Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "ar5".
Did you mean:
a5
2003 Apr 30
2
Bug in arima?
I'm using the fixed argument in arima. Shouldn't ar4, ar5, and ar6
display as zero in the output?
Call:
arima(x = window(log(hhprice), start = c(1990, 1), end = c(2003, 3)),
order = c(7,
1, 0), xreg = window(ts.union(exa1 = lag(exa, -1), exa12 = lag(exa,
-12), exb1 = lag(exb, -1), exc1 = lag(exc, -1), exc12 = lag(exc,
-12)), start = c(1990,...
2009 Apr 09
1
arima on defined lags
Dear all,
The standard call to ARIMA in the base package such as
arima(y,c(5,0,0),include.mean=FALSE)
gives a full 5th order lag polynomial model with for example coeffs
Coefficients:
ar1 ar2 ar3 ar4 ar5
0.4715 0.067 -0.1772 0.0256 -0.2550
s.e. 0.1421 0.158 0.1569 0.1602 0.1469
Is it possible (I doubt it but am just checking) to define a more
parsimonous lag1 and lag 5 model with coeff ar1 and ar5?
Or do I need one of the other TS packages?
thanks
Gerard
*********...
2011 Sep 09
2
Different results with arima in R 2.12.2 and R 2.11.1
Hello , I have estimated the following model, a sarima:
p=9
d=1
q=2
P=0
D=1
Q=1
S=12
In R 2.12.2
Call:
arima(x = xdata, order = c(p, d, q), seasonal = list(order = c(P, D, Q),
period = S),
optim.control = list(reltol = tol))
Coefficients:
ar1 ar2 ar3 ar4 ar5 ar6 ar7 ar8
ar9
0.3152 0.8762 -0.4413 0.0152 0.1500 0.0001 -0.0413 -0.1811
0.0646
s.e. 0.0865 0.0885 0.1141 0.1181 0.1196 0.1220 0.1120 0.0908
0.0865
ma1 ma2 sma1
-0.0221 -0.9779 -0.7635
s.e. 0.0539 0.0534 0.0834
sigma^2 esti...
2006 Nov 22
2
problems with garchFit
...done something wrong? I am attaching the code, thank you.
Tian
#GARCH analysis of monthly return
rm(list=ls(all=TRUE))
sp500 <- read.csv('s&p_m90.csv', header=TRUE)
sp500 <- sp500[,2] #only adjusted close
n <- length(sp500)
logr <- log(sp500[1:n-1] / sp500[2:n])
acf(logr)
ar5 <- arima(logr, order = c(5, 0, 0), include.mean = T)
logr<- ar5$res
acf(logr)
#fit GARCH distribution
hist(logr, freq = F, ylim = c(0, 12), breaks = 'FD')
norm_fit <- normFit(logr)
curve(dnorm(x, norm_fit$est[1], norm_fit$est[2]), -.15, .15, add = TRUE,
col=2)
t_fit <- stdFit...
2003 Nov 24
0
link between arima and arma fit
...h an arima and the fit of
diff(x) with an arma (same coeff p & d) differ one from another
here are the output of R:
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> modelarma<-arma(diff(x),c(7,5))
> modelarma
Call:
arma(x = diff(x), order = c(7, 5))
Coefficient(s):
ar1 ar2 ar3 ar4 ar5 ar6 ar7 ma1 ma2
0.06078 -0.44774 0.41881 0.47624 0.01406 0.06565 -0.06167 -0.01294 0.31313
ma3 ma4 ma5 intercept
-0.49027 -0.55461 -0.11520 -0.10692
> modelarima<-arima(x,c(7,1,5))
> modelarima
Call:
arima(x = x, order = c(7, 1, 5))
Coefficients:
ar1 ar2 ar3 ar4 ar5 ar6 ar7 ma1 ma2 ma3...
2006 Nov 22
0
questions about garchFit
...a or something wrong? I am attaching the code,
thank you.
Muster
#GARCH analysis of monthly return
rm(list=ls(all=TRUE))
sp500 <- read.csv('s&p_m.csv', header=TRUE)
sp500 <- sp500[,2] #only adjusted close
n <- length(sp500)
logr <- log(sp500[1:n-1] / sp500[2:n])
acf(logr)
ar5 <- arima(logr, order = c(5, 0, 0), include.mean = T)
logr<- ar5$res #remove mean
acf(logr)
#fit GARCH distribution
hist(logr, freq = F, ylim = c(0, 12), breaks = 'FD')
norm_fit <- normFit(logr)
curve(dnorm(x, norm_fit$est[1], norm_fit$est[2]), -.15, .15, add = TRUE,
col=2)
t_fit...
2011 Sep 12
1
Difference in function arima estimation between 2.11.1 and R 2.12.2
Hello , I have estimated the following model, a sarima:
p=9
d=1
q=2
P=0
D=1
Q=1
S=12
In R 2.12.2
Call:
arima(x = xdata, order = c(p, d, q), seasonal = list(order = c(P, D, Q),
period = S),
optim.control = list(reltol = tol))
Coefficients:
ar1 ar2 ar3 ar4 ar5 ar6 ar7 ar8
ar9
0.3152 0.8762 -0.4413 0.0152 0.1500 0.0001 -0.0413 -0.1811
0.0646
s.e. 0.0865 0.0885 0.1141 0.1181 0.1196 0.1220 0.1120 0.0908
0.0865
ma1 ma2 sma1
-0.0221 -0.9779 -0.7635
s.e. 0.0539 0.0534 0.0834
sigma^2 esti...
2011 Feb 16
0
Arima contents
...rder = c(7, 0, 7), xreg = isr) :
possible convergence problem: optim gave code=1
In this case, when you print the results from the arima model, the error
message appears again:
> reg
Call:
arima(x = y, order = c(7, 0, 7), xreg = isr)
Coefficients:
ar1 ar2 ar3 ar4 ar5 ar6 ar7 ma1
ma2
-0.3356 0.0282 -0.0124 0.0604 0.1608 0.7949 0.2286 0.4461
0.0099
s.e. NaN 0.2140 0.1711 0.2545 0.1547 0.0725 NaN NaN
0.1842
ma3 ma4 ma5 ma6 ma7 intercept isr
0.0841 0.0773 -0.054 -0.7227 -0.1322...
2009 Feb 20
0
residuals from a fractional arima model and other questions
...Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
d 4.745e-01 0.000e+00 Inf <2e-16 ***
ar1 8.897e-01 0.000e+00 Inf <2e-16 ***
ar2 -3.386e-01 0.000e+00 -Inf <2e-16 ***
ar3 3.339e-01 2.044e-17 1.634e+16 <2e-16 ***
ar4 -4.406e-01 0.000e+00 -Inf <2e-16 ***
ar5 3.924e-02 6.349e-18 6.182e+15 <2e-16 ***
ar6 -5.184e-01 2.558e-17 -2.026e+16 <2e-16 ***
ar7 8.988e-01 0.000e+00 Inf <2e-16 ***
ar8 -7.568e-01 3.112e-16 -2.432e+15 <2e-16 ***
ar9 3.442e-01 2.175e-22 1.582e+21 <2e-16 ***
ma1 -1.190e-01 1.470e-18 -8.097e+16...
2008 Dec 12
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 2
This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just
enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86
paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge.
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops.
The binary patch optimization is important on native case because
the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect
2008 Dec 12
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 2
This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just
enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86
paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge.
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops.
The binary patch optimization is important on native case because
the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect
2008 Dec 22
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 3
This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just
enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86
paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge.
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which
depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen:
more paravirtualization.
The binary patch optimization is important on
2008 Dec 22
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 3
This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just
enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86
paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge.
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which
depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen:
more paravirtualization.
The binary patch optimization is important on
2009 Mar 04
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 4
This patch set is for the next merge window.
They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting
from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge.
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which
depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen:
more paravirtualization.
The binary patch optimization is important on native
2009 Mar 04
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 4
This patch set is for the next merge window.
They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting
from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge.
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which
depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen:
more paravirtualization.
The binary patch optimization is important on native
2008 Nov 25
6
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops.
The binary patch optimization is important on native case because
the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect
call into in-place execution or direct call.
The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting
things.
The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a
2008 Nov 25
6
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops.
The binary patch optimization is important on native case because
the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect
call into in-place execution or direct call.
The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting
things.
The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
...-Path: <sj.acevedo@gte.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from smtppop1pub.verizon.net (smtppop1pub.gte.net
[206.46.170.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2404F4846
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 10:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lsanca1-ar5-154-197.lsanca1.dsl.gtei.net
(lsanca1-ar5-154-197.lsanca1.dsl.gtei.net [4.35.154.197]) by
smtppop1pub.verizon.net with SMTP for <samba@lists.samba.org>; id
MAA133422394 Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:37:31 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by lsanca1-ar5-154-197.lsanca1.dsl.gtei.net with Microsoft
Mail id &...