search for: arrogant

although basically hopeful of the company''s ''rough cuts'' venture, i am insulted by the fact that o''reilly''s safari service offers important material to its regular subscribers only if they pay extra for it. o''reilly''s material on ajax is a good example: all of the introductory coverage is available only as pricey ''rough

...... What's been suggested for a FAQ and other "much needed information" for such a _HIGHLY_ technical software product has been proven thousands of times in the past few months. Even an untrained monkey can see that, including many geeks. Those that are against it are the very _few_ arrogant self-centered egotistical few that think their middle initials are VoIP. It would be very easy to publish a list of such names on this list and only consume a half-inch of email space (even with Outlook Express in bold print, heaven forbid). And, their first names do not start with Mark either...

...users do not own their machines. M$ does. M$ determines what they can do and what data M$ secretly collects on them, stores on the machine and prevents the user viewing. Seems like another move towards emulating M$. If testing then a one character password is very acceptable to me. Why should some arrogant nutter impose an arduous ultra secure password when a simple one character password will suffice ? Who knows the machine, the deploying environment and the circumstances better ? The user or some anonymous and arrogant nutter perhaps many thousands of miles (or kilometers) away ? Remember machin...

...I simply don't understand your often repeated assumption that > "any user of LLVM knows this and that (and probably has a beard according > to many articles on how gurus look) and therefore we don't need to cater to > the less experienced". That attitude strikes ME as arrogant. Because it > makes life very complicated for those newbies that are just out to look and > learn. And there are many pitfalls on the Windows path because Clang++ > does not support the Microsoft C++ ABI and the MinGW64 C++ ABI: This was > nowhere documented before, now it is document...

...dows commands. I simply don't understand your often repeated assumption that "any user of LLVM knows this and that (and probably has a beard according to many articles on how gurus look) and therefore we don't need to cater to the less experienced". That attitude strikes ME as arrogant. Because it makes life very complicated for those newbies that are just out to look and learn. And there are many pitfalls on the Windows path because Clang++ does not support the Microsoft C++ ABI and the MinGW64 C++ ABI: This was nowhere documented before, now it is documented together with an...

...a just reports the following error: ninja: ERROR: unknown target 'update' FYI. Perhaps somebody is already looking into integrating Ninja better intp the build process. Or, perhaps I am just a too early adopter of Ninja because CMake + Ninja is still beta. -- Disclaimer: I am *not* arrogant in real life, so if you perceive me as being arrogant, you are to blame ;-) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120618/80a7050e/attachment.html>

On 3 February 2015 at 10:31, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > If testing then a one character password is very acceptable to me. Why > should some arrogant nutter impose an arduous ultra secure password when > a simple one character password will suffice ? Who knows the machine, > the deploying environment and the circumstances better ? The user or > some anonymous and arrogant nutter perhaps many thousands of miles (or > kilometers) awa...

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 11:31:35PM +0000, Always Learning wrote: > If testing then a one character password is very acceptable to me. Why > should some arrogant nutter impose an arduous ultra secure password when > a simple one character password will suffice ? Who knows the machine, > the deploying environment and the circumstances better ? The user or > some anonymous and arrogant nutter perhaps many thousands of miles (or > kilometers) awa...

Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> writes: [snip] > Yes, I am quite familiar with the CMake documentation, but why are you > asking? That's not the cmake documentation, that's the LLVM cmake documentation: a short document that tries to explain everything you need to know about cmake to build LLVM. I had the impression that you were duplicating a large chunk of the info

On Monday 24 May 2010 14:32:19 Eli Friedman wrote: > Resending the email isn't really productive; for the given question, > the lack of a reply should answer your question. Was there something > else you wanted to ask? I find this message unhelpful at best, if not purely arrogant. You are making an open source compiler, I am making an open source processor: we are fighting for the same cause, aren't we? I would have hoped for something else than such a troll-ish attitude. Sébastien

...nd charge you a fee, > something that some already a are doing when they detect robocallig. Don't even think about Transnexus, because they use 302 Redirect with a header, and no version of Asterisk supports it. I am the only game in the world for Stir-Shaken and Asterisk. I know it sounds arrogant but it is literally true. If you need to sign your calls to get through, with Asterisk, you need to connect to my service. I am an approved Service Provider from the FCC. If you keep thinking this is not happening, it is, and your business will disappear overnight. The issue is that Vicidial, for e...

...the readers of these lists, those issues got sorted. I hope I don't sound obtuse, hostile, or unfriendly. I think your points are generally very good and useful (and I will incorate most of them into the document), but I strongly disagree on the tutorial thingy :-) -- Disclaimer: I am *not* arrogant in real life, so if you perceive me as being arrogant, you are to blame ;-) 2012/6/18 Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > 3. The document now covers...

...0100, Sven Kieske wrote to Valeri Galtsev .... > I can't take this serious as it seems you didn't research any of the > design goals of systemd and any of the shortcomings of old init systems. Design goals ? Compatibility with and/or minimum disruption to existing systems ? It was arrogant change with absolutely no regard for the existing Centos/RHEL users. That *is* a strange "design goal" (or 'objective' in English). Some may consider that "goal" an inadvertent omission. Obviously designed by non-Centos/RHEL users for their personal amusement and pleas...

...seems that there is still some uncertainty as to whether this document is useful or not. Any and all comments are greatly appreciated. I do think, however, that it is time that we settle on this being an atomic document that cannot be split up further. Regards, Mikael -- Disclaimer: I am *not* arrogant in real life, so if you perceive me as being arrogant, you are to blame ;-) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120618/b074e48c/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-te...

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Sébastien Bourdeauducq <sebastien.bourdeauducq at lekernel.net> wrote: > Just bringing that up as I did not get any reply so far. Resending the email isn't really productive; for the given question, the lack of a reply should answer your question. Was there something else you wanted to ask? -Eli > Thanks, > Sébastien > > > On Tuesday

Question for all: Right now i have a Table in a mySQL DB that has a row called Ingredients. When the data is entered into the DB its enter like so from a text area: 1 1/2 lbs. beef top sirloin, thinly sliced 1/3 cup white sugar 1/3 cup rice wine vinegar 2 tablespoons frozen OJ concentrate 1 teaspoon salt 1 tablespoon soy sauce 1 cup long grain rice 2 cups water 1/4 cup cornstarch 2 teaspoons

Now this is interesting: Revision: 158653 Author: mspencer Date: Monday, 18 June, 2012 09:00:48 Message: [MSExtensions] Add support for __forceinline. __forceinline is a combination of the inline keyword and __attribute__((always_inline))

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > It is a good question even though it is obvious :-)  No, for the last few > days, I have not been able to build Clang with make -j2 or -j4 - the build > always fails on a ranlib operation. > > Also, on Windows, GNU Make seems to be somewhat broken with respect to >

...the next year I have no doubt if there are niches to be filled in providing CA or outright signing-as-a-service, businesses will be jumping out of the woodwork to provide it.  I'm not panicking yet. >   I am the only game in the world for Stir-Shaken and Asterisk. I know > it sounds arrogant but it is literally true. If you need to sign your > calls to get through, with Asterisk, you need to connect to my > service. I am an approved Service Provider from the FCC. If you keep > thinking this is not happening, it is, and your business will > disappear overnight. > Its...

...way I can update a RHEL box using other means rather than RHN? Excluding the manual FTP download and manual RPM installation; is there any other source and means I can use. Again, I hope I'm asking this question safely here. Since I asked already similar question to RH mailing lists; and they arrogantly pointed me here in CentOS - well thanks to them; I found a new home and a new distro. Regards, str