter, I took a look at the results of running govet on the go bindings - there are a lot of small/simple problems that should probably be looked at. Wrong number of arguments a few times, shifts by > 32, etc. https://golang.org/cmd/vet/ Thanks! -eric -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 at 05:55 Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Andrew, Peter, > > I took a look at the results of running govet on the go bindings - there > are a lot of small/simple problems that should probably be looked at. Wrong > number of arguments a few times, shifts by > 32, etc. > Did you just run "go vet

On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 at 00:32 Brian Picciano via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I have the following code to generate a really basic IR: > http://gobin.io/LtdJ > > And the output I get from it is: http://gobin.io/XgkH > > That IR code which is dumped seems to work fine if I do llc then gcc on > it, so I'm not sure why it won't work through the

...tly fairly thin-spread; would you be able to contribute to this > effort? > Sounds good. My time is likewise thinly spread, but I'll be happy to contribute to the effort when I can. Cheers, Andrew > Thanks, > Stephen > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 at 06:02 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> > From: "Stephen Cross" <scross at scross.co.uk> > >> > To: "Reid Kleckner" &lt...

I have the following code to generate a really basic IR: http://gobin.io/LtdJ And the output I get from it is: http://gobin.io/XgkH That IR code which is dumped seems to work fine if I do llc then gcc on it, so I'm not sure why it won't work through the engine. This is my first time using LLVM so I'm pretty new with all of it, any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! - Brian

Hi folks, I'm working on an LLVM-based Go compiler as a hobby project. I'm using Go bindings to the LLVM C API, and have found that the latter does not have full support for named metadata, which means I can't (easily/sensibly) export debug information. Namely, you can't create or update named metadata. I sent a patch to the llvm-commits list last weekend, but haven't had any

...the review (e.g.: > http://reviews.llvm.org/D11016). Can you check it out what is causing > this issue? > > Thanks, > Tamas > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:50 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:02 AM Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 3 Jul 2015 at 01:43 Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:27 PM Jonathan Roelofs < >>>> jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>&g...

Now that autoconf is going away soon, I figured I'd try building using CMake. I checked out llvm, cfe and lldb from the SVN server, and followed the basic build instructions. cmake -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/tools/llvm/svn_head -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86;CppBackend" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON ../llvm Everything worked well, and in

On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 at 06:02 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Stephen Cross" <scross at scross.co.uk> > > To: "Reid Kleckner" <rnk at google.com> > > Cc: "Clang Developers List" <cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "LLVM Developers > Mailing List" <llvmdev at

All, The following websites will be moving to a new web server in the next few days: clang.llvm.org <http://clang.llvm.org/> clang-analyzer.llvm.org <http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/> compiler-rt.llvm.org <http://compiler-rt.llvm.org/> dragonegg.llvm.org <http://dragonegg.llvm.org/> klee.llvm.org <http://klee.llvm.org/> libclc.llvm.org <http://libclc.llvm.org/>

Hi LLVMDev, There’s been a good bit of progress this month, and with the dev meeting later this week I thought I’d send out a second update. There are only two outstanding blocking issues that don’t have patches proposed, PR 21568 & PR 23947. I would greatly appreciate if someone who works on Mips would take a look at PR 23947. The following issues have been marked as fixed since the last

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:27 PM Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: > Even further off topic, in phab wishlist land: It'd be awesome if it > were capable of inferring extended patch context by looking at the svn > repo/git mirrors (rather than requiring the person submitting the patch > to re-upload with -U999). > Yea, this is hard, because detecting

Done thusly: echristo at athyra ~/r/llvm-project> git push To github.com:llvm/llvm-project.git 936d1427da1..372bfc65deb master -> master On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:02 AM Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > OK. I'll get it. > > -eric > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:58 AM Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> > wrote: > >> Sure,