search for: avt

...1 #define CONFIG_TI_C6X 1 Are there any better or further possibilities to get a speed optimized code on the TI C6418? Code size is less relevant. Many thanks in advance! Best regards, Robert Robert Madinger [avt_logo_signatur] AVT Audio Video Technologies GmbH Nordostpark 91 | D-90411 Nuernberg T: +49 911 5271-0 | F: +49 911 5271-100 RMadinger at avt-nbg.de<mailto:%0bRMadinger at avt-nbg.de> | www.avt-nbg.de<http://www.avt-nbg.de/> Managing Director: Wilfried Hecht Registered Office: Nuernbe...

...annot find it after enabling the TI_C6X_ASM config option. Maybe it was only part of an early version of the Opus sources? I looked for the file in versions V1.1, V1.1.1, V1.2alpha and V1.3 but did not found it. Do you have an idea, where I can get the file? Thank you and best regards, Robert AVT Audio Video Technologies GmbH Nordostpark 91 | D-90411 Nuernberg T: +49 911 5271-0 | F: +49 911 5271-100 RMadinger at avt-nbg.de | www.avt-nbg.de Managing Director:  Wilfried Hecht Registered Office:   Nuernberg, HRB 14317           AVT is now on Twitter - Follow @AVTGmbH -----Ursprüngliche Nac...

Hi Jean-Marc, Alfred and Greg, Are you receiving the mails from IETF about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex The mails are not coming from AVT mailing list, but I think we are all 3 part of a minimal list (draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex at tools.ietf.org) dedicated to latest discussion about the draft. I have answered some questions, but there are small changes and adaptation still required to the i...

...gt; Maybe it was only part of an early version of the Opus sources? > I looked for the file in versions V1.1, V1.1.1, V1.2alpha and V1.3 but did not found it. > > Do you have an idea, where I can get the file? > > Thank you and best regards, > Robert > > > > > AVT Audio Video Technologies GmbH > Nordostpark 91 | D-90411 Nuernberg > T: +49 911 5271-0 | F: +49 911 5271-100 > RMadinger at avt-nbg.de | www.avt-nbg.de > Managing Director:  Wilfried Hecht > Registered Office:   Nuernberg, HRB 14317 >           AVT is now on Twitter - Follow @AVTG...

All: The latest draft RTP Payload Format for Speex is available via the IETF. See below for details. Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:56:23 -0500 From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org To: IETF-Announce: ; Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. <p> Title : RTP Payload Format for the Speex Codec Author(s) : G. Herlein Filename : draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2004-3-9...

interesting for anyone testing out speex :) kfish. ----- Forwarded message from Alan Clark <alan.d.clark@telchemy.com> ----- From: Alan Clark <alan.d.clark@telchemy.com> To: avt@ietf.org Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:57:01 -0400 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Subject: [AVT] Open Speech Repository We've started to build a database of speech samples in multiple languages using (roughly) phonetically balanced source material. The site currentl...

...quot;license" chapter (chapter 9) and we need to remove it because ietf don't like it... Probably a little more... Aymeric > Jean-Marc > > Aymeric Moizard a ?crit : >> Hi Jean-Marc, Alfred and Greg, >> >> Are you receiving the mails from IETF about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex >> >> The mails are not coming from AVT mailing list, but I think we are >> all 3 part of a minimal list (draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex at tools.ietf.org) >> dedicated to latest discussion about the draft. >> >> I have answered some questions, but there are...

...incominglimit=2 mailbox=2001@default disallow=all allow=alaw allow=ulaw callgroup=2 pickupgroup=2 and in the SIPDefault.cnf for the phones I have: # Inband DTMF Settings (0-disable, 1-enable (default)) dtmf_inband: 1 # Out of band DTMF Settings (none-disable, avt-avt enable (default), avt_always - always avt ) dtmf_outofband: avt # DTMF dB Level Settings (1-6dB down, 2-3db down, 3-nominal (default), 4-3db up, 5-6dB up) dtmf_db_level: 3 DTMF works for voicemail and for remote services over both analogue Zap channels and digital (ISDN) channels....

...mat did not occur. Details below. Progress continues, though, towards getting the Speex payload format approved. Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:58:23 -0800 (PST) From: Stephen Casner <casner@acm.org> To: Greg Herlein <gherlein@herlein.com> Cc: avt@ietf.org Subject: Re: [AVT] Speex: Apologies for Missed Meeting Greg, > To those expecting my presentation yesterday on the Speex codec, > I apologize for not being there. I was caught out in the traffic > mess that occurred due to the anti-war protests - I could not get > to the mee...

...bled (default) # Telnet Level (enable or disable the ability to telnet into this phone telnet_level: "2" ; 0-Disabled (default), 1-Enabled, 2-Privileged # Inband DTMF Settings (0-disable, 1-enable (default)) dtmf_inband: "1" # Out of band DTMF Settings (none-disable, avt-avt enable (default), avt_always - always avt ) dtmf_outofband: "avt" # DTMF dB Level Settings (1-6dB down, 2-3db down, 3-nominal (default), 4-3db up, 5-6dB up) dtmf_db_level: "3" # SIP Timers timer_t1: "500" ; Default 500 msec timer_t2: "400...

FYI, -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Colin Perkins <csp at csperkins.org> Subject: Working group last call: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-05.txt Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:25:03 +0100 Size: 2054 Url: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20080331/289739db/attachment.eml

Hi, some good news from IETF :) /alfred -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: The IESG <iesg-secretary at ietf.org> Subject: [AVT] Protocol Action: 'RTP Payload Format for the Speex Codec' to Proposed Standard Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 06:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Size: 3867 Url: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20090518/373c4928/attachment.eml

...; > Are there any better or further possibilities to get a speed optimized > code on the TI C6418? > > Code size is less relevant. > >   > > Many thanks in advance! > > Best regards, > > Robert > >   > >   > > Robert Madinger > > avt_logo_signatur > AVT Audio Video Technologies GmbH > Nordostpark 91 | D-90411 Nuernberg > T:+49 911 5271-0 | F: +49 911 5271-100_ > RMadinger at avt-nbg.de <mailto:%0bRMadinger at avt-nbg.de>_| www.avt-nbg.de > <http://www.avt-nbg.de/> > Managing Director:  Wilfried Hec...

Hi all, Below is the Vorbis RTP Internet Draft as sent to the AVT working group of the IETF. Comments and feedback is still welcomed from the Vorbis community. Cheers Phil ---------------------------8<-----------------8<------------------------ Network Working Group Phil Kerr Internet-Draft The Ogg Vorbis January 07, 2003...

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:20:05PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >>Hi Luca, > >> > >>Thank you for working on the Theora and Vorbis drafts in the IETF's AVT > >>WG. Do you also plan to work on the Speex draft? > > > >other people are working on the speex I-D, Ralph should be able to tell > >you which to contact ^^; > > Hi Ralph, let me know how I can help on the Speex I-D -- we'd like to > make sure that our us...

Hi all, Apologies in advance, this email is quite long. I've prepared an updated Vorbis RTP Internet Draft, which is a continuation of draft-moffitt-vorbis-rtp-00.txt which can be found below. If this new draft gets the ok I'd like to submit this to the AVT WG later this week. There are a number of changes over the original I-D, notably the changing of the M bit function in the RTP header to match current AVT practice, together with an initial suggestion for codebook delivery. Other changes are the expansion of previous sections and the explicit dec...

Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves wrote: > Do not forget to add the "Copying conditions" to the RFC. > > Check http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments > I would be happy to add this statement. Could you let me know where to insert this statement in the xml document? I am using xml2rfc to generate the draft. Or alternatively point to other documents (.xml sources) that have the

On 6/1/07, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > No, keep as is. It is definitely not public domain, since it's > BSD-licensed and "patent-free" will open futile and unnecessary > discussions (on what it's supposed to mean) at the IETF. I was under the impression that Speex, like Vorbis and FLAC had its specification under the PD, and only the

> I was under the impression that Speex, like Vorbis and FLAC had its > specification under the PD, AFAIK, under US law, the only way for something to fall in the public domain is for either 1) the author to be an employee of the US government or 2) the author to be dead for more than X years (X being larger than the age of Mickey Mouse). To the best of my knowledge (did I miss

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> Also, we need to know why there is a "license" chapter (chapter 9) >> and we need to remove it because ietf don't like it... > > IIRC, the reason for the license is to make the document compatible with > the Debian licensing guidelines or something like that. > I would like to know if we should keep this additional license chapter