search for: arrogantly

although basically hopeful of the company''s ''rough cuts'' venture, i am insulted by the fact that o''reilly''s safari service offers important material to its regular subscribers only if they pay extra for it. o''reilly''s material on ajax is a good example: all of the introductory coverage is available only as pricey ''rough

Nov 19, 2003 To Everyone on this list... What's been suggested for a FAQ and other "much needed information" for such a _HIGHLY_ technical software product has been proven thousands of times in the past few months. Even an untrained monkey can see that, including many geeks. Those that are against it are the very _few_ arrogant self-centered egotistical few that think their middle

On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 15:17 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > The answer is clear to me: general security principles. By the time EL8 comes out, we?ll have had ~3 years of warnings under EL7 that weak passwords would not be tolerated, and they?re finally disallowing them. Good! > > (More like 6 years, actually, because EL6 gives a red warning bar for weak passwords.) > > Let?s flip

Thank you so much for your hard work! LLVM/Clang is in need of motivated Windows developers willing to put in the time to make the LLVM/Clang experience better on Windows :) Quick note on the reST: instead of using a construct like: **Notice:** If you only want to build 32-bit programs, you do **not** need to install MinGW64. Prefer to use the reStructuredText "admonitions" <

Yes, sorry, the LLVM CMake documentation :-) I don't think I am duplicating a large chunk; I am continuously trying to shave off extraneous and redundant stuff off my Windows-specific document. I just managed to shave off about six lines or so because I don't like the huge introduction and explanation of what MinGW is. Now that the document covers Ninja, there's even more reason for

Hi, The docs state that you can do a "make update" to update all top-level and embedded projects from Subversion. This does not appear to work with Ninja. Ninja just reports the following error: ninja: ERROR: unknown target 'update' FYI. Perhaps somebody is already looking into integrating Ninja better intp the build process. Or, perhaps I am just a too early adopter

On 3 February 2015 at 10:31, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > If testing then a one character password is very acceptable to me. Why > should some arrogant nutter impose an arduous ultra secure password when > a simple one character password will suffice ? Who knows the machine, > the deploying environment and the circumstances better ? The user or > some

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 11:31:35PM +0000, Always Learning wrote: > If testing then a one character password is very acceptable to me. Why > should some arrogant nutter impose an arduous ultra secure password when > a simple one character password will suffice ? Who knows the machine, > the deploying environment and the circumstances better ? The user or > some anonymous and

Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> writes: [snip] > Yes, I am quite familiar with the CMake documentation, but why are you > asking? That's not the cmake documentation, that's the LLVM cmake documentation: a short document that tries to explain everything you need to know about cmake to build LLVM. I had the impression that you were duplicating a large chunk of the info

On Monday 24 May 2010 14:32:19 Eli Friedman wrote: > Resending the email isn't really productive; for the given question, > the lack of a reply should answer your question. Was there something > else you wanted to ask? I find this message unhelpful at best, if not purely arrogant. You are making an open source compiler, I am making an open source processor: we are fighting for the

> > There is a big confusion here about Stir Shaken. It is NOT a provider > issue. Un fact, all providers are whasing their hands and modifying their > swihtches to pass-through the Signature. They cannot sign the call because > then the become the responsible party for the call before the FCC, and > liable for any illegal call. Every owner of a PBX that sends calls to the >

Hi Nikola, Thank you very much for your feedback! I am beginning to feel slightly dizzy from all the suggestions that go against each other :-) I'll fix the documentation so that it uses MinGW and MinGW-W64. I'll ignore that the 64-bit version targets both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows, so as to keep things simple. I'll use your link, thank you for that. It is intended to be a brief,

On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 20:04 +0100, Sven Kieske wrote to Valeri Galtsev .... > I can't take this serious as it seems you didn't research any of the > design goals of systemd and any of the shortcomings of old init systems. Design goals ? Compatibility with and/or minimum disruption to existing systems ? It was arrogant change with absolutely no regard for the existing Centos/RHEL

Hi all, Here's an updated version of my proposed "Building with MinGW on Windows" document. In summary, the document gives a step-by-step description of how to build LLVM + Clang on Windows WITHOUT having Microsoft Visual Studio installed. The high-level goal of the document is to make life pleasant for those wonderful Windows users who desire to try out LLVM and/or Clang. I

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Sébastien Bourdeauducq <sebastien.bourdeauducq at lekernel.net> wrote: > Just bringing that up as I did not get any reply so far. Resending the email isn't really productive; for the given question, the lack of a reply should answer your question. Was there something else you wanted to ask? -Eli > Thanks, > Sébastien > > > On Tuesday

Question for all: Right now i have a Table in a mySQL DB that has a row called Ingredients. When the data is entered into the DB its enter like so from a text area: 1 1/2 lbs. beef top sirloin, thinly sliced 1/3 cup white sugar 1/3 cup rice wine vinegar 2 tablespoons frozen OJ concentrate 1 teaspoon salt 1 tablespoon soy sauce 1 cup long grain rice 2 cups water 1/4 cup cornstarch 2 teaspoons

Now this is interesting: Revision: 158653 Author: mspencer Date: Monday, 18 June, 2012 09:00:48 Message: [MSExtensions] Add support for __forceinline. __forceinline is a combination of the inline keyword and __attribute__((always_inline))

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > It is a good question even though it is obvious :-)  No, for the last few > days, I have not been able to build Clang with make -j2 or -j4 - the build > always fails on a ranlib operation. > > Also, on Windows, GNU Make seems to be somewhat broken with respect to >

On 7/13/20 2:32 PM, Saint Michael wrote: > > There is a big confusion here about Stir Shaken. It is NOT a > provider issue. Un fact, all providers are whasing their hands and > modifying their swihtches to pass-through the Signature. They > cannot sign the call because then the become the responsible party > for the call before the FCC, and liable for any

...way I can update a RHEL box using other means rather than RHN? Excluding the manual FTP download and manual RPM installation; is there any other source and means I can use. Again, I hope I'm asking this question safely here. Since I asked already similar question to RH mailing lists; and they arrogantly pointed me here in CentOS - well thanks to them; I found a new home and a new distro. Regards, str