search for: awesomeness

Hello, I have an account (called awesome) that does not have access to some public shared folders. I can use this account from Mozilla Thunderbird, but I cannot use it from Outlook. I opened /var/log/maillog. When I try to list all folders, I get this in the log: Dec 28 09:57:38 designaproduct dovecot: IMAP(awesome): opendir(/var/mail/public) failed: Permission denied However, outlook

Dear all, Lets say I have the following: > x <- c("Eve: Going to try something new today...", "Adam: Hey @Eve, how are you finding R? #rstats", "Eve: @Adam, It's awesome, so much better at statistics that #Excel ever was! @Cain & @Able disagree though :(", "Adam: @Eve I'm sure they'll sort it out :)", "blahblah") > x [1]

Hello, If you weren''t at PuppetConf or didn''t catch my talk, here''s a quick recap. I''m product owner for the Puppet Forge team which formed in July with 2 awesome engineers and an equally awesome designer. We''re a team dedicated to the Forge and while ramping up, we''ve shipped three small improvements to the Forge that we hope you enjoy. *

I''m pretty much done with a project I''ve been developing to learn Rails, http://www.happycarpools.com . If you could take a look, that''d be awesome! Feedback would be even more awesome! Probably the coolest thing about making this has been seeing how Rails does *so much* and hardly has any superfluous parts, if any. There are so many features that I initially

I''m going through Peepcode''s Rspec Basics for an overview. He''s just doing a simple spec: class PeepCode end describe PeepCode do it "should be awsome" do end end So running spec spec/simple_spec.rb should produce according to his screen cast: 1 example, 0 failures, 1 not implemented but I only recieve: 1 example, 0 failures Also spec

Hi, I am very excited to take the awesome tutorial of implementing *Kaleidoscope*. But I got stuck here... I have done the AST parsing, however, when I introduce these 'llvm/IR/*' headers, I got a compiling error... But if I delete these headers it runs well ... """headers #include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h" #include "llvm/IR/Constants.h" #include

Hello everyone, I am able to work very well with annotations in C/C++, by using __attribute__((annotate("MYANNOTATION"))) static int a; . Inside the LLVM bytecode I have @llvm.global.annotations and @llvm.var.annotation. However, I was trying to test annotations also in Java, with VMKit. These are the commands that I run: javac -Xlint -g -O Main.java ../Release+Asserts/bin/vmjc Main

to list as well! ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> Date: 2009/2/2 Subject: Re: Simple but awesome demos of Wine? To: Brian Vincent <brian.vincent at gmail.com> 2009/2/2 Brian Vincent <brian.vincent at gmail.com>: > 6. You might want to consider showing off Google's Picasa and it's custom > Wine implementation. I

...children). When I run the following test, it gives me an error: --------------------------------- # test with a valid message def test_valid_message_new thread = MessageThread.new :title => ''awesome thread'' message = thread.messages.build(:body =>''total awesomeness'') assert thread.valid?, ''thread not valid'' assert (thread.messages.size == 1) assert_equal ''total awesomeness'', message.body assert !thread.messages[0].nil? #line 182, and the line below, line 183 assert thread.messages.find(:first...

Hello Harris, Thank you for your answer. So it is there a way of annotating variables in Java Code, so I can see them into LLVM bytecode? Thank you ! On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Harris BAKIRAS <h.bakiras at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Alexandru, > > No you did nothing wrong. > > We are using our own data structure to describe annotations in J3. So it > is normal

On 02.01.2013, at 19:51, Eli Bendersky wrote: >> I compiled parts of LLVM to JavaScript using emscripten and made a demo of parsing and executing LLVM assembly, >> >> http://kripken.github.com/llvm.js/demo.html >> >> Basically you enter some LLVM IR, press a button and see the output of compiling and running it, directly in the browser. >> >> This was

Hi, I am using Dovecot 2.2.11 with Pigeonhole on Arch Linux. I have a partly working sieve script (pasted to the end of this mail) which sorts mail into various imap folders. The first, third and fourth if blocks work just fine. The second and fifth block do not sort any mails. However, if I apply the script with sieve-test to mails the second and fifth block seem to work. How is the manual

I''m a slow learner when it come to shortcuts and i got real tired looking up Textmate''s Rails snippets & commands in the context menu. So i fired up trusty OmniGraffle and quickly created a little Cheat Sheet for all default snippets/macros/commands in Textmate''s current Rails Bundle. Certainly helped me to remember these quickly. So, if you''re

1. Whenever you ask BackgrounDRb to perform a particular task using: MiddleMan.ask_work(:worker => :rss_worker,:worker_method => :fetch_url, :data => "www.google.com") Your task would be performed then and there. But, if your worker is busy, task won''t be queued, except in socket buffer. And your request may get lost. This isn''t generally a problem

Hi Matt, Any decent quad, quad-core Opteron system should be able to handle it with ease! :) -- Regards, Hilton Travis Phone: +61 (0)7 3344 3889 (Brisbane, Australia) Phone: +61 (0)419 792 394 Manager, Quark IT http://www.quarkit.com.au Quark AudioVisual http://www.quarkav.net http://www.threatcode.com/

hello guys, I have following structure of the table, where I store items of tree: | id | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | user_id | int(11) | YES | | NULL | | | parent_id | int(11) | YES | | NULL | | | lft | int(11) | YES | | NULL | | | rgt | int(11) | YES

Hey guys, Filepicker just released some of their rails libraries for user content handling. https://github.com/Filepicker/filepicker-rails Definitely worth checking out. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590599780/ This looks awesome! Any ETA? Best, Adam

hi, Here is wishing everyone in the CentOS community a great holiday season, awesome new year and a great 2014. May 2014 bring friendlier + larger communities, stabler distros and a general reduction in systems frustrations for the users! regards from and to everyone, - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key :

Hello Alexandru, No you did nothing wrong. We are using our own data structure to describe annotations in J3. So it is normal that you can not see your Java annotations inside the LLVM bytecode produced. If I remember well, our implementation of annotations do not rely on LLVM annotations. Regards, Harris Bakiras On 06/17/2013 02:19 PM, Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu wrote: > Hello