search for: ampdt

No, I don't. Cheers, Gary Dale Johannesen wrote: > This looks OK to check in, do you have write access? > > On Aug 21, 2008, at 6:38 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: > > >Dale Johannesen wrote: > >>On Aug 19, 2008, at 7:18 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: > >>>I'm trying to implement llvm.memory.barrier on PowerPC. I've > >>>modelled my patch (attached) on the implementation in X86, but > >&...

OK, I've checked it in for you, thanks. Please do contact Chris about write access. On Aug 22, 2008, at 12:38 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: > No, I don't. > > Cheers, > Gary > > Dale Johannesen wrote: >> This looks OK to check in, do you have write access? >> >> On Aug 21, 2008, at 6:38 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: >> >>> Dale Johannesen wrote: >>>> On...

This looks OK to check in, do you have write access? On Aug 21, 2008, at 6:38 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: > Dale Johannesen wrote: >> On Aug 19, 2008, at 7:18 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: >>> I'm trying to implement llvm.memory.barrier on PowerPC. I've >>> modelled my patch (attached) on the implementation in X86, but >>> when I try and com...

Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Aug 19, 2008, at 7:18 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: > > I'm trying to implement llvm.memory.barrier on PowerPC. I've > > modelled my patch (attached) on the implementation in X86, but > > when I try and compile my test file (also attached) with llc I > > get the error "Cannot yet select: 0x10...

Hi Dale, yes it's just stack alignment. Unfortunately your patch doesn't make any difference. Thanks for thinking about this, Duncan. On Friday 27 June 2008 19:51:00 Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:11 AMPDT, Duncan Sands wrote: > > FAIL: test/CodeGen/X86/vec_shuffle-10.ll > > Failed with exit(1) at line 3 > > while running: llvm-as < test/CodeGen/X86/vec_shuffle-10.ll | llc - > > march=x86 -mattr=+sse2 | not grep {sub.*esp} > > subl $16, %esp > >...

On Jun 30, 2008, at 9:25 AMPDT, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Dale, yes it's just stack alignment. Unfortunately > your patch doesn't make any difference. > > Thanks for thinking about this, > > Duncan. OK, the test is not quite right then. This doesn't happen on Darwin so I'm afraid you'll...

On Jul 1, 2008, at 10:11 AMPDT, Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi, > > Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >>> We were wondering if *all* of the dejagnu tests should pass (in the >>> sense that no result should be unexpected), because we have a few >>> failed >>> tests on our build. >> >> ma...

...amp; > FFI->getObjectIndexEnd()!=0) > ? yes, that works - thanks! Since I have no idea what this is doing, is it ok if I leave it to you to commit it? Thanks again, Duncan. > > On Friday 27 June 2008 19:51:00 Dale Johannesen wrote: > >> On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:11 AMPDT, Duncan Sands wrote: > >>> FAIL: test/CodeGen/X86/vec_shuffle-10.ll > >>> Failed with exit(1) at line 3 > >>> while running: llvm-as < test/CodeGen/X86/vec_shuffle-10.ll | llc - > >>> march=x86 -mattr=+sse2 | not grep {sub.*esp} > >>>...

...e is being addressed, and no PIC register was allocated. The allocation was supposed to happen in PPCDAGtoDAGISel::Select when the reference was processed, and a MovePCtoLR instruction inserted at that time. Somebody can probably figure it out by stepping through that. On Oct 27, 2010, at 10:16 AMPDT, D. Johnson wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+cl <at> mega-nerd.com> writes: > >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm compiling current SVN HEAD on Linux/x86. The tests are failing >> on PowerPC due to the following assertion failure : >> >>...

On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:28 AMPDT, Stéphane Letz wrote: > > Le 2 juin 2010 à 12:21, Eli Friedman a écrit : > >> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Stéphane Letz <letz at free.fr> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We need to generate "Floating point constants" in our code. In http://ll...

On Jul 15, 2009, at 11:52 AMPDT, Stuart Hastings wrote: > We've had a lot of churn in all the trunks (llvm, llvm-gcc, clang) > recently, and the testing buildbots have been failing repeatedly. > > I spoke with Chris this AM, and he suggested we have a "stabilization > day." Please avoid large, desta...

2009/3/18 Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> > On Mar 18, 2009, at 11:30 AMPDT, Misha Brukman wrote: > > Can someone with llvm-gcc/ARM expertise (Dale?) please review Sandeep's > patch? The patch works for me in building an LLVM-based cross-compiler from > x86_64/Linux to ARM/Linux. > I have been able to build without the patch to the asm file, but several...

We've had a lot of churn in all the trunks (llvm, llvm-gcc, clang) recently, and the testing buildbots have been failing repeatedly. I spoke with Chris this AM, and he suggested we have a "stabilization day." Please avoid large, destabilizing changes for about twenty-four hours. We would like for the testing bots to begin working again. Thanks, stuart

Le 2 juin 2010 à 12:21, Eli Friedman a écrit : > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Stéphane Letz <letz at free.fr> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We need to generate "Floating point constants" in our code. In http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html it is explained that FP has to follow special encoding rules to be handled by LLVM later one (hexadecimal coding...) >>

...ill there. I tried to take a look at .s file in /tmp directory, but it's already cleaned up. Is it because I enabled the optimization option when I compiled llvm? Regards, Won On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:04 AMPDT, Won J Jeon wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I built a llvm toolchain for ARM and I'm trying to build a simple > > application on ARM using LLVM. When I compiled the code, it has the > > following message and the binary code has a segmentation fault when > > it...

On Mar 18, 2009, at 11:30 AMPDT, Misha Brukman wrote: > Can someone with llvm-gcc/ARM expertise (Dale?) please review > Sandeep's patch? The patch works for me in building an LLVM-based > cross-compiler from x86_64/Linux to ARM/Linux. > I have been able to build without the patch to the asm file, but >...

Thanks. One thing though, who's Chris? Cheers, Gary Dale Johannesen wrote: > OK, I've checked it in for you, thanks. Please do contact Chris > about write access. > > On Aug 22, 2008, at 12:38 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: > > No, I don't. > > > > Cheers, > > Gary > > > > Dale Johannesen wrote: > > > This looks OK to check in, do you have write access? -- http://gbenson.net/

On Mar 17, 2009, at 11:37 AMPDT, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > I have, in an LLVM bitcode program, the following phi node: > > %iftmp.225.0 = phi i8* [ getelementptr ([10 x i8]* @.str12597431, > i32 0, > i32 0), %bb114 ], [ getelementptr ([10 x i8]* @.str1258, i32 0, i32 > 0), > %bb111 ], [...

On Apr 23, 2009, at 10:14 AMPDT, Devang Patel wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: >> >> The first client for metadata I have in mind for metadata is TBAA. > > Why do you think that TBAA will beat Debug Info on this front ;) > > Back to original topic...

On Oct 27, 2009, at 11:23 AMPDT, Stuart Hastings wrote: > The first buildbot failure I can readily find was Monday, 26oct2009 > around 7PM PDT. The assertion is > > Assertion failed: ((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) > == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function w...