search for: atftpd

...y case e.g.: RIPLinuX [2]. A friend tested this image on his PXE boot server with success. I also checked the download with md5sum. In my case I can see the boot menu [3]. If I want to boot the Linux system e.g. kernel32 I get the massage: Invalid or corrupt kernel image. I tried the tftp-hpa and atftpd without success. In both cases the same behavior. Maybe syslog can help you to analyze the problem: 13:03:35 dnsmasq-dhcp[67]: DHCPDISCOVER(br0) xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx 13:03:35 dnsmasq-dhcp[67]: DHCPOFFER(br0) 192.168.1.67 xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx 13:03:37 dnsmasq-dhcp[67]: DHCPREQUEST(br0) 192.168.1.67 xx...

...x.cfg/01-00-18-71-7c-b1-02 _ ------------ The requestet file exists and is world readable. This is the part of the syslog (running atftd with verbose=7) ------------------------------------------- Nov 7 09:37:45 aslixp04 in.tftpd[18676]: connect from bw007565 (10.33.2.67) Nov 7 09:37:45 aslixp04 atftpd[18676]: Advanced Trivial FTP server started (0.7) Nov 7 09:37:45 aslixp04 atftpd[18676]: started by inetd Nov 7 09:37:45 aslixp04 atftpd[18676]: logging level: 7 Nov 7 09:37:45 aslixp04 atftpd[18676]: directory: /tftpboot/ Nov 7 09:37:45 aslixp04 atftpd[18676]: user: nobody.nogroup Nov...

I'm trying to network boot a thin client using pxelinux. I had this working about a year ago but have since reinstalled my OS (went from RH9 to FC2). I'm using atftpd. The thin client gets the dhcp address fine and requests pxelinux.0. Eventually, it just times out. Here's the relevant info from /var/log/messages: Oct 7 23:14:36 home atftpd[4717]: Advanced Trivial FTP server started (0.7) Oct 7 23:14:36 home atftpd[4717]: started by inetd Oct 7 23:14:3...

...uxdhcp dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 10.1.136.65 to 9c:b6:54:b6:7d:f0 via 10.7.64.77 Mar 5 12:57:20 tuxdhcp dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 10.1.136.65 (10.7.63.247) from 9c:b6:54:b6:7d:f0 via 10.7.64.77 Mar 5 12:57:20 tuxdhcp dhcpd: DHCPACK on 10.1.136.65 to 9c:b6:54:b6:7d:f0 via 10.7.64.77 Mar 5 12:57:20 tuxdhcp atftpd[29200]: Serving efipxe/bootx64.efi to 10.1.136.65:1436 Mar 5 12:57:20 tuxdhcp atftpd[29200]: Serving efipxe/bootx64.efi to 10.1.136.65:1437 Mar 5 12:57:20 tuxdhcp atftpd[29200]: Serving efipxe/ldlinux.e64 to 10.1.136.65:1438 Mar 5 12:57:21 tuxdhcp atftpd[29200]: Serving efipxe/ldlinux.e64 to 10....

On Mar 8, 2014 10:08 AM, "Gene Cumm" <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mar 8, 2014 9:27 AM, "Steven Shiau" <steven at nchc.org.tw> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 03/08/2014 10:06 PM, Gene Cumm wrote: > > >> Hi Gene, > > >> > Thanks. As you suggested, I did a test about 6.03-pre6, and I still got > >

...hardware ethernet 00:0C:29:38:6B:6E; > filename "e6/bootx64.efi"; > next-server 172.21.1.1; > # option vendor-encapsulated-options > d2:1B:68:74:74:70:3A:2F:2F:31:37:32:2E:32:31:2E:31:2E:31:2F:74:66:74:70:2F:65:36:2F:00:FF; > } > > Currently atftpd (better logging and not interested in 92+MiB files > via TFTP when I have HTTP). > > From /tftpboot, I have a directory e6/ containing all EFI64 files and > a bunch of symlinks within the directory and to the parent (where I > keep BIOS stuff, including some kernel/initrds that can d...

On 18.09.2015 16:35, Gene Cumm wrote: > 1) This is actually a critical cusp size. Watch what tftpd you use or > you'll never get it all. The tftpd needs to support rollover. > Consider HTTP as it should be more capable and much faster. The used TFTPD works fine with BIOS machines. I have two Initrd images. One is 64bit and almost 90MB and the 32bit is 85MB. I know that some tftpd

It seems that tftpd-hpa is more suitable at serving arbitrarily large files (greater than 65535 blocks long; with pxelinux.0 using a default block size of 1408 this is 92,273,280 bytes) as atftpd will complain in the log stating "Requested file to big, increase BLKSIZE". I saw that a while back HPA mentioned that atftpd was probably more scalable (number of clients) while tftpd-hpa is more portable. It looks like tftpd-hpa supports block number rollover while atftpd doesn't...

Hello, we have the following problem: - a new Dell Optiplex 740 boots pxelinux.0 - loads the kernel - start to load the miniroot.gz and crashs after loading about 1/5 of the miniroot The tftpd messages are: Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006 atftpd[26225]: Advanced Trivial FTP server started (0.7) Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006 atftpd[26225]: Serving /linux/pxelinux.0 to 10.10.100.113:2070 Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006 atftpd[26225]: Serving /linux/pxelinux.0 to 10.10.100.113:2071 Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006 atftpd[26225]: Serving /linux/pxelinux.cfg/01-00-1d-09...

...61:80:81:82:83:84:85:86:87 - PXEClient:Arch:00007:UNDI:003016 - no dhcp-client-id Mar 10 08:09:32 drbldbn dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.182) from 3c:97:0e:9b:75:46 via eth1 Mar 10 08:09:32 drbldbn dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.1.1 to 3c:97:0e:9b:75:46 via eth1 Mar 10 08:09:32 drbldbn atftpd[4821]: Serving bootx64.efi to 192.168.1.1:1549 Mar 10 08:09:32 drbldbn atftpd[4821]: Serving bootx64.efi to 192.168.1.1:1550 Mar 10 08:12:02 drbldbn dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.1.1 from 3c:97:0e:9b:75:46 via eth1 Mar 10 08:12:02 drbldbn dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.1.1 to 3c:97:0e:9b:75:46 via...

I'm interested to find out how many people are running tftp-hpa versus atftpd. I'm almost a bit surprised in how many people seem to be using tftp-hpa; for modern Unix systems (including Linux), I would in general assume atftpd to be a better choice. If you have tried both and specifically chosen (as opposed to "it was already installed", etc.) I'd b...

On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mar 8, 2014 10:08 AM, "Gene Cumm" <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> vNIC not VMNet. AMD PCNet32 vlance, Intel e1000, Intel e1000e, VMware >>> VMXNet3? Feel free to

.... It displayes the IP Address and then: Loading Kernel..... ok Loading initrd.bz2... This stalls for minutes and the client reboots afterwards. > Have you tried doing a packet capture to see how far this client progresses? > > What tftpd? Have you reviewed the logs for partial transfers? atftpd here's the syslog output. Sep 21 12:28:47 exp-srv-001 atftpd[5286]: Serving linux/syslinux64.efi to 192.168.10.174:1921 Sep 21 12:28:47 exp-srv-001 atftpd[5286]: Serving linux/ldlinux.e64 to 192.168.10.174:1922 Sep 21 12:28:47 exp-srv-001 atftpd[5286]: Serving linux/pxelinux.cfg/564dc8d7-26...

On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Steven Shiau <steven at nchc.org.tw> wrote: > Hi Gene, > Thanks. As you mentioned, atftpd has better logging, and my files are > smaller than 92 MB, so I switched to atftpd for testing. Now I could > find that somehow after bootx64.efi is downloaded by client, the next > ldlinux.e64 has never been fetched by client: > ==================== > Mar 8 14:47:49 atftpd[11886]:...

...to read from the jail/dev/log device. However, I can't seem to launch it from within the jail. It works fine when I try from the regular prompt, but when I try to launch from within the jail, I doesn't want to start: [root at apollo tftpd]# /usr/sbin/chroot /chroot/tftpd/ /usr/sbin/atftpd --daemon --no-fork in /var/log/messages: Jan 12 23:09:02 apollo atftpd[17479]: atftpd: udp/tftp, unknown service So it apparently is unable to read my /chroot/tftpd/etc/services file. If I set the port number manually: [root at apollo tftpd]# /usr/sbin/chroot /chroot/tftpd/ /usr/sbin/atftpd...

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >>>> > > 5) upload handles.txt somewhere > > It's waiting at http://okkie.nu/tmp/handles.txt > <<< > > > OK your HP has 4 NICs > > DevicePath(0x0,0x0)/MAC(ECB1D775E524,0x0) > DevicePath(0x0,0x1)/MAC(ECB1D775E525,0x0)) >

...nd I uncompressed the files in tftpboot directory. I don't get any luck here either. I look in the /var/log/messages and I observed that my phone request 4 different files that i don't have it in my tftp directory. Here's my tftp output session with my phone: Feb 13 11:19:36 linux-9pg5 atftpd[18825]: Serving OS79XX.TXT to 192.168.1.3:52178 Feb 13 11:19:36 linux-9pg5 atftpd[18825]: Serving SEP00141CAA4B4C.cnf.xml to 192.168.1.3:52179 Feb 13 11:19:36 linux-9pg5 atftpd[18825]: Serving XMLDefault.cnf.xml to 192.168.1.3:52180 Feb 13 11:19:36 linux-9pg5 atftpd[18825]: Serving SEP00141CAA4B4C....

On 2014?03?07? 23:05, Ady wrote: > I understand that these remarks might seem not the main issue, but I > tend to think that once you are successful while using only "default" > > values and in a minimalistic case, you could add complexity > (different paths, multiple firmwares, additional kernels, multiple > cfg files...). Ady, Thanks. I will follow your advice to

...s to be C0A80117 192.168.1.23 ip=192.168.1.23:0.0.0.0:192.168.1.1:255.255.255.0 TFTP prefix: Trying to load: pxelinux.cfg/01-00-40-63-ca-68-a5 192.168.1.23 is the preferred ip address for this machine. 192.168.1.93 is the dhcp/tftp server. 192.168.1.1 is the router/firewall. I tried tftpd-hpa and atftpd. I used atftpd some time ago (with the exact same pxelinux/debian-installer files), but now this fails. On my dhcp/tftp server i have gcc4. A current Debian unstable with 2.6 kernel. I have tried hard rebooting, disabling WOL and i have no ACPI. This is what the tftp daemon writes in my log tftp...

...1:82:83:84:85:86:87 - PXEClient:Arch:00007:UNDI:003000 - no dhcp-client-id Mar 8 21:25:08 drbldbn dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.120.1 (192.168.120.254) from 00:0c:29:6e:ac:93 via vmnet1 Mar 8 21:25:08 drbldbn dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.120.1 to 00:0c:29:6e:ac:93 via vmnet1 Mar 8 21:25:08 drbldbn atftpd[10339]: Serving bootx64.efi to 192.168.120.1:1538 Mar 8 21:25:08 drbldbn atftpd[10339]: Serving bootx64.efi to 192.168.120.1:1539 Mar 8 21:25:23 drbldbn atftpd[10339]: Serving ldlinux.e64 to 192.168.120.1:1540 Mar 8 21:25:28 drbldbn atftpd[10339]: timeout: retrying... Mar 8 21:25:33 drbldbn atf...