search for: ampst

On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:30 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > > wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> > wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have th...

...with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from > another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> Okay, thanks. Thre should be better warning/error reporting though. Aaron > > On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:02 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am getting this when running make-test :- > > > > $ /usr/src/llvm-test-2.5/configure > > checking for spec95 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/ > > vadve/shared/ben > > chmarks/spec95/benchspec >...

...you need to configure --with-externals=<path> > > > Okay, thanks. Thre should be better warning/error reporting though. > And Vikram Adve's home directory should not really be compiled into a release. Aaron > Aaron > > >> >> On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:02 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am getting this when running make-test :- >> > >> > $ /usr/src/llvm-test-2.5/configure >> > checking for spec95 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/ >> > vadve/shared/ben >>...

Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:30 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com<mailto:aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com>> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com<mailto:dalej at apple.com>> wrote: > T...

...le is not of required architecture Undefined symbols: "_main", referenced from: start in crt1.10.5.o ld: symbol(s) not found collect2: ld returned 1 exit status On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:16 AMPST, Brice Lin wrote: > >> Is it possible to add any flags to this command so that the resulting >> compile runs perfectly fine (-c builds, but does not work)? >> >> llvm-gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized >> -Wsign-compare -Wno-pointer-sign -W...

On Nov 16, 2009, at 10:49 AMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: > On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > >> >> On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: >> >>> In many places there is code that looks like: >>> >>> MBBI = next(MBBI); >>> >>>...

On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:16 AMPST, Brice Lin wrote: > Is it possible to add any flags to this command so that the resulting > compile runs perfectly fine (-c builds, but does not work)? > > llvm-gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized > -Wsign-compare -Wno-pointer-sign -Wformat-security -fno-bui...

Is it possible to add any flags to this command so that the resulting compile runs perfectly fine (-c builds, but does not work)? llvm-gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized -Wsign-compare -Wno-pointer-sign -Wformat-security -fno-builtin-memset -emit-llvm <filename.c> where <filename.c> contains #include <stdio.h> int main() { exit(0); } Thanks

On Feb 26, 2009, at 1:40 AMPST, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Feb 25, 2009, at 6:01 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > >> On Feb 25, 2009, at 4:59 PMPST, Bill Wendling wrote: >> >>> I'm running into a problem where I need to have the "gcc" that's >>> executed by "bugpoint" t...

On Dec 23, 2008, at 11:03 AMPST, Marc de Kruijf wrote: > > I'm writing a back-end for an architecture that supports multi-word > loads. As a concrete example, "ldqw r0, [addr]" would load a > quadword (4 words) into 4 registers starting with r0 (implicit > writes to r1, r2, and r3). ARM has t...

These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:02 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi, > > I am getting this when running make-test :- > > $ /usr/src/llvm-test-2.5/configure > checking for spec95 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/ > vadve/shared/ben > chmarks/spec95/benchspec > checking for spec2000 benchmark sources......

...ing: > > ld warning: in /var/tmp//cc7JazVe.o, file is not of required > architecture > Undefined symbols: > "_main", referenced from: > start in crt1.10.5.o > ld: symbol(s) not found > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >> On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:16 AMPST, Brice Lin wrote: >> >>> Is it possible to add any flags to this command so that the >>> resulting >>> compile runs perfectly fine (-c builds, but does not work)? You want to remove -emit-llvm from the command line. What is the motivation to add -emit-llvm on t...

On Dec 5, 2008, at 6:53 AMPST, Christian Sayer wrote: > Hello, > > I am working on the backend for an architecture which has a compare > instruction that affects only an internal condition code register > (basically a sub without destination register). You want to model the condition codes as a pseudo-regis...

On Jan 9, 2009, at 11:37 AMPST, Evan Cheng wrote: > This looks like a bar in ARMInstrInfo.td: > > BX_RET should be marked with Uses = [LR] since it uses LR. However, > this won't work if there is a call BL before the BX_RET. BL is marked > as if it implicitly define LR. So we'll end up with this (hello wo...

On Feb 25, 2009, at 6:01 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Feb 25, 2009, at 4:59 PMPST, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> I'm running into a problem where I need to have the "gcc" that's >> executed by "bugpoint" take certain arguments that aren't applicable >> to "llc". So, I came up with this patch, that adds a new flag >>

Hi, I am getting this when running make-test :- $ /usr/src/llvm-test-2.5/configure checking for spec95 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/ben chmarks/spec95/benchspec checking for spec2000 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/b enchmarks/speccpu2000/benchspec checking for spec2006 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/b

On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: > >> In many places there is code that looks like: >> >> MBBI = next(MBBI); >> >> In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when these >> calls are made. And due to ADL the above call becomes ambiguous: >>

I'm writing a back-end for an architecture that supports multi-word loads. As a concrete example, "ldqw r0, [addr]" would load a quadword (4 words) into 4 registers starting with r0 (implicit writes to r1, r2, and r3). First, is there any currently supported architecture that has anything like this? I suspect not. If not, I hope someone might help me figure out how to make this

Hello, I am working on the backend for an architecture which has a compare instruction that affects only an internal condition code register (basically a sub without destination register). I get the following assert in the scheduling phase: llvm::SDNode::getValueType(unsigned int) const: Assertion `ResNo < NumValues && "Illegal result number!"' failed. It turns out

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]