asterisk users - Apr 2006 - WOW! Sphinx is awesome... but....(asterisk+sphinx+menus)

Hi Matt,

Any decent quad, quad-core Opteron system should be able to handle it
with ease!  :)

--

Regards,

Hilton Travis                          Phone: +61 (0)7 3344 3889
(Brisbane, Australia)                  Phone: +61 (0)419 792 394
Manager, Quark IT                      http://www.quarkit.com.au
         Quark AudioVisual             http://www.quarkav.net

http://www.threatcode.com/ <-- its now time to shame poor coders 
into writing code that is acceptable for use on today's networks

War doesn't determine who is right.  War determines who is left.

This document and any attachments are for the intended recipient 
  only.  It may contain confidential, privileged or copyright 
     material which must not be disclosed or distributed.

                    Quark Group Pty. Ltd.
      T/A Quark Automation, Quark AudioVisual, Quark IT 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com 
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]
> On Behalf Of Matt Florell
> Sent: Thursday, 6 April 2006 01:45
> 
> The load on the system will crash your server with that many instances
> of real-time sphinx running. Take a look at 'top' while you run it
on
> tow channels at once an see what the load is.
> 
> MATT---
> 
> 
> On 4/5/06, Matt <mhoppes@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4/5/06, Matt Florell <astmattf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > In my experience capacity is a huge problem. You can't 
> > > have sphinx running on 48 channels at once. It is 
> > > limited to only a few instances at a time. Although I 
> > > only did trials with sphinx2.
> > >
> > > What version are you using? and what dictionary?
> >
> > Sphinx2 - A customized dictionary.  What would happen if 
> > you tried to run it on 48 channels at once?  Is it a 
> > server issue?