search for: andrewjeski

Hi, I've a question about the syntax of the valid users option. Any help is greatly appreciated! Here is the Background: samba 3.0.4 Linux as Domain Member Active Directory, not in Native Mode Compiler opions: --with-winbind --with-pam --with-smbmount The goal is to authenticate via the Windows Domain and allow access via Windows groups. The syntax in my smb.conf looks like this:

...33:09, 1] libads/ldap.c:ads_default_ou_string(1085) Failed while searching for: <WKGUID=AA312825768811D1ADED00C04FD8D5CD,dc=AD,dc=CHECKPOINT,dc=COM> ads_join_realm: Operations error [2005/05/24 11:33:09, 2] utils/net.c:main(897) return code = -1 Any help greatly appreciated.. Mike Michael Andrewjeski Unix Administrator Zone Labs, A Check Point Company http://www.zonelabs.com Tel:? 415.633.4769 Fax:? 415.633.4501

OK, this one is really strange, and I'm not sure where to go with it. Here's the setup ... Main box is running Debian testing/sarge with samba 3.0.5. Earlier it was 3.0.4 and 3.0.2. Very generic installation for home, acting as a file server for several XP Pro boxes, and everything has been running swimmingly. Using USER security, with users logging in to the XP boxes with the same ID

...6) NT user token: (NULL) [2004/08/15 04:04:49, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_unix_user_token(505) UNIX token of user 0 Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups [2004/08/15 04:04:49, 5] smbd/uid.c:change_to_root_user(281) change_to_root_user: now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) Michael Andrewjeski Unix Administrator Zone Labs, A Check Point Company http://www.zonelabs.com Tel:? 415.633.4769 Fax:? 415.633.4501

I do if you're interested... -----Original Message----- From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:jerry@samba.org] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 11:45 AM To: mlueck@lueckdatasystems.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Update -> Someone with "Access Denied" from Windows plstry this test to compare notes with me -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael

Is there an improved BackupExec Unix agent available that works with Samba? If not, can someone tell me how to work around the lack of the archive bit that Linux has? In particular, RedHat Linux 7.2 is the system I'm looking for help on. I found the following hints in an older version of this newsletter, Samba Digest, Vol. 3, Issue 34, sent March 21, 2003, that had this in it: Yes, we have

Hello All, I'm having an odd problem with one user, he connects just fine to the Samba share but immediately get's an access denied message. The only thing out of the ordinary that I can see in the log file is the snippet below. The configuration is 3.0.4 on RedHat compiled with winbind and smbmount as a member server to a mixed mode Win2k domain. The output of smbd -b & smb.conf

I believe if your samba server is a member in one of the workgroups and there is a trust relationship between it and the other workgroup then you can configure samba to allow from the other workgroup in effect serving both workgroups. HTH Mike -----Original Message----- From: Mark Lidstone [mailto:mlidstone@bmtseatech.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 6:34 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org

Hi List, I'm wondering if someone can help me get past these errors Joining an ADS Domain, using samba 3.0.14a & kerberos 1.3.5. When I look at the debug output from the join attempt, it almost seems as though The join is looking for an cn or something from the AD that doesn't exist. I'm not an Windows person and the AD admins are not around to help peep this out. Can anyone

Hi List, I'm wondering if someone can help me get past these errors Joining an ADS Domain, using samba 3.0.14a & kerberos 1.3.5. When I look at the debug output from the join attempt, it almost seems as though The join is looking for an cn or something from the AD that doesn't exist. I'm not an Windows person and the AD admins are not around to help peep this out. Can anyone

Hi List, I'm getting an error join an ADS Domain, using samba 3.0.14a & kerberos 1.3.5. When I look at the debug output from the join attempt, it almost seems as though The join is looking for an OU or something from the AD that doesn't exist. I'm not an Windows person and the AD admins are not around to help peep this out. Can anyone take a look at the debug output below and